- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04111250
Crestal vs Lateral Sinus Lift Augmentation
Crestal Versus Lateral Sinus Lift: One-year Results From a Within-patient Randomised Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Each patient having bilateral edentulism in posterior maxillae was randomised to receive one partial fixed prosthesis supported by one to three implants placed either with a crestal or with lateral window sinus lift procedure.
Eligibility criteria for participants
Only healed implant sites were considered (at least 3 months after tooth extraction). The vertical bone height at the implant sites to be included had to be between 2 to 6 mm and bone thickness at least 6 mm as measured on cone-bean computed tomography (CBCT) scans.
Patients were not admitted in the study if any of the following exclusion criteria was present:
general contraindications to implant surgery subjected to irradiation in the head and neck area immunosuppressed or immunocompromised treated or under treatment with intravenous amino-bisphosphonates poor oral hygiene and motivation untreated periodontal disease uncontrolled diabetes pregnant or lactating substance abusers psychiatric problems unrealistic expectations lack of opposite occluding dentition/prosthesis in the area intended for implant placement acute or chronic infection/inflammation in the area intended for sinus augmentation/implant placement referred only for implant placement who cannot be rehabilitated and followed at the treatment centre unable to attend a 5-year post-loading follow-up. Smokers were included and patients were categorised into three groups according to what declare: i) non-smokers; ìì) moderate smokers, if smoking up to 10 cigarettes/day; iii) heavy smokers if smoking more than 10 cigarettes/day.
Patients were recruited and treated in one private practice in Tirana, Albania by two operators: Marco Tallarico who performed all surgical interventions and Erta Xhanari who performed all prosthetic and maintenance procedures.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Tirana, Albania
- Aldent University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Partially edentulous patient
- Bilateral edentulism in posterior maxillae (premolars and molars)
- 18 years or older
- Able to understand and sign an informed consent.
- At least 3 months after tooth extraction
- Vertical bone height at the implant sites between 2 to 6 mm
- Bone thickness at least 6 mm as measured on CBCT scan
Exclusion Criteria:
- general contraindications to implant surgery
- subjected to irradiation in the head and neck area
- immunosuppressed or immunocompromised
- treated or under treatment with intravenous amino-bisphosphonates
- poor oral hygiene and motivation
- untreated periodontal disease
- uncontrolled diabetes
- pregnant or lactating
- substance abusers
- psychiatric problems
- unrealistic expectations
- lack of opposite occluding dentition/prosthesis
- acute or chronic infection/inflammation
- augmentation/implant placement
- referred only for implant placement
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: SINGLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: Crestal sinus lift using iRasie implant
Device: iRaise Sinus Lift implant (Maxillent, Herzliya, Israel). Procedure: crestal sinus lift augmentation. We tested crestal versus lateral approach to the sinus. Crestal approach is made by a novel device (iRaise, implant system). Lateral approach is made conventionally with gold standard procedure (lateral approach). The iRaise Sinus Lift implant is made of Titanium-6 Aluminum-4 Vanadium alloy, have a surface treated with grit blasting using an apatitic calcium phosphate media, followed by acid etching, and have an internal hexagon connection. Implants have an internal l-shape channel to allow saline and graft passage. This implants system is made to perform crestal sinus lift procedure at the same time of the implant placement using the same device. After implant site preparation and initial implant placement, the hydraulic system is connected to the implant to allow the injection of saline and then graft the material. Then, the implant, is inserted for its full length. |
Raise the sinus membrane to graft bone substitute to augment the sinus cavity allowing implants placement.
Other Names:
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Lateral sinus lift
Conventional procedure. Lateral approach to the sinus was made following the conventional procedure. A window on the lateral wall of the sinus is performed according to a conventional surgical lateral approach to the sinus cavity. Graft materials is filled inside the sinus cavity. Finally, iSure implants [Maxillent] are placed, and flap is sutured. |
Raise the sinus membrane to graft bone substitute to augment the sinus cavity allowing implants placement.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Prosthesis failure
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
|
Planned prosthesis which could not be placed due to implant failure(s), loss of the prosthesis secondary to implant failure(s) or a prosthesis that had to be remade for any reasons.
|
Up to 5 years
|
Implant failure
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
|
Implant mobility, removal of stable implants dictated by progressive marginal bone loss or infection, and implants fracture or any other mechanical complications rendering the implant unusable.
