- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04029220
Navigation and Parent Peer Support to Promote Access
August 15, 2022 updated by: University of Colorado, Denver
Navigation and Parent Peer Support to Promote Access and Retention of Children in Mental Health Services
Nearly one in five children in the United States has a mental health problem that interferes with daily functioning and requires intervention, and yet less than 50% of children who need mental health care receive any services.
Families and especially from low-income and ethnically diverse backgrounds, experience a range of barriers to engaging in services for their children including: lack of recognition of problems and knowledge of available treatments, connecting to services, trust in providers, stigma; low income and ethnically diverse populations are especially affected by these barriers.
In this work, the investigators propose to carry out initial testing of a research- and theory-based model of Parent Peer Navigation services to help engage families with children with significant but pre-clinical problems in mental health services in order to prevent future poorer outcomes for children, who otherwise may never receive services, or only receive services when their mental health issues become severely debilitating for themselves and their family.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Parent peer navigation (PPN), provided by other caregivers who have lived experience raising a youth with mental health conditions, holds promise as a service that can aid in improving both youth and caregiver outcomes by overcoming system- and individual-level barriers to care.
This proposed study will support initial testing of a research- and theory- based Parent Peer Navigation (PPN) model created by one of the nation's leading advocacy organizations for caregivers of children and youth with mental health challenges, the federally funded Family-Run Executive Directors Leadership Association.
This model, called the National Parent Peer Support Practice Model (Practice Model) has an associated training program and aims to effectively engage parents/caregivers in necessary treatment for their children by helping them connect with assessment, treatment and community-based resources and prepare them to independently navigate the child serving system, community-based resources, and ongoing opportunities for support once the PPN provider is no longer involved.
The Practice Model incorporates five theory- and research-based components of support: (1) information/educational, (2) instructional/skills development; (3) emotional/ affirming, (4) instrumental; and (5) advocacy.
The study will focus on children in early stages of impairment as a result of mental health challenges for which prevention of further disability is possible.
It will take advantage of implementation of the Practice Model through two non-profit family-run organizations (FROs) and will occur in three phases, beginning with preparatory work to develop recruitment strategies in collaboration with local schools, formalize implementation outcomes (acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, fidelity) and other measures followed by a Feasibility Study to finalize recruitment, procedures and measurement frames.
Finally, in Phase 3, the investigators will conduct a cluster randomized trial to provide a preliminary test of the impact of the Practice Model on key caregiver and child outcomes.
Children who are experiencing mental health challenges but have not had exposure to formal mental health services will be identified by collaborating schools and FROs/FSOs and referred for family support.
Consenting families will be randomly assigned to a treatment group who will receive PPN services based on the Practice Model from participating FROs, or a comparison group who will be referred to a Family Support Organization which provide other types of resources (e.g., referrals, information).
The investigators predict that youth and parents receiving PPN will show significantly greater rates of access, engagement and retention in services as compared to the comparison group.
The investigators also predict that at 6 months following PPN onset, children in the treatment group will exhibit improved social/emotional functioning and that parents in the treatment group will exhibit increased empowerment and decreased parenting stress, as compared to those in the comparison group.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
240
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Bruno Anthony
- Phone Number: 6255 1-800-624-6553
- Email: bruno.anthony@ucdenver.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Tennyson Dahlman, BA
- Phone Number: 7796 1-800-624-6553
- Email: tennyson.dahlman@cuanchutz.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Colorado
-
Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045-7106
- Recruiting
- University of Colorado School of Medicine
-
Contact:
- Bruno J Anthony, PhD
- Phone Number: 720-777-6255
- Email: bruno.anthony@ucdenver.edu
-
-
Oregon
-
Salem, Oregon, United States, 97302
- Not yet recruiting
- Oregon Family Support Network
-
Contact:
- Sandy Bumpus
- Phone Number: 503-363-8068
- Email: sandy.bumpus@ofsn.net
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
- Recruiting
- Allegheny Family Network
-
Contact:
- Ruth Fox
- Phone Number: 412-246-2030
- Email: rfox@alleghenyfamilynetwork.org
-
-
Wyoming
-
Cheyenne, Wyoming, United States, 82001
- Recruiting
- Uplift Wyoming
-
Contact:
- Michelle Heinen
- Phone Number: 307-778-8686
- Email: mheinen@upliftwy.org
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
1 year to 99 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
PPN provider:
- Over the age of 18 years
- Has experience in providing PPN services to families
- Has lived experience of having a child with mental health challenges
- Employed by the collaborating Family Run Organization
Parents/Caregivers:
- Over the age of 18 years,
- Have a child aged 1-13 with significant mental health symptoms and impairment but who has had no formal mental health treatment
Child:
- Aged 1-13 years
- Has significant mental health symptoms and impairment
- Has had no formal mental health treatment
Exclusion Criteria:
PPN provider:
- None
Parent:
- His or her child is in crisis needing more intense levels of care
- His or her child has been living continuously with parent for less than one year
Child:
- In crisis needed more intense levels of care
- Has been living continuously with parent for less than one year
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Parent Peer Navigation (PPN) by Family Run Organization
In this arm, families receive PPN services from a trained provider with lived experience whose role is to effectively engage parents/caregivers in necessary treatment for their children by helping them connect with assessment, treatment and community-based resources and prepare them to independently navigate the child serving system, community-based resources, and ongoing opportunities for support once the PPN is no longer involved.
