- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03974763
Function and Form Outcomes in Patients With Facial Paralysis
This study will be unique for the rehabilitation of patients with facial paralysis in that the focus is to generate novel 3D facial soft tissue measures to characterize the condition and temporal changes, and on the generation of future testable hypotheses to optimize surgical interventions and outcomes. In addition, the investigators will extend our previous work, beyond the facial circumoral and lip areas/zones, to characterize additional facial zones specific for facial paralysis.
The approach for facial mapping of soft tissue movement, when validated through this proposed study, can be used for both surgical planning and to support the development and training of implantable facial pacing devices. Mapping both normal facial movements and movements of patients with unilateral facial paralysis are vital to describe the temporal and spatial course of the recovery process. Ultimately, this information can be used to inform clinicians on the precise placement of these devices and the signal strength needed to facilitate movements in the required 'paralyzed' facial zones until the recovery process has been completed.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02111
- Tufts University School of Dental Medicine
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Patients with Facial Paralysis Inclusion criteria
- A diagnosis of virally triggered, acute, unilateral facial paralysis (Bell's Palsy)
- Able to attend baseline visit at Tufts within 6 weeks of onset of the condition and with an estimated potential for recovery between 6-12 weeks
- Patient interest/willingness to participate in the study
- An ability to comprehend verbal instructions; and an age range of 18 to 75 years
Exclusion criteria
- Facial movement disorders due to primary muscular dysfunction or hemifacial spasm in the absence of synkinesis
- Complaints of facial paralysis but no evidence of weakness on physical examination
- Previous facial soft tissue surgery and/or Orthognathic surgery
- Mental or hearing impairment to the extent that comprehension or ability to perform the tests is hampered
Control Participants Inclusion criteria
- Subject interest/willingness to participate in the study
- An ability to comprehend verbal instructions
- An age range of 18 to 75 years
Exclusion criteria
- Facial soft tissue surgery, orthognathic surgery, and/or facial soft tissue disorder
- Mental or hearing impairment to the extent that comprehension or ability to perform the tests is hampered
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Case-Control
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
---|
Test Group
Patients with acute, unilateral, facial paralysis (Bell's Palsy)
|
Control Group
A group of age- and sex-frequency matched 'normal' controls.
Based on past research, gender and age are possible confounders of facial movement/function.
Thus, the control group will be frequency-matched to the patient group on gender and age.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
To quantitatively evaluate the range of facial soft tissue disability in patients with acute, unilateral, flaccid facial paralysis and track the changes over time (3-month recovery period).
Time Frame: December 2019
|
First outcome measure for facial soft tissue disability = Maximum displacement (mm)
|
December 2019
|
To quantitatively evaluate the range of facial soft tissue disability in patients with acute, unilateral, flaccid facial paralysis and track the changes over time (3-month recovery period).
Time Frame: December 2019
|
Second outcome measure for facial soft tissue disability = velocity (mm/s)
|
December 2019
|
To quantitatively evaluate the range of facial soft tissue disability in patients with acute, unilateral, flaccid facial paralysis and track the changes over time (3-month recovery period).
Time Frame: December 2019
|
Third outcome measure for facial soft tissue disability = and asymmetry of facial soft tissue landmarks (this is a ratio measure)
|
December 2019
|
To compare the facial disability in the patients with a group of age- and sex-frequency matched normal subjects.
Time Frame: December 2019
|
First outcome measure for group comparison = difference in maximum displacement (mm) between patients with facial disability and control group subjects
|
December 2019
|
To compare the facial disability in the patients with a group of age- and sex-frequency matched normal subjects.
Time Frame: December 2019
|
Second outcome measure for group comparison = velocity (mm/s)
|
December 2019
|
To compare the facial disability in the patients with a group of age- and sex-frequency matched normal subjects.
Time Frame: December 2019
|
Third outcome measure for group comparison = asymmetry of facial soft tissue landmarks (ratio)
|
December 2019
|
In patients with acute, unilateral, flaccid facial paralysis, to compare the current, qualitative, clinical assessment methods for facial disability.
Time Frame: December 2019
|
First outcome measure = average correlation across surgeons for their ratings on the House-Brackman scale and the patients' mean measures of maximum displacement
|
December 2019
|
In patients with acute, unilateral, flaccid facial paralysis, to compare the current, qualitative, clinical assessment methods for facial disability.
Time Frame: December 2019
|
Second outcome measure = average correlation across surgeons for their ratings on the House-Brackman scale and the patients' mean measures of velocity
|
December 2019
|
In patients with acute, unilateral, flaccid facial paralysis, to compare the current, qualitative, clinical assessment methods for facial disability.
Time Frame: December 2019
|
Third outcome measure = average correlation across surgeons for their ratings on the House-Brackman scale and the patients' mean measures of asymmetry of facial soft tissue landmarks
|
December 2019
|
In patients with acute, unilateral, flaccid facial paralysis, to compare the current, qualitative, clinical assessment methods for facial disability.
Time Frame: December 2019
|
Fourth outcome measure = average correlation across surgeons for their ratings on the Sunnybrook Facial Grading System and the patients' mean measures of maximum displacement
|
December 2019
|
In patients with acute, unilateral, flaccid facial paralysis, to compare the current, qualitative, clinical assessment methods for facial disability.
Time Frame: December 2019
|
Fifth outcome measure = average correlation across surgeons for their ratings on the Sunnybrook Facial Grading System and the patients' mean measures of velocity
|
December 2019
|
In patients with acute, unilateral, flaccid facial paralysis, to compare the current, qualitative, clinical assessment methods for facial disability.
Time Frame: December 2019
|
Sixth outcome measure = average correlation across surgeons for their ratings on the Sunnybrook Facial Grading System and the patients' mean measures of asymmetry of facial soft tissue landmarks
|
December 2019
|
To assess perceptions of facial appearance over time in patients with acute, unilateral, flaccid facial paralysis and to compare these perceptions with those of control subjects.
Time Frame: December 2019
|
Measurement Tools: SP36 questionnaire, FaCE questionnaire.
|
December 2019
|
To assess perceptions of quality of life over time in patients with acute, unilateral, flaccid facial paralysis and to compare these perceptions with those of control subjects.
Time Frame: December 2019
|
Measurement Tools: PSP questionnaire.
|
December 2019
|
To correlate the patients' perceptions over time with the quantitative measures of facial disability.
Time Frame: December 2019
|
Relationship between the quantitative measurements of facial movement with the quality of life and patient perception measures.
This relationship will be measured using the linear mixed effects model or generalized estimating equations as appropriate.
|
December 2019
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Carroll Ann Trotman, Tufts University School of Dental Medicine
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 11299 (DAIDS ES Registry Number)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Bell Palsy
-
Universidad de la RepublicaCompleted
-
Lama Saad El-Din MahmoudCompletedBell's Palsy | Facial Nerve PalsyEgypt
-
Minia UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
The Third Affiliated hospital of Zhejiang Chinese...Zhejiang University; The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical...Not yet recruiting
-
University Hospital, MontpellierRecruiting
-
Oregon Health and Science UniversityTerminated
-
Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research HospitalCompleted
-
Wenzhou Medical UniversityCompleted
-
Beijing Tongren HospitalCompleted
-
Riphah International UniversityCompleted