- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03923348
Pelvic Floor Muscle Training With Leva System for Urge Incontinence
June 30, 2020 updated by: Anne Stachowicz, The Christ Hospital
Pelvic Floor Muscle Training With the Leva® System for Treatment of Urge Predominant Urinary Incontinence: A Pilot Study
This is a pilot non-comparative study to assess the effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training guided by the leva® system for improving change in subject-reported incontinence-related quality of life and urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) episode frequency based on voiding diaries in women at 8 weeks.
Study Overview
Status
Terminated
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Our study aims to investigate a new alternative to formal pelvic floor physical therapy that may provide subjects with a more accessible, private method of undergoing pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) with real-time biofeedback on performance.
The leva® Pelvic Digital Health System by Renovia Inc is a novel tool for subjects with urinary incontinence to train and strengthen pelvic floor muscles via directional mechano-transductive feedback on performance in the privacy of their own homes.
We hypothesize that women using the leva® System will experience significant improvements in subjective urge-related incontinence symptoms.
In addition, changes in incontinence-related quality of life and UUI episode frequency will be determined.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
5
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Ohio
-
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45219
- The Christ Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 85 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18-85 years old
- Urinary incontinence for ≥ 3 months
- Reporting at least "moderate bother" on Item 2 on the UDI-6, "Do you experience urine leakage in related to the feeling of urgency" (on new patient paperwork)
- If mixed urinary incontinence, Medical Epidemiologic Social Aspect of Aging Urinary Incontinence Questionnaire (MESA) score indicating urge-predominant MUI (Urge subscale % > Stress subscale %)
- Presence of ≥ 1 UUI episode on 3-d bladder diary (see Appendix 2)
- Is the baseline bladder diary consistent with the patient's typical habits?
- Not currently taking anti-muscarinic or beta3 agonist therapy (after at least 2 week wash-out period)
- Brink Score > 3 (see below)
- Access to smartphone technology, including iOS or Android™
Exclusion Criteria:
- Non-English speakers
- Severely impaired mobility or cognition
- Spinal cord injury or advanced/severe neurologic condition including Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson's Disease
- Concomitant prolapse beyond the hymen or repair of prolapse in the previous 6 months
- Received intravesical botulinum injection within the previous 12 months
- History of implanted nerve stimulator for incontinence
- History of prior sling or vaginal mesh placement
- Previous diagnosis of Interstitial cystitis
- Active pelvic organ malignancy
- History of pelvic radiation
- Urethral obstruction
- Urinary retention or prolonged catheter use
- Less than 12 months post-partum are currently pregnant, or plan to become pregnant in the following 12 months
- Untreated symptomatic urinary tract infection
- Unevaluated hematuria
- Medical instability
- Not available for follow-up in 6 months
- Participation in other research trials that could influence results of this study
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: NA
- Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: Leva Users
Subjects with pure urge urinary incontinence (UUI) or urge-predominant mixed urinary incontinence (U-MUI) who are candidates for pelvic floor physical therapy or other first line treatments for UUI/U-MUI use the leva® system twice-daily at home in addition to behavioral therapies for 8 weeks.
|
The leva® Pelvic Digital Health System by Renovia Inc is a novel tool for subjects with urinary incontinence to train and strengthen pelvic floor muscles via directional mechano-transductive feedback on performance in the privacy of their own homes.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Urogenital Distress Inventory
Time Frame: Change from Baseline UDI score to 8 weeks and 6 months post-intervention
|
The Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI) is a 19-item questionnaire assessing subjective symptoms of pelvic floor disorders including incontinence.
The 19 items fall into one of three subscales (Irritative symptoms, Obstructive symptoms, and Stress Symptoms). .
The subject responds to each item by choosing from one of four answer options from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating a greater severity of symptom.
For scoring, first each subscale score is calculated by finding the mean score of items within the subscale section, subtracting 1, and multiplying that by 100/3.
Next, the subscale scores are summed to determine the overall UDI score with possible scores ranging from 0-300.
High scores indicate greater symptoms severity.
|
Change from Baseline UDI score to 8 weeks and 6 months post-intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Incontinence Impact Questionnaire Short Form (IIQ-7)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline IIQ-7 score to 8 weeks and 6 months post-intervention
|
Validated short-form version of the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire used to describe incontinence-related quality of life.
It consists of 7 items assessing four general areas including travel, social, emotional, and physical activities.
For each item, the subject responds by choosing from one of four answer options from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating a greater severity of symptom.
Scores are generated by finding the mean score for each item and multiplying that by 100/3.
Higher scores indicate greater negative impact on quality of life.
|
Change from Baseline IIQ-7 score to 8 weeks and 6 months post-intervention
|
Urge Urinary Incontinence Episode Frequency on a Three-Day Voiding Diary
Time Frame: Change from Baseline urge urinary incontinence episode frequency to 8 weeks and 6 months post-intervention
|
A voiding diary is considered standard of care in the work-up of a patient with incontinence to better characterize real-life drinking and voiding habits.
The number of urge urinary incontinence episodes is determined by adding up the incontinence episodes recorded by the patient that were associated with an urge to get to the bathroom.
More incontinence episodes means a greater severity of incontinence
|
Change from Baseline urge urinary incontinence episode frequency to 8 weeks and 6 months post-intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Anne M Stachowicz, MD, Urogynecology Fellow
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Uebersax JS, Wyman JF, Shumaker SA, McClish DK, Fantl JA. Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in women: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program for Women Research Group. Neurourol Urodyn. 1995;14(2):131-9. doi: 10.1002/nau.1930140206.
