- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03960970
Two-drug Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Scheduled Cesarean Deliveries
September 15, 2019 updated by: Tali Wajsfeld, RWJ Barnabas Health at Jersey City Medical Center
Azithromycin-based Extended-spectrum Prophylaxis in Scheduled Cesarean Deliveries
Cesarean deliveries are the most common surgical procedure performed in the United States.
A significant decrease in cesarean delivery associated maternal morbidity has been achieved with preoperative prophylactic single-dose cephalosporin, widely used before skin incision.
Also, on laboring patients and/or with rupture of membranes, several studies suggest that adding azithromycin to standard cephalosporin prophylaxis is cost-effective and reduces overall rates of endometritis, wound infection, readmission, use of antibiotics and serious maternal events.
Azithromycin has effective coverage against Ureaplasma, associated with increased rates of endometritis.
Although two-drug regimen has been suggested for laboring and/or patients that undergo cesarean delivery, no studies have investigated the potential benefits of two-drug regimen in non-laboring patients.
Study Overview
Status
Unknown
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Cesarean deliveries are the most common surgical procedure performed in the United States, and scheduled cesarean deliveries account for at least 40% of all cesarean deliveries every year.
A significant decrease in cesarean delivery associated maternal morbidity has been achieved with preoperative prophylactic single-dose cephalosporin given within 60 minutes of skin incision.
Also, on laboring patients and/or with rupture of membranes, several studies suggest that adding azithromycin to standard cephalosporin prophylaxis is not only cost-effective but reduces overall rates of endometritis and wound infection.
Azithromycin provides effective coverage against Ureaplasma, commonly associated with increased rates of endometritis.
Although two-drug regimen has been suggested for laboring and/or patients that undergo cesarean delivery, no studies have investigated the potential benefits of two-drug regimen in non-laboring patients.
No increase in neonatal morbidity was noted with adjunctive azithromycin prophylaxis, including adverse events.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
800
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Tali Wajsfeld, MD
- Phone Number: 2340 2019152000
- Email: tali.wajsfeld@rwjbh.org
Study Locations
-
-
New Jersey
-
Jersey City, New Jersey, United States, 07302
- Recruiting
- Jersey City Medical Center
-
Contact:
- Tali Wajsfeld, MD
- Phone Number: 201-915-2340
- Email: tali.wajsfeld@rwjbh.org
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant women 18 years or older
- Women undergoing primary or repeat cesarean delivery
- Singleton gestation
- Gestational age greater than 34 weeks
- Pregnant patients undergoing scheduled cesarean delivery
- Intact membranes
- Non-laboring
- Signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Maternal age < 18 years
- Multi-fetal gestation
- Known allergy to cephalosporin or azithromycin
- Patient unwilling or unable to provide consent
- Diagnosis of rupture of membranes
- Intraamniotic infection, or any other active bacterial infection (e.g. pyelonephritis, pneumonia, abscess) at time of randomization.
- Immunocompromising medical conditions: HIV positive with CD4 count below 200, chronic steroid use, current diagnosis of cancer and/or chemotherapy age use
- Emergent cesarean precluding consent or availability of study medication
- Need for hysterectomy at time of delivery
- Use of antibiotic in the 72 hours prior to admission, with exception to patient receiving antibiotics for GBS
- Inability to contact patient on postpartum period.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: One-drug Prophylaxis
Mefoxin 2g IV, Piggyback, once
|
Standard Prophylaxis
Other Names:
|
Experimental: Two-drug Prophylaxis
Mefoxin 2g IV, Piggyback, once and Azithromycin 500mg IV, Piggyback, once
|
Standard Prophylaxis
Other Names:
Additional IV Azithromycin 500 mg to Standard Prophylaxis
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Rates of Endometritis
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks after delivery
|
Presence of at least two of the following signs with no other recognized cause: fever (temperature of at least 38°C [100.4°F]),
abdominal pain, uterine tenderness, or purulent drainage from the uterus.
|
Up to 6 weeks after delivery
|
Rates of Wound Infection
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks after delivery
|
Presence of either superficial or deep incisional surgical-site infection characterized by cellulitis or erythema and induration around the incision or purulent discharge from the incision site with or without fever and included necrotizing fasciitis.
Wound hematoma, seroma, abscess or breakdown alone in the absence of the preceding signs did not constitute infection.
|
Up to 6 weeks after delivery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Rates of Maternal Fever
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks after delivery
|
Temperature equal or greater than 100.4F
|
Up to 6 weeks after delivery
|
Rates of Maternal Postpartum Readmission or Unscheduled Visit
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks after delivery
|
Admission to hospital or unscheduled appointment in additional to regular 1-week and 6-week postpartum visit
|
Up to 6 weeks after delivery
|
Rates of Postpartum Antibiotic Use
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks after delivery
|
Antibiotic use for any reason including other infections such as UTI and sepsis.
|
Up to 6 weeks after delivery
|
Rates of Serious Adverse Events
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks after delivery
|
MICU admission, thromboembolic events, sepsis, maternal death
|
Up to 6 weeks after delivery
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Rates of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) Admission
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks after delivery
|
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) Admission rather than prematurity
|
Up to 6 weeks after delivery
|
Rates of Neonatal Readmission
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks after delivery
|
Hospital readmission within 6 weeks of birth
|
Up to 6 weeks after delivery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Tali Wajsfeld, MD, RWJ Barnabas Health at Jersey City Medical Center
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Smaill FM, Grivell RM. Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 28;2014(10):CD007482. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007482.pub3.