The stability of each individual implant was measured with the removed prosthesis at abutment connection, at delivery definitive prostheses and at 1 year after loading, by tightening the implant abutment screws with a torque of 20 Ncm or by assessing the stability of individual crowns using the handles of two metallic instruments.
|
Up to 5 years
|
Complications
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
|
Any technical and biological complications
|
Up to 5 years
|
Patient's preference (questionnaire)
Time Frame: Assessed 1 week and 1 month after surgery
|
Answers: 1) the side treated with the crestal technique, 2) the side treated with the lateral technique, 3) none, both treatments were equally good, 4) none, both treatments were equally bad.
|
Assessed 1 week and 1 month after surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Time (minutes)
Time Frame: The time in minutes of the surgical procedure, from the incision of the gingiva to the placement of the last stitch
|
Time needs to perform the procedure, starting from the surgical incision to the delivery of the last suture, including the additional implants.
|
The time in minutes of the surgical procedure, from the incision of the gingiva to the placement of the last stitch
|
Marginal bone loss
Time Frame: 1 year after loading
|
Assessed on digital periapical radiographs taken with the paralleling technique at implant placement, prosthesis delivery and 1 year after loading using a digital apparatus (CS 2100, Carestream Dental, Rochester, NY, US).
In the case of a not properly readable radiograph, the radiograph was to be taken again.
Radiographs were stored in a TIFF format with a 600 dpi resolution, in a personal computer.
Peri-implant marginal bone levels were measured using the DFW 2.8 software for windows (Soredex, Tuusula, Finland).
The software was calibrated for every single image using the known implant diameter.
The distance between marginal bone level and implant/abutment junction, was measured at both mesial and distal sides to the nearest 0.01 mm and averaged.
Bone level changes at single implants was averaged at sinus level and then at group level.
Reference points for the linear measurements were: the coronal margin of the implant collar and the most coronal point of bone-to-implant contact.
|
1 year after loading
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- iRaise_RCT
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Edentulous Alveolar Ridge
-
Mashhad University of Medical SciencesCompletedAtrophy of Edentulous Alveolar Ridge | Alveolar Ridge AugmentationIran, Islamic Republic of
-
Ain Shams UniversityNot yet recruitingEvaluation of Marginal Bone Loss of Two Immediately Loaded Implants Retaining Mandibular OverdentureEdentulous Alveolar RidgeEgypt
-
ARDEC AcademyUniversidad Nacional de TrujilloRecruiting
-
ahmed ashraf abdelreheemRecruiting
-
Paolo PesceCompletedEdentulous Alveolar RidgeItaly
-
University of BaghdadCompletedEdentulous Alveolar RidgeIraq
-
Fundación Eduardo AnituaBTI S.LActive, not recruitingEdentulous Alveolar RidgeSpain
-
Cairo UniversityUnknown
Clinical Trials on Maxillary sinus augmentation
-
ARDEC AcademyCorporacion Universitaria Rafael NunezCompleted
-
ARDEC AcademyCompletedAlveolar Bone Loss | Alveolar Bone ResorptionColombia
-
Aalborg University HospitalActive, not recruitingDental Implant FailedDenmark
-
Camlog Oral Reconstruction FoundationCompleted
-
Aalborg University HospitalCompletedPeri-Implantitis | Patient Satisfaction | Survival, ProsthesisDenmark
-
ARDEC AcademyUniversity of Bologna; ITI International Team for Implantology, SwitzerlandCompleted
-
Kutahya Health Sciences UniversityCompletedMaxillary Sinus Disease | Sinus DiseaseTurkey
-
Universidad de GranadaRecruiting
-
Semmelweis UniversityInstitut Straumann AG; NSK Europe GmbH; Botiss Medical AG; Dicomlab Kft.; Hungarian... and other collaboratorsCompletedMaxillary Sinus AugmentationHungary
-
Western Galilee Hospital-NahariyaUnknown