- Shumaker SA, Wyman JF, Uebersax JS, McClish D, Fantl JA. Health-related quality of life measures for women with urinary incontinence: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program in Women (CPW) Research Group. Qual Life Res. 1994 Oct;3(5):291-306. doi: 10.1007/BF00451721.
- Milsom I, Coyne KS, Nicholson S, Kvasz M, Chen CI, Wein AJ. Global prevalence and economic burden of urgency urinary incontinence: a systematic review. Eur Urol. 2014 Jan;65(1):79-95. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.08.031. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
- Monteiro S, Riccetto C, Araujo A, Galo L, Brito N, Botelho S. Efficacy of pelvic floor muscle training in women with overactive bladder syndrome: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Nov;29(11):1565-1573. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3602-x. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
- Kammerer-Doak D, Rizk DE, Sorinola O, Agur W, Ismail S, Bazi T. Mixed urinary incontinence: international urogynecological association research and development committee opinion. Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Oct;25(10):1303-12. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2485-8. Epub 2014 Aug 5.
- Lamin E, Parrillo LM, Newman DK, Smith AL. Pelvic Floor Muscle Training: Underutilization in the USA. Curr Urol Rep. 2016 Feb;17(2):10. doi: 10.1007/s11934-015-0572-0.
- Rosenblatt P, Pulliam S, McKinney J, Sutherland R, Iglesias R. The leva incontinence system for the treatment of mild to moderate urinary incontinence: A pilot study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg.
- Dyer KY, Xu Y, Brubaker L, Nygaard I, Markland A, Rahn D, Chai TC, Stoddard A, Lukacz E; Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network (UITN). Minimum important difference for validated instruments in women with urge incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011 Sep;30(7):1319-24. doi: 10.1002/nau.21028. Epub 2011 May 11.
- Jimenez-Cidre MA, Lopez-Fando L, Esteban-Fuertes M, Prieto-Chaparro L, Llorens-Martinez FJ, Salinas-Casado J, Castro-Diaz D, Muller-Arteaga C, Adot-Zurbano JM, Rodriguez-Escobar F, Gutierrez C, Arlandis-Guzman S, Bonillo-Garcia MA, Madurga-Patuel B, Leva-Vallejo M, Franco de Castro A, Peri-Cusi L, Conejero-Sugranes J, Jimenez-Calvo J, Rebollo P, Mora A. The 3-day bladder diary is a feasible, reliable and valid tool to evaluate the lower urinary tract symptoms in women. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015 Feb;34(2):128-32. doi: 10.1002/nau.22530. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
- Hundley AF, Wu JM, Visco AG. A comparison of perineometer to brink score for assessment of pelvic floor muscle strength. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 May;192(5):1583-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.11.015.
- Brink CA, Sampselle CM, Wells TJ, Diokno AC, Gillis GL. A digital test for pelvic muscle strength in older women with urinary incontinence. Nurs Res. 1989 Jul-Aug;38(4):196-9.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
June 6, 2019
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
May 4, 2020
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
May 4, 2020
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 18, 2019
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 18, 2019
First Posted (ACTUAL)
April 22, 2019
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
July 1, 2020
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 30, 2020
Last Verified
June 1, 2020
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 18-71
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Overactive Bladder
-
Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt UniversityCompletedOveractive Bladder | Overactive Detrusor | Overactive Bladder SyndromeTurkey
-
Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris...CompletedOveractive Bladder (OAB)United States, Canada, Germany, Korea, Republic of, Spain, Turkey, Taiwan, Italy, Slovakia, Denmark, South Africa, United Kingdom, Mexico, Sweden, Norway
-
Medstar Health Research InstituteColumbia University; University of Michigan; University of New Mexico; Methodist...Terminated
-
Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc.CompletedOveractive Bladder (OAB)United States, Canada
-
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCTerminatedOveractive Bladder | Overactive Urinary Bladder
-
Loyola UniversityAstellas Pharma IncCompletedOveractive Bladder SyndromeUnited States
-
Beijing Pins Medical Co., LtdUnknown
-
Maastricht University Medical CenterUnknownLower Urinary Tract Symptoms | Overactive Bladder SyndromeNetherlands
-
Pamukkale UniversityCompletedElectrical Stimulation | Idiopathic Overactive Bladder | Bladder TrainingTurkey
Clinical Trials on Leva device
-
University of OklahomaRenovia, Inc.Completed
-
Renovia, Inc.UnknownFecal IncontinenceUnited States
-
Renovia, Inc.CompletedStress Urinary Incontinence | Mixed Urinary IncontinenceUnited States
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonRecruiting
-
Renovia, Inc.CompletedStress Urinary IncontinenceUnited States
-
Renovia, Inc.University of Alabama at Birmingham; OBVIO HEALTH USA, Inc.CompletedStress Urinary IncontinenceUnited States
-
Vastra Gotaland RegionNot yet recruiting
-
Facet TechnologiesLifeScanCompletedDiabetesUnited States
-
Karolinska InstitutetUnknownDegenerative Disc Disease | Discogenic Low Back PainSweden
-
AOTI Ltd.UnknownDiabetic Foot UlcerUnited Kingdom, United States, Germany, France, Luxembourg