- Tita ATN, Rouse DJ, Blackwell S, Saade GR, Spong CY, Andrews WW. Emerging concepts in antibiotic prophylaxis for cesarean delivery: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Mar;113(3):675-682. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318197c3b6.
- Tita AT, Szychowski JM, Boggess K, Saade G, Longo S, Clark E, Esplin S, Cleary K, Wapner R, Letson K, Owens M, Abramovici A, Ambalavanan N, Cutter G, Andrews W; C/SOAP Trial Consortium. Adjunctive Azithromycin Prophylaxis for Cesarean Delivery. N Engl J Med. 2016 Sep 29;375(13):1231-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602044.
- Harper LM, Kilgore M, Szychowski JM, Andrews WW, Tita ATN. Economic Evaluation of Adjunctive Azithromycin Prophylaxis for Cesarean Delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Aug;130(2):328-334. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002129.
- Andrews WW, Hauth JC, Cliver SP, Savage K, Goldenberg RL. Randomized clinical trial of extended spectrum antibiotic prophylaxis with coverage for Ureaplasma urealyticum to reduce post-cesarean delivery endometritis. Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jun;101(6):1183-9. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00016-4.
- Tita AT, Hauth JC, Grimes A, Owen J, Stamm AM, Andrews WW. Decreasing incidence of postcesarean endometritis with extended-spectrum antibiotic prophylaxis. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jan;111(1):51-6. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000295868.43851.39.
- Andrews WW, Shah SR, Goldenberg RL, Cliver SP, Hauth JC, Cassell GH. Association of post-cesarean delivery endometritis with colonization of the chorioamnion by Ureaplasma urealyticum. Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Apr;85(4):509-14. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(94)00436-H.
- Sutton AL, Acosta EP, Larson KB, Kerstner-Wood CD, Tita AT, Biggio JR. Perinatal pharmacokinetics of azithromycin for cesarean prophylaxis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jun;212(6):812.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.015. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
- ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 120: Use of prophylactic antibiotics in labor and delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jun;117(6):1472-1483. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182238c31. No abstract available.
- Boggess KA, Tita A, Jauk V, Saade G, Longo S, Clark EAS, Esplin S, Cleary K, Wapner R, Letson K, Owens M, Blackwell S, Beamon C, Szychowski JM, Andrews W; Cesarean Section Optimal Antibiotic Prophylaxis Trial Consortium. Risk Factors for Postcesarean Maternal Infection in a Trial of Extended-Spectrum Antibiotic Prophylaxis. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Mar;129(3):481-485. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001899.
- Skeith AE, Niu B, Valent AM, Tuuli MG, Caughey AB. Adding Azithromycin to Cephalosporin for Cesarean Delivery Infection Prophylaxis: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec;130(6):1279-1284. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002333.
- Smith C, Egunsola O, Choonara I, Kotecha S, Jacqz-Aigrain E, Sammons H. Use and safety of azithromycin in neonates: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2015 Dec 9;5(12):e008194. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008194.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
September 15, 2019
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
September 30, 2019
Study Completion (Anticipated)
November 30, 2020
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
May 21, 2019
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 21, 2019
First Posted (Actual)
May 23, 2019
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
September 17, 2019
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 15, 2019
Last Verified
September 1, 2019
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Prophylaxis Trial
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
No
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Wound Infection
-
Pulmatrix Inc.TerminatedPost Operative Wound Infection | Postoperative Wound Infection-deepUnited States
-
Carilion ClinicSmith & Nephew, Inc.; DeRoyal Industries, Inc.CompletedImpaired Wound Healing | Postoperative Wound Infection-deepUnited States
-
HITEC-Institute of Medical SciencesCompletedWound Infection | Wound Dehiscence | Wound Surgical | Wound BleedingPakistan
-
PolyPid Ltd.CompletedPostoperative Wound Infection Superficial Incisional | Postoperative Wound Infection Deep Incisional Surgical SiteIsrael
-
Universitat Internacional de CatalunyaHospital de GranollersCompletedSurgical Wound Infection | Postoperative Wound Infection | Postoperative Wound Infection Superficial Incisional | Preventive TherapySpain
-
Children's Healthcare of AtlantaWithdrawnPostoperative Wound InfectionUnited States
-
Military Medical AcademyRecruitingPostoperative Wound Infection Superficial Incisional | Postoperative Wound Infection Deep Incisional Surgical SiteBulgaria
-
PfizerCompletedSurgical Wound Infection | Postoperative Wound Infection
-
Hospital for Special Surgery, New YorkNew York Presbyterian HospitalRecruitingSurgical Wound | Post Operative Wound InfectionUnited States
-
Brentwood Biomedical Research InstituteCompletedPostoperative Wound Infection | Traumatic Wound Infection | Closed Soft Tissue AbscessUnited States
Clinical Trials on Mefoxin 2g
-
Housey Healthcare ULCGlycemic Index Laboratories, IncCompletedInsulin Resistance, DiabetesCanada
-
Oregon Health and Science UniversityNational Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)TerminatedCognitive Impairment | ElderlyUnited States
-
Oregon Health and Science UniversityActive, not recruiting
-
Ewha Womans UniversityUnknownKidney Failure, ChronicKorea, Republic of
-
B. Braun Medical Inc.ParexelCompleted
-
Herzog HospitalCompleted
-
Herzog HospitalCompleted
-
Russell SwerdlowCompleted
-
Chinese University of Hong KongCompleted