Pain Control of Needle-free Versus Needle Injected Local Anesthesia for Pulpotomy of Upper Primary Molars in Children

Pain Control of Needle-less Jet Anesthesia Versus Conventional Infiltration Anesthesia for Pulpotomy of Maxillary Primary Molars in Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This is a study that will be conducted on 6 to 8 years old children to compare the needle-less jet injector with the conventional needle attached syringe in terms of efficiency in controlling pain of local anesthetic infiltration and post-anesthetic pulpotomy of upper first primary molars. The study tests a null hypothesis that states that there is no difference in pain control efficiency of the compared anesthetic techniques when used for the selected treatment procedure in the specified population.

Study Overview

• Status: Unknown
• Conditions: Anesthesia, Local
• Intervention / Treatment: Device: Jet injector; Device: Needle attached dental syringe

Detailed Description

• The conduct of this study is driven by the substantial advantages that are documented to be offered by jet anesthesia over needle injected anesthesia combined with the scarcity, heterogeneity, limitations and contradicting inconclusive results of previously conducted studies assessing the acceptance and anesthetic efficiency of jet injectors against conventional needle attached dental syringes in pediatric patients, particularly for pulpotomy of primary molars. Jet injection offers the opportunity to deliver local anesthesia without using a needle and hence helps to avoid all drawbacks associated with needle injection such as psychological distress; pain; inability to cope with dental treatment; prolonged chair-side time; avoidance of dental care; high clinician skills required for child management and needle-stick injuries. It also allows precise controlled dosing; fast delivery and onset of local anesthesia; absence of post-operative numbness and thus self-inflicted traumatic injuries; reduction of medical waste and cutting down of long-term costs on the clinician. However, the true adequacy of jet anesthesia necessary to complete dental treatment successfully and the acceptance of jet injection in a child patient is yet to be revealed through further research.
• This randomized controlled trial is to be performed on children attending the Diagnosis outpatient clinic in Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Egypt. Children will be screened via personal, medical and dental history taking from them and their parents/caregivers; clinical examination and radiographic examination to identify appropriateness for recruitment in the trial based on the pre-specified eligibility criteria. Legal guardians of eligible children will be informed of the trial aims, conditions and procedures in details and a written informed consent will be obtained from them upon agreement for their children to participate in the trial. A verbal assent will be also obtained from each potential participant following a simple explanation of the trial procedure.
• Based on the sample size to be calculated, a random allocation sequence will be computer generated and will be used to assign participants to the experimental group receiving jet anesthesia (group A) and the control group receiving conventional infiltration anesthesia (group B). The allocation sequence will be enclosed in sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes and disclosure of the randomization code to the principle investigator will be performed only upon allocation of each corresponding subject throughout the course of the trial.
• For each study group, participants will be introduced to the dental setting and dental instruments to be used and have the anesthetization and dental procedure simply explained while avoiding any anxiety-provoking words. Psychological behavior management techniques such as Tell-Show-Do, voice control, distraction and positive reinforcement will be used similarly for both study groups. Following delivery of anesthesia, pulpotomy of maxillary first primary molars will be performed.
• Throughout the treatment procedure, if rescue anesthesia was needed, it will be delivered by needle infiltration in both study groups and recorded.
• Primary and secondary outcome variables will be measured and recorded via selected tools at pre-specified time points.
• Definitive examination and diagnosis for determination of eligibility, anesthetization, treatment, outcome measurement and data collection procedures will be all performed by the principal investigator.
• The principal investigator will be responsible for managing any intervention-related harms encountered by participants, both medically and financially, following-up the participant whenever necessary and providing post-operative prevention and oral hygiene instructions.
• All examination charts and outcome sheets will be labelled each with a specific code unique to every individual participant. Participant personal information will be kept confidential in a secured limited access area. All data will be electronically backed-up and securely stored by the principal investigator. Statistical analysis and interpretation of the collected results will be performed.
• All study results are planned to be disclosed and communicated to the public via a written thesis that will be orally presented and discussed in a defense that is to be held in Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, in the presence of a selected jury. A manuscript of the trial work is planned to be prepared and submitted for publication.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Anticipated): 46
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 6 years to 8 years (Child)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Apparently healthy (Classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists/ ASA I)
• Vital deeply carious maxillary first primary molars indicated for pulpotomy
• No previous dental experience
• Cooperative behavior (rating 3 or 4 on Frankl Category Rating Scale

Exclusion Criteria:

• Refuse to give assent to participate or have parents/caregivers refusing to sign the informed consent form