PPN providers use the foundational competencies and skills to educate, inform and support families who are just entering the child-serving systems due to emerging behavioral health issues of their child.
|
Parent Peer Navigation (PPN) is implemented by trained providers with lived experience, who are supported by training and coaching protocols.
The role of PPN provider is to engage caregivers in necessary treatment for their children and prepare them to independently navigate the child serving system, community-based resources, and ongoing opportunities for support.
PPN providers will support families who are just entering he child-serving systems for 6 months on a weekly basis during which they will: help link families with formal and informal supports; instill confidence and coping skills; assist in the development of goals and crisis plans; and serve as an advocate for resolution of issues.
Also, the PPN provider helps the family to learn to navigate systems and advocate for their needs, prepares families for meetings and treatment sessions, helps identify ways for parents to practice self-care; and promotes family choice and shared decision making.
|
Active Comparator: Resources provided by Family Support Organization
The active comparator is service provided by Family Support Organizations (FSOs), which provide information and resources for families about disabilities, special education and other services as well as workshops and parent support groups.
Unlike PPN services, FSO staff members are not "veteran caregivers" of a child with mental health challenges, do not provide personalized service delivery, do not provide a comprehensive assessment of family needs, and do not prepare families to make use of services through support for their initial and continued involvement in them.
Finally, whereas PPNs participate in comprehensive training and coaching, training for FSO staff tends to be more general and consists primarily of being aware of local resources to which families may be referred.
|
Parent Peer Navigation (PPN) is implemented by trained providers with lived experience, who are supported by training and coaching protocols.
The role of PPN provider is to engage caregivers in necessary treatment for their children and prepare them to independently navigate the child serving system, community-based resources, and ongoing opportunities for support.
PPN providers will support families who are just entering he child-serving systems for 6 months on a weekly basis during which they will: help link families with formal and informal supports; instill confidence and coping skills; assist in the development of goals and crisis plans; and serve as an advocate for resolution of issues.
Also, the PPN provider helps the family to learn to navigate systems and advocate for their needs, prepares families for meetings and treatment sessions, helps identify ways for parents to practice self-care; and promotes family choice and shared decision making.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in Services Assessment for Children and Adolescents (SACA)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months and 6 months
|
The Brief Form of the Services Assessment for Children and Adolescents (SACA) obtains for each service setting, information about the specific type of service used, provider, duration and frequency of use, and reason for use.
Questions are asked not only about child involvement but those aspects of the service that require parent involvement.
|
Baseline, 3 months and 6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Working Alliance Inventory - Short Form (WAI-S): Change is being assessed
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
Engagement in the PPN intervention will be assessed with the Working Alliance Inventory, Short Form (WAI-S), a 12-item adaptation of the Working Alliance Inventory to assess: (1) agreement on goals; (2) agreement on tasks; and (3) the development of bond.
A total alliance score and subscales are available (goals, tasks, bond).
|
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
Family Journey Assessment (FJA): Change is being assessed
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
The FJA completed by PPN providers and family members tracks caregiver progress toward self-advocacy and self-efficacy with a 3-component structure, reflecting progress in the recognition of needs, collaboration to access help from formal and natural supports, and activation of skills to cope with stress, enhance resilience, and develop and carry out plans of care.
|
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
Family Empowerment Scale (FES): Change is being assessed
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
Two modules of the FES will be employed which measure parent's perception of their self-efficacy and competence in the context of mental health services.
