Effectiveness of a Novel Mobile App Based Cardiac Rehabilitation

August 28, 2019 updated by: Eng Chan Neoh, Tan Tock Seng Hospital

Effectiveness of a Novel Mobile App Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Compared to Traditional Centre-based, Therapist Driven Cardiac Rehabilitation for Patients Post Coronary Revascularisation : A Non-inferiority Pilot Study

n Tan Tock Seng (TTSH), Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is one of the top 4 reasons for admissions with 948 percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures done in year 2016. International guidelines recommend that all patients complete CR after PCI, as it plays a critical role in reducing five-year cardiovascular mortality and the risk of cardiovascular-related hospital admission. However, the rate of completion of CR has been found to be low as only 19% of post PCI patients completed CR in 2016. According to a patient survey conducted, the main reason for non-completion is the inconvenience experienced by patients from needing to return to hospital weekly. In addition, poor compliance to prescribed home exercises limits the effectiveness of exercise training. Hence, there is a pertinent need to activate patients to engage in self-directed CR in a safe and effective manner to target these issues. Current solutions to increase participation and compliance involve strategies have been limited. Participation and compliance to prescribed exercises recorded via brochures and activity diaries have been limited by difficulties experienced by patients when providing this information, posing a risk of recall bias or the risk of misplacing their activity logs. Mobile applications targeted at increasing fitness addresses the problem of the risk of misplacing activity logs but is still subjected to recall bias as self-input of multiple data is required. Exercise guidelines within these applications are also generic and does not adhere to international exercise training guidelines targeted at patients after coronary revascularisation. In order to address these gaps, there is a need for a technology enabled solution that can provide evidence-based CR programme with constant HR monitoring which offers direct feedback to the patients and at the same time affordable and easy to use. "Heart-Track" is a novel mobile app based CR model of care that utilises a technology-enabled device designed specifically for patients post PCI to complete CR at their convenience, while ensuring that evidence-based clinical outcomes are achieved.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In Tan Tock Seng (TTSH), Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is one of the top 4 reasons for admissions with 948 percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures done in year 2016. International guidelines recommend that all patients complete CR after PCI, as it plays a critical role in reducing five-year cardiovascular mortality and the risk of cardiovascular-related hospital admission. However, the rate of completion of CR has been found to be low as only 19% of post PCI patients completed CR in 2016. According to a patient survey conducted, the main reason for non-completion is the inconvenience experienced by patients from needing to return to hospital weekly. In addition, poor compliance to prescribed home exercises limits the effectiveness of exercise training. Hence, there is a pertinent need to activate patients to engage in self-directed CR in a safe and effective manner to target these issues. Current solutions to increase participation and compliance involve strategies have been limited. Participation and compliance to prescribed exercises recorded via brochures and activity diaries have been limited by difficulties experienced by patients when providing this information, posing a risk of recall bias or the risk of misplacing their activity logs. Mobile applications targeted at increasing fitness addresses the problem of the risk of misplacing activity logs but is still subjected to recall bias as self-input of multiple data is required. Exercise guidelines within these applications are also generic and does not adhere to international exercise training guidelines targeted at patients after coronary revascularisation. In order to address these gaps, there is a need for a technology enabled solution that can provide evidence-based CR programme with constant HR monitoring which offers direct feedback to the patients and at the same time affordable and easy to use. "Heart-Track" is a novel mobile app based CR model of care that utilises a technology-enabled device designed specifically for patients post PCI to complete CR at their convenience, while ensuring that evidence-based clinical outcomes are achieved. The key components of "Heart-Track" are: 1. Exercise principles based on international guidelines 2. Gamification; 3. Continuous heart rate monitoring; 4. Adaptation to local context. As Heart-track is the first of its kind, being designed for use in the local context, findings from research is important in determining its efficacy when compared to traditional cardiac rehabilitation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

34

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. 21-65 years old
  2. Underwent coronary revascularisation follow AMI
  3. Language literacy English or Mandarin
  4. Owns a smart phone
  5. Normal physiological response during exercise testing
  6. Low or moderate risk following risk stratification.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Medically unfit for exercise
  2. Post op complication
  3. High risk following risk stratification
  4. Cognitive impaired

