Gluteal Turnover Flap for Closure of the Perineal Wound After Abdominoperineal Resection for Rectal Cancer (BIOPEX2)

Background:

About 700 patients per year undergo an abdominoperineal resection (APR) for distal rectal cancer (Dutch Colorectal Audit 2016).Neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy is often used to further improve locoregional control. Morbidity after APR is substantial and mainly consisting of perineal wound problems in about 35% of the patients. lf primary healing of the perineal wound after APR doesn't occur, secondary healing can take up to one year, and there is even a small proportion of patients in whom a chronic perineal wound or fistula persists after one year. During this long period, intensive wound care is necessary. This results in a heavy burden on both patient and health care resources.

Objective:

The high morbidity rate of the perineal wound has resulted in a continuing discussion on how to close the perineal defect after APR. Our research group recently published the BIOPEX-study (NL42094.018.12), in which 104 patients were randomized between primary perinea! wound closure and biological mesh closure of the pelvic floor after APR with preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer. Similar uncomplicated perineal wound healing rate at 30 days (Southampton wound score < 2) was found: 63% versus 66%, respectively. The hypothesis behind this negative trial result is related to the perineal dead space between the skin and the biological mesh. Fluid will accumulate in this dead space with the risk of secondary contamination and abscess formation, leading to wound dehiscence and purulent discharge. Autologous tissue flaps have been suggested to improve perineal wound healing based on several cohort studies. At least in the Netherlands, these flaps are used only for selected patients with the large defects and highest risk of wound problems, because of the more extensive surgery with added surgical trauma and operative time, and associated donor site morbidity. For these reasons, primary perineal closure (control arm of BIOPEX) is still the standard of care in the Netherlands.

A gluteal turnover flap (GT flap) is a small transposition flap trom the unilateral adjacent perineal skin and subcutaneous fat, which is flipped into the perineal dead space, and stitched with the de-epithelialised dermis to the contralateral pelvic floor remnant. Subsequently, the perineal subcutaneous fat and skin are closed over the flap in the midline, thereby not adding a donor site scar. A small pilot study trom our group showed that this is a promising solution for routine perineal closure after APR.

Study design:

In this multicenter single blinded study, eligible patients will be randomized between pelvic floor reconstruction using a GT flap (intervention arm) and primary closure of the perineal defect (standard arm). The perineal wound healing will be evaluated at 14 days and 1, 3, and 6 months post-operatively using the Southampton wound scoring system by an independent observer.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

160

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Noord-Holland
      • Amsterdam-Zuidoost, Noord-Holland, Netherlands, 1105AZ

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • clinical diagnosis of primary rectal cancer or recurrent rectal cancer
  • scheduled for abdominalperineal resection
  • older then 18 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • intersphincteric APR
  • (biological) mesh placement
  • extended resections (sacral resection except for coccyx resection, (posterior) exenteration)
  • severe systemic diseases affecting wound healing except diabetes (i.e. renal failure requiring dialysis, liver cirrhosis, and immune compromised status like HIV), collagen disorders (i.e. Marfan)
  • enrolment in other trials with overlapping primary endpoint.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Primary closure
Primary perineal closure after extralevator abdomino perineal resection
Experimental: Gluteal turnover flap
Gluteal flap reconstruction of the pelvic floor after extralevator abdomino perineal resection
Link to procedure: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7_vH2_1ZZc

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perineal wound healing rate 30 days
Time Frame: 30 days
The primary endpoint of the study is the percentage of uncomplicated perineal wound healing defined as a Southampton wound score of less than Il at 30 days postoperatively.
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perineal wound healing
Time Frame: 14 days, 3 and 6 months postoperatively
Southampton wound score
14 days, 3 and 6 months postoperatively
Re-intervention or re-admission rate
Time Frame: 1,3,6 months
Need tor re-intervention or re-admission related to pre-sacral abscess or either perineal wound problems.
1,3,6 months
Perineal hernia rate
Time Frame: 1,3,6 months
lncidence of symptomatic and asymptomatic perineal hernia
1,3,6 months
Health-related quality of life
Time Frame: 1,3,6 months
questionnaires: The 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L)
1,3,6 months
Quality of Life in cancer patients
Time Frame: 1,3,6 months
questionnaires: European Organization for Research and Treatment for Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (C30-QL2, CR29)
1,3,6 months
Generic quality of Life
Time Frame: 3,6 months
questionnaires: Short Form Survey (SF36)
3,6 months
Urogenital Distress
Time Frame: 1,3,6 months
questionnaires: Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6)
1,3,6 months
Incontinence scale
Time Frame: 1,3,6 months
questionnaires:Incontinence Impact Questionnaire short form (IIQ-7)
1,3,6 months
Urogenital function
Time Frame: 1,3,6 months
questionnaires: international index of erectile function (IIEF)
1,3,6 months
Female sexual distress
Time Frame: 1,3,6 months
questionnaires: Female sexual distress scale (FSDS-R)
1,3,6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pieter Tanis, Prof. MD. Phd, Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 28, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 10, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

July 2, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 2, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rectal Cancer

Clinical Trials on Gluteal turnover flap

3
Subscribe