Sleep and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

July 21, 2021 updated by: Louise Strøm, Aarhus University Hospital

Sleep Disturbance and Its Association With Fatigue, Depressive Symptoms, and Clinical Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI) in Lung Cancer Patients

Sleep disturbances are prevalent in cancer patients and linked to levels of fatigue and depressive symptoms with a major impact on quality of life. A growing body of evidence links sleep disturbances with various health outcomes, including increased risk of depression, cancer, and overall mortality. Inflammation is suggested to be an underlying mechanism both driving and maintaining the symptom cluster of sleep disturbance, fatigue and depressive symptoms, as well as being bi-directionally linked to sleep. The main purpose of the present study is to investigate the prevalence of sleep disturbance and its association with psychological and physical symptoms as well as the clinical response to ICI in non-small-cell lung cancer patients (NSCLC), with a secondary aim of exploring the role of inflammation.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

A total of 240 cancer patients diagnosed with advanced NSCLC, referred to treatment with ICI will be enrolled in this prospective observational study. Patients will be assessed prior to initiation of treatment (baseline) and every third subsequent week, corresponding to each treatment cycle over a period of 18 weeks. Assessments will include questionnaires, sleep diaries, actigraphy, and blood and saliva samples to examine sleep, fatigue, psychological and physical symptoms, the sleep-wake-cycle, inflammation, and cortisol. Additionally, the patients will be asked to complete a reduced questionnaire every week within the 18 weeks period, to address weekly fluctuations in sleep quality, fatigue, and mood. Treatment response is assessed after 9 and 18 weeks.

Aims:

  1. To explore possible associations between sleep and the clinical response to treatment with ICI.
  2. To investigate the prevalence of sleep disturbance in patients with NSCLC during treatment with ICI.
  3. To prospectively assess changes in sleep parameters over the course of treatment.
  4. To examine associations between sleep parameters and fatigue, depression, anxiety, and inflammation.
  5. To explore possible associations between sleep, fatigue, depression, inflammatory responses and the clinical response to treatment with ICIs.

Hypotheses:

Patients with high levels of sleep disturbance (insomnia severity) will experience 1) poorer clinical response to ICI, 2) more depressive symptoms, 3) higher levels of fatigue, 4) poorer overall health-related quality of life (HRQoL), 5) higher levels of inflammation.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

240

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Robert Zachariae, Prof., DMSc
  • Phone Number: 0045 87165878
  • Email: bzach@aarhus.rm.dk

Study Locations

    • Midtjylland
      • Aarhus, Midtjylland, Denmark, 8200
        • Recruiting
        • Aarhus University Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Louise Stroem, Ph.D-fellow

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Men and women diagnosed with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Confirmed diagnosis of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Insufficient Danish proficiency
  • Pre-existing confounding psychiatric illnesses