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Control arm
the control group will undergo a conventional weekly CR programme lasting 8-12 sessions. Components of each session will include warm up, aerobic training, resistance exercises and cool down. Patients are encouraged to continue their home exercises, exercising another 2 times a week at home and record down using an activity diary. The importance of CR programme and exercise advice will be explained and reinforced by the CR Physiotherapist. The submaximal exercise test and a body composition analysis will be repeated on the final assessment. Every week research coordinator will call the subject to remind them to exercise.
conventional weekly CR programme lasting 8-12 sessions.
Other: Intervention arm
During the initial assessment, the importance of CR and regular exercise will be explained and reinforced by CR physiotherapist. A research assistant will teach the patient how to use "Heart Track". The patient will then bring "Heart Track" home to continue their CR program. Patient will then undergo the whole CR programme to exercise for 3 times a day for 8-12 weeks using "Heart Track". Each "Heart Track" session will include warm up, aerobic training, resistance exercises and cool down (same as the traditional CR session). After 8-12 weeks, patient will be called back to the clinic by the research assistant to complete the final assessment (sub-maximal exercise test and a body composition analysis) with the blinded assessor. Every week research coordinator will call the subject to remind them to exercise.
Key components of "Heart-Track" are a heart rate sensor, a mobile app and a remote monitoring portal. The "Heart-Track" mobile app is synchronized/ connected to Polar heart rate sensor through bluetooth in order to provide continous heart rate monitoring when subjects are exercising. This is to ensure safety and exercise effectiveness.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
6 minutes walk test
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
The 6-min walk test (6 MWT) is a submaximal exercise test that entails measurement of distance walked over a span of 6 minutes. The MCID for 6MWD in patients with CAD after ACS was 25m.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Body weight
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Body weight will be assessed , record in kg
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Body Height
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Body height will be assessed, record in meter
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Body Mass Index
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Measure of body fat based on height and weight that applies to adult men and women. Calculated by using body weight and height (kg/m2)
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Body Fat Percentage
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Assess using a bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) method, record in percentage %
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Skeletal muscle mass
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Assess using a bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) method, record in kg
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Waist Hip Ratio
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Assess using a bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) method
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Borg's RPE scale
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Rating of perceived exertion (RPE) is a widely used and reliable indicator to monitor and guide exercise intensity. The scale allows individuals to subjectively rate their level of exertion during exercise or exercise testing. body fat,Skeletal muscle mass, Waist-hip ratio can be measured by using the body composition analysis machine. Borg scale 6-20, 6 is very very light and 20 is very very hard.
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-Efficacy for Exercise Scale•
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
This scale is a self-report of exercise self-efficacy. Total score is calculated by summing the responses to each question. This scale has a range of total scores from 0-90. A higher score indicates higher self-efficacy for exercise.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Health related QoL: MacNew myocardial infarction Quality of life questionnaire
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
  1. The MacNew consists of 27 items which fall into three domains [a 13-item physical limitations domain scale, a 14-item emotional function domain scale, and a 13-item social function domain scale]. There are 5 items that inquire about symptoms: angina/chest pain, shortness of breath, fatigue, dizziness, and aching legs.
  2. Scores are reported using a descriptive scale which are described as: "all of the time", "most of the time", "a good bit of the time", "some of the time", "a little of the time", "hardly any of the time" and "none of the time"
  3. The maximum possible score in any domain is 7 [high HRQL] and the minimum is 1 [poor HRQL]
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Patient-reported survey on usability of Heart Track acceptability
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Participants rated their experience with the hardware and software components of "Heart Track", and their acceptance of it as a cardiac rehabilitation tool. The survey form is a likert-scale ( Strongly agree to strongly disagree) survey that asking subjects about their feedback and satisfaction about the Heart Track hardware and software, and overall experience using Heart Track.
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Eng Chuan Neoh, masters, Senior Physiotherapist

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 31, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 20, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 28, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

August 29, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 29, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 28, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2018/00977

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiac Disease

Clinical Trials on Conventional Cardiac Rehab Classes

3
Subscribe