Application of MRI for Musculoskeletal Involvement in SLE (RMNLES)

July 29, 2019 updated by: Patricia Corzo, Hospital del Mar

Application of MRI for Inflammatory Musculoskeletal Involvement in Systemic Lupus Erithematosus (SLE)

Articular involvement can reach up to 95% within the chronic multisystemic manifestations of SLE (1). Originally, a non-erosive pattern of articular inflammation was described, but the emergence of more sensitive imaging techniques, such as MRI (2, 3), show synovitis, erosions (hand: 47-48%, carpus 82-84% in SLE; and hand: 18%, carpus 97% in healthy individuals), bone oedema (hand: 4-5%, carpus 13-16% in SLE; and 0% in healthy individuals) and tenosynovitis (hand 47%, carpus 79%; not evaluated in healthy individuals) in patients with SLE (4, 5). Nowadays, a specific validated pattern of articular involvement associated with this disease does not yet exist, although it has begun to be studied. This research tries to evaluate the presence, frequency and distribution of inflammatory articular manifestations in SLE (erosions, bone oedema, synovitis or tenosynovitis) using MRI (6), with the objective of trying to establish a specific pattern for this disease, if it exists, that can shorten the diagnostic process. Moreover, it tries to characterise, if they exist, clinical differences between various patient groups according to their articular involvement.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE

  • Nowadays no valid classification system for SLE-related arthritis/tenosynovitis exists.
  • Data are not sufficient to establish an SLE-specific pattern of inflammatory involvement, similar to the pattern known for other inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
  • Erosive arthritis associated with SLE has been typically related to patients that meet the criteria both for SLE and RA - syndrome known as Rhupus; but only a few data exist that classify erosive involvement of articular inflammation of pure SLE.
  • No research exists that links the articular inflammatory pathology associated with SLE with its effect on quality of life (degree of fatigue and HAQ) or with the rest of manifestations and comorbidities associated with SLE.
  • Being able to predict the development of SLE-related arthritis/tenosynovitis would be very useful when it comes to establishing the clinical management, treatment and prognosis of patients with SLE.

OBJECTIVES

  • GENERAL:

    - To describe the kind of inflammatory articular involvement (synovitis/erosions/bone oedema/tenosynovitis) (6,7) and its frequency in patients affected by pure SLE (excluding Rhupus, mixed connective tissue disease, overlap syndromes).

  • SPECIFIC:

    • To propose, if possible, an SLE-specific typical pattern of articular involvement.
    • To establish clinical and serological differences (extra-articular manifestations, autoimmunity, treatment received, comorbidities and quality of life) according to the type of inflammatory articular involvement and in comparison to healthy individuals.
    • To evaluate the possible link between SLEDAI/SLICC scores and the involvement using MRI.

HYPOTHESIS

  • Patients with SLE have a specific inflammatory articular disease.
  • A SLE-specific pattern of articular involvement exists.
  • There are clinical and serological differences depending on the different patterns of articular involvement in SLE.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients affected by SLE (1982 revised criteria) with scheduled visits to the SLE specialized medical office at Hospital del Mar:

    • (pain+ / synovitis +): SLE patients with inflammatory pain and synovitis determined by the practitioner during physical examination of radius and ulna carpal joint and/or carpus and/or metacarpophalangeal joint and/or IP . Defining synovitis as pain and inflammation and/or deformity (present or existing over the past year) included in the clinical history
    • (pain + / synovitis -) SLE patients with inflammatory pain without determined synovitis . Current (or over the past year) pain in radius and ulna carpal joint and/or carpus and/or metacarpophalangeal joint and/or IP, with no synovitis
  • (pain - / synovitis -) SLE patients without inflammatory pain with normal physical examination currently or over the past year
  • Control patients, without SLE nor immediate relatives affected by systemic inflammatory diseases, who lack articular pain and have blood test with no elevation APR or autoimmunity +)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Jaccoud's arthropaty
  • RF + and/or ACPA +
  • Incomplete SLE, MCTD, overlap syndromes
  • Hand surgery
  • Current neoplasia
  • Non-rheumatoid systemic autoimmune diseases
  • Contraindication for MRI

