Digital Preop-planning of Total Hip Arthroplasties (PLANORTHO)

April 15, 2024 updated by: University Hospital, Toulouse

Digital Preop-planning of Total Hip Arthroplasties in Orthopedic

Residual leg length discrepancy is a common issue after total hip arthroplasty(THA). Digital preoperative planning may improve the accuracy of the surgical procedure and may help the surgeon to precisely predict implants sizes

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Total hip arthroplasties (THAs) are used to restore locomotion. More than 150,000 THAs are performed each year in France. Better outcomes require a restoration of limb lengths and anatomy. Post-operative discrepancy is the main cause of complaints and financial compensation in the US after THA. As such, the investigators aim to use preoperative digital planning using TraumaCad to optimize the restoration of the center of rotation of the hips. Preoperative planning are usually performed using anteroposterior standard radiographs, which are scaled to an inaccurate scale. The TraumaCad system (Brainlab®) allows the adjustment of the scales to each patient and the virtual positioning of the implants in order to simulate the intervention for the restitution of the geometrical parameters of the hip.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Toulouse, France, 31000
        • CHU de Toulouse

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • being older than18 years,
  • osteoarthritis as the indication for THA

Exclusion Criteria:

  • THAs after femoral neck fractures,
  • revision surgery,
  • major architectural anomaly (Bone tumor, prior fracture of the pelvis, hip dysplasia),
  • patients under legal protection,
  • pregnancy or breast-feeding

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control group
Control group will be assessed by standard preop planning using implants templates.
The study will be compare pre-op planning with standard condition or with TraumaCad
Active Comparator: TraumaCad Group
TraumaCad Group will be assessed by preop planning using Traumacad
The study will be compare pre-op planning with standard condition or with TraumaCad

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
postoperative residual discrepancy
Time Frame: day 3
The primary endpoint is the postoperative residual discrepancy measured on the radiographs on postop day 3 in millimeter compared using standard planning methods compared to TraumaCad.
day 3

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
comparisons of the reproducibility of the femoral implants sizes
Time Frame: day 3
Secondary endpoints is comparisons of the reproducibility of the femoral implants sizes predicted by the software
day 3
comparison of pelvis parameters
Time Frame: day 3
Secondary endpoints is the comparison of pelvis parameters in the 2 groups (offset, positioning of the implants) postoperatively. The angle of femur axis and the center of rotation of hip will be measure on the radiography of day 3
day 3

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nicolas Reina, MD, CHU de Toulouse, France

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 8, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 15, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

January 15, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 10, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 12, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

September 16, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 16, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 14 7426 15

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Orthopedic Disorder

Clinical Trials on evaluation of pre-op planning using Traumacad

Subscribe