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Single

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Jet anesthesia; Local infiltration anesthesia delivered using Madajet XL® (MADA Medical Products, Inc., Carlstadt, NJ, USA) needle-free jet injector	Device: Jet injector; The injection site will be dried with a sterile cotton swab and benzocaine 20% topical anesthetic gel/ Opahl® (Dharma Research, Inc., Miami, FL, USA) will be applied to the site using a cotton applicator for 2 mins prior to injection.; Articaine hydrochloride 4% with epinephrine 1:100,000 anesthetic solution/ ARTINIBSA 4%® (Inibsa Dental S.L.U., Lliçà de Vall, Barcelona, Spain) will then be delivered using Madajet XL injector as per the manufacturer's instructions.; A classical formocresol pulpotomy treatment procedure will be performed using formocresol/ Pyrocresol® (Pyrax Polymars, Roorkee, Uttarakhand, India) for fixation and polymer reinforced zinc oxide-eugenol/ Zinconol® (PREVEST DentPro, Digiana, Jammu, India) for restoration.; Primary and secondary outcome variables will be measured and recorded via selected tools at pre-specified time points.; All treated molars will be finally restored with stainless steel crowns or definitive restorations as indicated.; Other Names: Madajet XL needle-free injector; Needle-less syringe; Needle-less injector
Active Comparator: Conventional infiltration anesthesia; Local infiltration anesthesia delivered using 25 gauged short needle attached, 1.8 ml carpule loaded standard metal dental syringe	Device: Needle attached dental syringe; The injection site will be dried with a sterile cotton swab and benzocaine 20% topical anesthetic gel/ Opahl® (Dharma Research, Inc., Miami, FL, USA) will be applied to the site using a cotton applicator for 2 mins prior to injection.; Articaine hydrochloride 4% with epinephrine 1:100,000 anesthetic solution/ ARTINIBSA 4%® (Inibsa Dental S.L.U., Lliçà de Vall, Barcelona, Spain) will then be delivered using standard needle-attached syringe in a classical local infiltration.; A classical formocresol pulpotomy treatment procedure will be performed using formocresol/ Pyrocresol® (Pyrax Polymars, Roorkee, Uttarakhand, India) for fixation and polymer reinforced zinc oxide-eugenol/ Zinconol® (PREVEST DentPro, Digiana, Jammu, India) for restoration.; Primary and secondary outcome variables will be measured and recorded via selected tools at pre-specified time points.; All treated molars will be finally restored with stainless steel crowns or definitive restorations as indicated.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Pain during pulpotomy score on Faces Pain Scale-Revised, aggregated by mean	Faces Pain Scale- Revised is a participant self-reported pain rating scale that consists of six line drawings of faces in different degrees of distress, scored along a 0-10 metric, measuring pain. The scale starts by a neutral face scored '0' representing no pain and ends with a frowning face scored '10' representing maximum pain. Scores increase in increments of 2.; The scale will be explained to the participant who will then be asked to choose the face that represents how much pain he/she feels. The pain score corresponding to the chosen face will be recorded.	Immediately following completion of pulpotomy procedure
Pain during pulpotomy score on Sound Eye Motor scale, aggregated by mean	Sound Eye Motor scale is a clinician-reported pain rating scale that considers three types of physical observations- sound, ocular and motor- and scores each along a 1-4 subscale, measuring pain.'1' is designated as comfort (represents no pain) and '4' is designated as painful (represents maximum pain). Scores increase in increments of 1.; The participant will be observed and a score will be given by the assessor on each of the three subscales. The three scores given will be summed to obtain the total pain score at a specific time point of interest.; Primary pain assessment on Sound Eye Motor scale will be performed by principal investigator and independent duplicate pain assessment on the same scale will be performed by study director.	Immediately following removal of dentin caries and initial access to pulp
Pain during pulpotomy score on Sound Eye Motor scale, aggregated by mean	Sound Eye Motor scale is a clinician-reported pain rating scale that considers three types of physical observations- sound, ocular and motor- and scores each along a 1-4 subscale, measuring pain.'1' is designated as comfort (represents no pain) and '4' is designated as painful (represents maximum pain). Scores increase in increments of 1.; The participant will be observed and a score will be given by the assessor on each of the three subscales. The three scores given will be summed to obtain the total pain score at a specific time point of interest.; Primary pain assessment on Sound Eye Motor scale will be performed by principal investigator and independent duplicate pain assessment on the same scale will be performed by study director.	Immediately following pulp extirpation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Pain during injection score on Faces Pain Scale-Revised, aggregated by mean	Faces Pain Scale- Revised is a participant self-reported pain rating scale that consists of six line drawings of faces in different degrees of distress, scored along a 0-10 metric, measuring pain. The scale starts by a neutral face scored '0' representing no pain and ends with a frowning face scored '10' representing maximum pain. Scores increase in increments of 2.; The scale will be explained to the participant who will then be asked to choose the face that represents how much pain he/she feels. The pain score corresponding to the chosen face will be recorded.	Immediately following injection of local anesthesia
Pain during injection score on Sound Eye Motor scale, aggregated by mean	Sound Eye Motor scale is a clinician-reported pain rating scale that considers three types of physical observations- sound, ocular and motor- and scores each along a 1-4 subscale, measuring pain.'1' is designated as comfort (represents no pain) and '4' is designated as painful (represents maximum pain). Scores increase in increments of 1.; The participant will be observed and a score will be given by the assessor on each of the three subscales. The three scores given will be summed to obtain the total pain score at a specific time point of interest.; Primary pain assessment on Sound Eye Motor scale will be performed by principal investigator and independent duplicate pain assessment on the same scale will be performed by study director.	Immediately following injection of local anesthesia
Need for additional anesthesia, recorded as a binary (yes/no) outcome	Rescue anesthesia recorded by principal investigator	Immediately following completion of treatment for participant

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Cairo University
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Lobna S. Mohamed, B.D.S., Cairo University; Study Chair: Randa Y. Abd Al Gawad, Ph.D., Cairo University; Study Director: Mariam M. Aly, Ph.D., Cairo University

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Anticipated): August 1, 2019
• Primary Completion (Anticipated): May 1, 2020
• Study Completion (Anticipated): May 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: April 12, 2019
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: April 12, 2019
• First Posted (Actual): April 16, 2019

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): July 24, 2019
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: July 23, 2019
• Last Verified: July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Children; Local anesthesia; Primary molars; Pediatric patients; Pulpotomy; Vital pulp therapy; Jet injection; Jet anesthesia; Pressure anesthesia; Needle-free anesthesia; Needle-less anesthesia; Needle-free injection; Needle-less local anesthesia; Needle-less syringe; Needle infiltration anesthesia; Needle injection; Local infiltration anesthesia; Child patients
• Other Study ID Numbers: CEBD-CU-2019-04-05

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: Yes
• product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.: Yes