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: pain+ / synovitis +
SLE patients with inflammatory pain and synovitis determined by the practitioner during physical examination of radius and ulna carpal joint and/or carpus and/or metacarpophalangeal joint and/or IP. Defining synovitis as pain and inflammation and/or deformity (present or existing over the past year) included in the clinical history
Carpus and fingers of non-dominating hand MRI with gadolinium contrast
Other Names:
  • hand MRI
Active Comparator: pain + / synovitis -
SLE patients with inflammatory pain without determined synovitis. Current (or over the past year) pain in radius and ulna carpal joint and/or carpus and/or metacarpophalangeal joint and/or IP, with no synovitis
Carpus and fingers of non-dominating hand MRI with gadolinium contrast
Other Names:
  • hand MRI
Active Comparator: pain - / synovitis -
SLE patients without inflammatory pain with normal physical examination currently or over the past year
Carpus and fingers of non-dominating hand MRI with gadolinium contrast
Other Names:
  • hand MRI
Placebo Comparator: healthy
control patients (healthy participants: no pain, no SLE, no family affected by systemic inflammatory disease, a blood test with no elevation APR or autoimmunity +)
Carpus and fingers of non-dominating hand MRI with gadolinium contrast
Other Names:
  • hand MRI

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
MRI inflamatory changes
Time Frame: 1 to 2 months after clinical assesment
synovitis, erosions, bone oedema, tenosynovitis
1 to 2 months after clinical assesment
SLE activity scale
Time Frame: at clinical assesment
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) Measures last 10 days disease activity (rating (Y/N) 24 items related to specific manifestations on 9 organs) From 0 (best) to 105 (worst)
at clinical assesment
SLE treatments used
Time Frame: at clinical assesment
Number (n and %) of participants using any approved treatments for SLE used since diagnosis
at clinical assesment
Fatigue
Time Frame: 2 weeks before the performance of MRI
Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS-9) Results from 9 (best) to 63 (worst): rating 9 items ranging from 1(best) to 7 (worst)
2 weeks before the performance of MRI
Quality of life scale
Time Frame: 2 weeks before the performance of MRI
modified health assessment questionnaire (MHAQ): Results from 0 (best) to 3 (worst): rating 9 items from 0 (best) to 3 (worst) (results given divided by 8)
2 weeks before the performance of MRI
SLE damage scale
Time Frame: at clinical assesment

Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) damage index:

Irreversible damage rated by: 42 items related to 12 organs: 0 (absent-best)/1 (present-worst), some of them can count 2 or 3 (worst) if recidivant.

From 0 (best) to 46 (worst)

at clinical assesment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Serological markers of disease activity: antinuclear antibodies (ANA)
Time Frame: 6 months prior to 6 months after assesment
ANA (dilution): given by titters (average titters comapred between groups)
6 months prior to 6 months after assesment
Systemic SLE manifestations
Time Frame: at clinical assesment
presence of renal, lung, skin, neurological, haematological manifestations since diagnostic (Yes/No)
at clinical assesment
Hand pain visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time Frame: at clinical assesment
VAS 0 (none) to 10 (maximum)
at clinical assesment
Serological markers of disease activity: Anti-double stranded DNA antibody (DNAds)
Time Frame: 6 months prior to 6 months after assesment (the closest to MRI)
Titters DNAds (UI/ml)
6 months prior to 6 months after assesment (the closest to MRI)
Serological markers of disease activity: Anti-Smith antibodies (Sm)
Time Frame: 6 months prior to 6 months after assesment (the closest to MRI)
Presence of Sm (Yes/No)
6 months prior to 6 months after assesment (the closest to MRI)
Serological markers of disease activity: complement 3 (C3)
Time Frame: 6 months prior to 6 months after assesment (the closest to MRI)
titters C3 (mg/dL)
6 months prior to 6 months after assesment (the closest to MRI)
Serological markers of disease activity: complement 4 (C4)
Time Frame: 6 months prior to 6 months after assesment (the closest to MRI)
titters C4 (mg/dl)
6 months prior to 6 months after assesment (the closest to MRI)
Serological markers of disease activity: erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)
Time Frame: 6 months prior to 6 months after assesment (the closest to MRI)
ESR (mm/h)
6 months prior to 6 months after assesment (the closest to MRI)
Serological markers of disease activity: C reactive protein (CRP)
Time Frame: 6 months prior to 6 months after assesment (the closest to MRI)
CRP (mg/dl)
6 months prior to 6 months after assesment (the closest to MRI)
Serological markers of disease activity:white cell blood count (WCBC)
Time Frame: 6 months prior to 6 months after assesment (the closest to MRI)
WCBC: cellsx10E9/L
6 months prior to 6 months after assesment (the closest to MRI)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: PAtricia corzo, MD, Hospital del Mar

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 23, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

July 29, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 31, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 29, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

IPD will be used for PhD investigations. IPD will not be shared with other researchers

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hand Rheumatism

Clinical Trials on Blood test

3
Subscribe