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical response to treatment
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to 9 and 18 weeks after treatment initiation, respectively.
Radiological evaluation of the clinical response to treatment with ICI, according to RECIST criteria.
Changes from baseline to 9 and 18 weeks after treatment initiation, respectively.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Insomnia Severity
Time Frame: Weekly from baseline to 18 weeks after treatment initiation, and follow-up 1, 2 and 3 years from baseline, respectively.
Changes in insomnia severity as measured with The Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). Total score ranges from 0 to 28. Interpreted as follows: absence of insomnia (0-7); sub-threshold insomnia (8-14); moderate insomnia (15-21); and severe insomnia (22-28).
Weekly from baseline to 18 weeks after treatment initiation, and follow-up 1, 2 and 3 years from baseline, respectively.
Sleep diary
Time Frame: Baseline, and week 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18, respectively.
Changes in Standard sleep metrics (nightly sleep onset latency (SOL), wakefulness after initial sleep onset (WASO), total sleep time (TST), total time spent in bed (TIB), sleep efficiency (SE).
Baseline, and week 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18, respectively.
Fatigue
Time Frame: Baseline, and week 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18, respectively, and follow-up 1, 2 and 3 years from baseline, respectively.
Changes in subjective fatigue as measured with the Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory - Short Form (MFSI-SF). Subscales (general, physical, emotional, and mental fatigue) are summed and the vigor scale subtracted to create a fatigue total score, with higher scores indicating higher levels of fatigue.
Baseline, and week 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18, respectively, and follow-up 1, 2 and 3 years from baseline, respectively.
Depressive symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline, and week 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18, respectively, and follow-up 1, 2 and 3 years from baseline, respectively.
Changes in depressive symptoms as measured with the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Depression - Short Form 8a. Total raw score ranges from 8 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater severity of depression.
Baseline, and week 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18, respectively, and follow-up 1, 2 and 3 years from baseline, respectively.
Health-related quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline, and week 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18, respectively, and follow-up 1, 2 and 3 years from baseline, respectively.
Changes in health-related quality of life as measured with The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Quality of Life questionnaire for cancer patients (EORTC QLQ-C30). The standardized raw score, ranges from 0 to 100; a higher score represents a higher ("better") level of functioning, or a higher ("worse") level of symptoms.
Baseline, and week 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18, respectively, and follow-up 1, 2 and 3 years from baseline, respectively.
Disease specific health-related quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline, and week 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18, respectively, and follow-up 1, 2 and 3 years from baseline, respectively.
Changes in disease specific health-related quality of life as measured with The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Quality of Life Lung Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-LC29). The standardized raw score, ranges from 0 to 100; a high score for the symptom scales / single items represents a high level of symptomatology or problems.
Baseline, and week 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18, respectively, and follow-up 1, 2 and 3 years from baseline, respectively.
Perceived Stress
Time Frame: Baseline, and week 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18, respectively, and follow-up 1, 2 and 3 years from baseline, respectively.
Changes in perceived stress as measured with The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Total score ranges from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating higher perceived stress.
Baseline, and week 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18, respectively, and follow-up 1, 2 and 3 years from baseline, respectively.
Sickness behavior
Time Frame: Baseline, and week 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18, respectively, and follow-up 1, 2 and 3 years from baseline, respectively.
Changes in subjective sickness behavior as measured with the Sickness Questionnaire (SicknessQ). Total score ranges from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating more sickness behaviour.
Baseline, and week 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18, respectively, and follow-up 1, 2 and 3 years from baseline, respectively.
Cortisol
Time Frame: Baseline, and week 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18, respectively.
Cortisol awakening response (CAR), and the diurnal cortisol slope (DCS)
Baseline, and week 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18, respectively.
Inflammatory response 1
Time Frame: Baseline, and week 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18, respectively.
CRP
Baseline, and week 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18, respectively.
Inflammatory response 2
Time Frame: Baseline, and week 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18, respectively.
IL-6
Baseline, and week 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18, respectively.
Inflammatory response 3
Time Frame: Baseline, and week 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18, respectively.
TNF-a
Baseline, and week 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18, respectively.
Inflammatory response 4
Time Frame: Baseline, and week 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18, respectively.
Se-Cortisol
Baseline, and week 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18, respectively.
Inflammatory response 5
Time Frame: Baseline, and week 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18, respectively.
White blood cell count.
Baseline, and week 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18, respectively.
Actigraphy 1
Time Frame: Baseline to 18 weeks after initiation of treatment.
Objective sleep outcome. Nightly sleep onset latency (SOL)
Baseline to 18 weeks after initiation of treatment.
Actigraphy 2
Time Frame: Baseline to 18 weeks after initiation of treatment.
Objective sleep outcome: Wakefulness after initial sleep onset (WASO)
Baseline to 18 weeks after initiation of treatment.
Actigraphy 3
Time Frame: Baseline to 18 weeks after initiation of treatment.
Objective sleep outcome: Total sleep time (TST)
Baseline to 18 weeks after initiation of treatment.
Actigraphy 4
Time Frame: Baseline to 18 weeks after initiation of treatment.
Objective sleep outcome: Total time spent in bed (TIB)
Baseline to 18 weeks after initiation of treatment.
Actigraphy 5
Time Frame: Baseline to 18 weeks after initiation of treatment.
Objective sleep outcome: Sleep efficiency (SE, i.e., the percent of the time asleep out of amount of time spent in bed)
Baseline to 18 weeks after initiation of treatment.
Actigraphy 6
Time Frame: Baseline to 18 weeks after initiation of treatment.
Objective sleep outcome: Circadian activity rhythms.
Baseline to 18 weeks after initiation of treatment.
Disease status
Time Frame: 1, 2 and 3 years from treatment initiation (baseline).
Changes in disease status after treatment initiation with ICI. Changes are evaluated according to RECIST criteria.
1, 2 and 3 years from treatment initiation (baseline).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Robert Zachariae, Prof., DMSc, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 5, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 23, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

August 28, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 22, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2021

Last Verified

July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Cancer

3
Subscribe