Each has shown to have adequate reliability and validity and to be a predictor of positive change in children's problem behavior.
|
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
Social Support Questionnaire (SSQ): Change is being assessed
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
The revised short form of the Social Support Questionnaire is a 12-item instrument in which individuals are asked to list the people in their social network whom they perceive as helpful in six different areas and are also asked to rate their level of satisfaction with that support.
|
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
The Revised Short Form of the Caregiver Strain Questionnaire (CSQ):Change is being assessed
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
Part of the Peabody Treatment Progress Battery, the revised short form of the CSQ is a 7-item scale that assesses the degree of objective and subjective stress experienced by a caregiver as a result of the responsibilities related to caring for a child with behavioral problems.
|
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
Hope Scale: Change is being assessed
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
The Hope Scale measures positive beliefs about the future, with 12 items measuring a person's self-efficacy and strategic goal orientation with two subscales: (1) hope pathways: perceived ability to generate routes to surmount obstacles and obtain goals, and (2) hope agency: personal belief that one can initiate and sustain effort toward goals using selected routes.
|
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
School attendance: Change is being assessed
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
Suspensions, expulsions and attendance will be obtained directly from school records with parent permission
|
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
School suspension: Change is being assessed
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
Suspensions, expulsions and attendance will be obtained directly from school records with parent permission
|
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
School expulsion: Change is being assessed
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
Suspensions, expulsions and attendance will be obtained directly from school records with parent permission
|
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): Change is being assessed
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
The SDQ is a widely used, brief screening tool used with children ages 4 to 17 years.
Included are 25 items covering behavioral/emotional symptoms evenly divided into five scales: Emotional Symptoms, Conduct Problems, Hyperactivity, Peer Problems, and Prosocial Behavior.
The impact section addresses whether the relevant symptoms result in substantial functional impairment and impose significant family burden.
|
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
Youth Top Problems: Change is being assessed
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
A psychometrically adequate measure that empirically-derives parents primary issues related to their child, tracking changes in child functioning over time.
|
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Bruno J. Anthony, PhD, University of Colorado, Denver
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
February 18, 2020
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
December 31, 2022
Study Completion (Anticipated)
March 31, 2023
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 17, 2019
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 18, 2019
First Posted (Actual)
July 23, 2019
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 17, 2022
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 15, 2022
Last Verified
August 1, 2022
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 19-0972
- R34MH119431 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
No
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Mental Health
-
Chinese University of Hong KongNot yet recruitingMental Health Wellness 1 | Mental Well-being | Mental Health Issue | Precision Mental HealthHong Kong
-
King's College LondonCompletedMental Health Wellness 1 | Mental Health IssueUnited Kingdom
-
Chapin Hall at the University of ChicagoUniversity of ConnecticutCompletedMental Health | Physical Health
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentCompletedMental Health | Veterans Health | Rural HealthUnited States
-
National Taiwan Normal UniversityCompletedMental Health | Physical HealthTaiwan
-
Virginia Commonwealth UniversityCompletedMental Health DisordersUnited States
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...CompletedMental Health DisordersCongo
-
Norwegian University of Science and TechnologySt. Olavs HospitalCompletedMental Health DisordersNorway
-
University of WarwickKing's College London; KU Leuven; University Hospital, Montpellier; Erasmus Medical... and other collaboratorsUnknownMental Health Disorder | Mental Health ImpairmentIreland, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Germany, Belgium, Croatia, France, Italy
-
York UniversityCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); North York General HospitalCompletedMental Health DisordersCanada
Clinical Trials on Parent Peer Navigation
-
University of California, Los AngelesCompleted
-
University of California, San FranciscoNational Institutes of Health (NIH); ANOVA Health InstituteCompleted
-
Penn State UniversityCompleted
-
Montefiore Medical CenterCenters for Disease Control and PreventionCompletedHIV-1-infection | Pre-exposure ProphylaxisUnited States
-
University of California, San FranciscoNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Completed
-
University Health Network, TorontoCanadian Cancer Society (CCS); Young Adult Cancer CanadaNot yet recruitingSarcoma | Lymphoma | Breast Cancer | Testicular Cancer
-
CrescentCareRecruiting
-
Michigan State UniversityBrown UniversityRecruitingIndividuals With Serious Mental Illness Leaving JailsUnited States
-
University of California, San DiegoNational Cancer Institute (NCI); Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; University of... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruiting
-
Illinois Institute of TechnologyArizona State University; Thresholds Inc.RecruitingMental Disorder | Physical IllnessUnited States