Neonatal Bacterial Colonization Study

March 28, 2019 updated by: Angela Dramowski, University of Stellenbosch

Impact of 1% Chlorhexidine Gluconate and/or Emollient on Neonatal Bacterial Colonization Dynamics

This study will evaluate the effect of skin antisepsis and/or emollient therapy on bacterial colonization dynamics in very low birth weight, hospitalized infants. Bacterial swabs from 5 body sites will be collected at baseline, day 3, day 8 and day 13 following study arm assignment. Study outcomes include changes in bacterial colony counts, burden of gram-negative and gram-positive pathogens and overall skin score.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Despite substantial global decline in childhood mortality rates, equivalent progress in neonatal mortality reduction has not been achieved. Severe bacterial infection affects approximately 6.9 million neonates and causes an estimated 750 000 deaths in low-middle income countries (LMIC) annually. The neonatal period extends from birth to 28 days of life, although neonatal hospitalization episodes (and therefore infection risk) are often substantially prolonged in preterm infants. In South Africa, infections account for 13.8% of neonatal mortality (following prematurity and intrapartum hypoxia). The South African Perinatal Problem Identification Programme (PPIP) cites nosocomial infection as the second most prevalent avoidable factor in neonatal deaths. Developing new approaches to prevent infection in hospitalized and preterm newborns in LMIC is key to achieving the Sustainable Development targets for under-five child survival.

The risk for hospital-onset sepsis in African neonates is disproportionately high and influenced by many factors including: high rates of prematurity and low birth weight; increasing in-hospital births, understaffing of maternity and neonatal services and limited implementation of infection prevention practices. Of infections among hospitalized neonates in high-income settings, hospital-acquired bloodstream infections (HA-BSI) predominate, accounting for 57% of infections. Research addressing the problem of hospital-onset neonatal infection should therefore focus on BSI prevention. A key target for sepsis reduction is prevention of intrapartum and post-delivery acquisition of bacterial colonization. Although the pathogenesis of bacterial colonization preceding invasive infection is well-accepted, there is limited data describing neonatal bacterial colonization dynamics in low-resource settings. Full characterization of timing, source and route of bacterial acquisition, flora/pathogen distribution, balance and changes over time is needed to identify all potential targets for neonatal BSI prevention.

Emollient therapy and reduction of pathogen colonization through skin antisepsis, are potentially useful targets for reducing risk of hospital-acquired BSI in neonates. Emollients (oils, creams and ointments) have been applied daily or bi-daily in neonatal research and routine practice settings, to promote skin integrity in preterm infants <37 weeks' gestation. The postulated mechanism of effect is improved skin barrier function and promotion of normal flora colonization, which may prevent pathogen ingress and subsequent invasive infection. A 2016 Cochrane review of emollient therapy for sepsis prevention in preterm infants found no evidence of reduced mortality or bloodstream infection rates, but the authors concluded that further studies in low-resource settings were warranted.

Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) is a bisbiguanide molecule with broad-spectrum antiseptic activity producing membrane disruption through increased cell permeability and bacterial lysis. Efficacy and safety of daily CHG bathing to prevent pediatric bacteremia was established in a multicenter, cluster-randomized trial for infants >2 months in intensive care (ICU) using 2% CHG-impregnated cloths. Three high-quality studies of newborn CHG skin or cord cleansing showed reduced neonatal mortality and omphalitis in community-based neonates. Safety of topical CHG application for neonates has been established at concentrations ≤1%, although there is little data available on its use in premature, hospitalized neonates.

CHG skin cleansing and emollient therapy are potentially useful interventions for prevention of hospital-acquired BSI in neonates from low-resource settings. In addition, these interventions are suitable for inclusion in a neonatal sepsis prevention care bundle, should they be found to be effective, safe and feasible. In addition these interventions would be low-cost, easily scalable and potentially, a maternally-administered intervention. This study will evaluate the effect of skin antisepsis and/or emollient therapy on bacterial colonization dynamics in very low birth weight, hospitalized infants. Bacterial swabs from 5 body sites will be collected at baseline, day 3, day 8 and day 13 following study arm assignment. Study outcomes include changes in bacterial colony counts, burden of gram-negative and gram-positive pathogens and overall skin score.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Western Cape
      • Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa, 7503
        • Recruiting
        • Tygerberg Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Angela Dramowski, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Susan Coffin, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Mark Cotton, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Andrew Whitelaw, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Adrie Bekker, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Sheylyn Pillay, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Candice Macdonald, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 3 days (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Birth weight ≥1000g and ≤ 1500g (equivalent to gestational age 28 - 32 weeks)
  • Day 1 or 2 or 3 of life
  • Anticipated length of hospital stay > 7 days.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Birth weight <1000g or >1500g
  • Mother not present, unable or unwilling to provide consent for enrolment
  • Any skin condition or congenital defect that could potentially result in enhanced CHG absorption (skin blistering/bullae, congenital anomalies e.g. gastroschisis, spina bifida)
  • Anticipated length of hospital stay < 7 days.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Standard of Care
Routine bathing and skin care as per hospital practice
Experimental: 1% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG)
1% aqueous CHG applied from the neck down with cotton swabs daily on weekdays (total of 8 days CHG application)
1% aqueous chlorhexidine gluconate
Experimental: Emollient therapy
Aquaphor skin cream applied from the neck down daily on weekdays (total of 8 days emollient application)
Aquaphor skin cream
Experimental: 1% CHG plus emollient therapy
1% aqueous CHG applied from the neck down with cotton swabs daily on weekdays followed immediately by Aquaphor skin cream (total of 8 days CHG application plus emollient application)
1% aqueous chlorhexidine gluconate
Aquaphor skin cream

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in median bacterial colony counts by body site over time
Time Frame: baseline, day 3, day 8 and day 13 post enrolment
baseline, day 3, day 8 and day 13 post enrolment
Change in Gram negative pathogen burden by body site over time
Time Frame: baseline, day 3, day 8 and day 13 post enrolment
baseline, day 3, day 8 and day 13 post enrolment
Change in Gram positive pathogen burden by body site over time
Time Frame: baseline, day 3, day 8 and day 13 post enrolment
baseline, day 3, day 8 and day 13 post enrolment
Change in median skin condition score over time (Grading scale adapted by Darmstadt from Lane at al)
Time Frame: Daily from enrolment to day 13 post enrolment
Darmstadt skin score uses a 9-point scale (calculated as the sum of points for each of 3 items: skin eythema, dryness and breakdown, with a minimum score of 1 and maximum score of 3, representing worst possible skin condition for each sub-scale, total sum of points is a minimum score of 3 and maximum score of 9 for worst possible skin condition)
Daily from enrolment to day 13 post enrolment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of laboratory-confirmed sepsis
Time Frame: up until day 28 of life
pathogen identified on sterile site specimen (blood, urine, cerebrospinal fluid)
up until day 28 of life
Incidence of clinically-suspected sepsis
Time Frame: up until day 28 of life
culture-negative episode of infection with at least 5 days broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy
up until day 28 of life

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 4, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 30, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 25, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2019

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Anticipated availability from first quarter 2020

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prematurity

Clinical Trials on Skin antisepsis

3
Subscribe