Intravenous Infusion of Lidocaine in ERCP

September 20, 2019 updated by: Yanqing Li, Shandong University

Efficacy of Intravenous Infusion of Lidocaine in Sedation for ERCP: a Randomised Placebo-controlled Study

Intravenous infusion of lidocaine significantly reduces propofol dose for ERCP and improve patients' recovery after ERCP.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study divide patients into two groups, one will be given lidocaine; another group was given placebo . to observe two groups of patients blood pressure, body movement, and propofol dosage , and the difference in operator satisfaction, and how many people need to give fentanyl again; and two groups of patients after the operation of the reaction, if there are dizziness, nausea, and other adverse reactions; finally, the differences of these two schemes in different populations were analyzed, and the rationalization and individualized medication will be put forward.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Jinan, China
        • Recruiting
        • Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
        • Contact:
          • Yanqing Li
    • Shandong
      • Jinan, Shandong, China, 250012
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:Inpatients aged >18 years who were scheduled for ERCP at Qilu hospital.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with ASA class 4 or 5,
  • Patients with pre-existing hypoxaemia (SpO2<90%),
  • Patients with hypotension (SBP<90mmHg)
  • Patients with bradycardia (HR<50 bpm)
  • patients with severe chronic renal failure (creatinine clearance<30 ml/min)
  • patients with uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure>170 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure>100 mm Hg)
  • patients with pregnancy or lactation
  • Patients hemodynamically unstable
  • Patients unable to give informed consent
  • Patients with a history of drug allergies;

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: control group
the control group will be given the same volume of saline as the experimental group
the control group will be given the same volume of saline.
Other Names:
  • saline
Experimental: Experimental: lidocaine group
the experimental group will be given l-1.5mg lidocaine and then 2mg/kg/h
the experimental group will be given 1-1.5mg/kg lidocaine and then 2mg/kg/h
Other Names:
  • Compound Lidocaine Hydrochloride Injiection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
propofol consumption difference between the two groups
Time Frame: half a year
the total propofol dosage consumption between the two groups
half a year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety assessed by the rate of hypotention during the procedure
Time Frame: half a year
Hypotension, defined as systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg
half a year
Safety assessed by the rate of breadycardia during the procedure
Time Frame: half a year
Bradycardia, defined as heart rate <50 beats/min
half a year
Safety assessed by the rate of involuntary movement during the procedure
Time Frame: half a year
Involuntary movements, defined as unconscious movements requiring restraint or severe limb movement interrupting the endoscopy procedure
half a year
Safety assessed by the rate of required airway management during the procedure
Time Frame: half a year
Required airway management such as jaw lifting, mask ventilation, or tracheal intubation in severe hypoxia Required airway management such as jaw lifting, mask ventilation, or tracheal intubation in severe hypoxia
half a year
endoscopists satisfaction assessed by the performer
Time Frame: half a year
the endoscopists satisfacition score were assessed on a 0-10VAS after the procedure
half a year
patient satisfaction assessed by the patient
Time Frame: half a year
the patient satisfacition score were assessed on a 0-10VAS 30mins after the procedure
half a year
fatigue score after the ERCP
Time Frame: half a year
fatigue were measured on a 0-10VAS at arrival in the recovery room ,30min later
half a year
Safety assessed by the rate of hypoxia during the procedure Safety assessed by the rate of hypoxia during the procedure
Time Frame: half a year
Hypoxia, defined as peripheral oxygen saturation <90% for >30 seconds
half a year
pain socre after the ERCP
Time Frame: half a year
pain were measured on a 0-10VAS at arrival in the recovery room ,30min later
half a year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Yanqing Li, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 15, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 15, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 15, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 18, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 20, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

June 25, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 23, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 20, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sedation

Clinical Trials on placebo

3
Subscribe