Activity Coaching in Patients Post Lung Transplantation

February 12, 2024 updated by: Thierry Troosters, KU Leuven

Enhancing Physical Activity in Patients After Lung Transplantation: Effectiveness and Feasibility of a Semi-automated Tele Coaching Program

Lung transplantation is an ultimate, effective treatment option for selected patients with end stage lung disease, improving quality of life and extending survival. Because of the improved survival during the last decades, enhancing the long term condition after lung transplantation has now become a focus for disease management.

The co-presence of non-communicable diseases is common and poses new challenges to disease management. These comorbidities have been related to physical activity in the healthy population. As in other chronic respiratory disease, physical inactivity is a common feature of patients after LTX. Despite near normal lung function, exercise intolerance and physical inactivity persist up to years after the transplantation. Literature on effective interventions to increase physical activity are scarce in this population.

Therefore, the present project aims to test the effectiveness of a tele coaching program to enhance physical activity and to analyze the association between physical activity and long-term health benefits in this population at risk. These research questions will be answered based on a randomized controlled trial. Patients that are active at baseline will be followed up in a cohort study.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The aims of the present study are:

1) primary objective: To test the effectiveness of adding a semi-automated tele coaching intervention to enhance physical activity in patients after a first double lung transplantation, assessed at 12 weeks.

2) Secondary objectives:

  1. To test the long term effect of a semi-automated tele coaching intervention on physical activity, assessed at 52 weeks.
  2. To analyze the association between baseline physical activity, the change in physical activity and long term health benefits in this population at risk
  3. To relate the day-by-day pattern of physical activity to changes in the health status of patients.
  4. To investigate the patient's experience with the delivered intervention.

Therefore, the study will include stable patients at least 6 months and maximum 4 years after a first double lung transplantation. Based on a 1 week physical activity assessment, patients will be classified as active (mean steps >7500 steps) or inactive (mean steps < 7500). Inactive patients will be entered in a randomized controlled trial, using block randomization. Active patients will be followed for 1 year in a cohort study.

The study consists of a total of 3 (active patients) or 4 (inactive patients) clinical visits:

  • Visit 1 screening visit (all patients)
  • Visit 2: randomisation visit, scheduled 1-2 weeks after visit 1 (all patients)
  • Visit 3: short term follow up, scheduled 12 weeks after visit 2. T(only in patients who have been randomized)
  • Visit 4: long term follow up, scheduled 52 weeks after visit 2. (all patients)

Active patients will be measured again 52 weeks after visit 2. They will not receive any intervention during the 1 year follow up. Patients who enter the randomized controlled trial will either receive

  • A mulitcomponent tele coaching intervention that consists of 1) education about the importance of physical activity and a one-to-one interview with the coach discussing motivation and barriers to be active, 2) a step counter providing direct feedback, 3) application installed on a smartphone providing an adaptive goal and daily and weekly feedback and 4) contact with the coach if the patient is not compliant with the intervention, not increasing physical activity or when the patient reports a change in medication. The patient is asked to have a daily interaction with the smartphone application.
  • A sham intervention that consist of 1) education about the importance of physical activity and a personal (fixed) goal expressed in terms of steps. The patient is asked to try to reach this goal, 2) a step counter providing direct feedback, 3) application installed on a smartphone only displaying a graph with the activity of the present week and the personal (fixed) goal, 4) contact with the coach if the patient reports a change in medication. The patient is asked to have at least a weekly interaction with the application.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

108

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Leuven, Belgium, 3000
        • KULeuven

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Stable patients at least 6 months and maximum 4 years after the first double lung transplantation
  2. Older than 30 years
  3. Understand and able to work with the smartphone application, as judged by the investigator

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Having a diagnosis of Cystic Fibrosis
  2. Musculoskeletal problems not allowing a normal gait pattern
  3. Receiving a multi-organ transplantation or previously undergoing a solid-organ or bone marrow transplantation
  4. Chronic rejection of the allograft before inclusion
  5. Having a life expectancy <1year

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Tele coaching group
Coaching with daily interaction with the coaching application, based on an adaptive physical activity goal

A.Education about the importance of PA. During a one-to-one interview with the coach motivation, self-efficacy, barriers, favorite activities and strategies to become more active are discussed.

B. Step counter providing direct feedback.

C.A smartphone with a project-tailored application. The application provides automated coaching by displaying an activity goal (number of steps) and feedback on a daily basis. The feedback comes with a graphical presentation. Patients' targets are automatically revised weekly. The aim is to progressively increase the PA during the 12 weeks period and maintain afterwards.

D.Telephone contacts triggered in the case of non-compliance with wearing the step counter, failure to transmit data or failure to progress. Coaches are alerted by a note at the coaches' backend to take contact with the patient if needed.

Sham Comparator: Sham coaching group
Coaching with fixed physical activity goal and limited interaction with the smartphone application.

A. Education about the importance of PA. During a one-to-one interview with the investigator, patients will receive a personal goal (expressed in steps/day), based on their individual exercise capacity.

B.A step counter providing direct feedback.

C.A smartphone with a project-tailored application. The application receives the step data of the patient and asks on a weekly basis about the patient's change in medication. The application does provide a graph showing the steps the patient took and presents a general activity plan including their personal goal (which stays the same throughout the entire intervention period).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Daily number of steps at 12 weeks (short term effect)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Change in daily mean step count 12 weeks post randomization in the intervention group as compared to the control group. Physical activity will be objectively measured for 1 week using a tri-axial accelerometer validated for use in in chronic respiratory disease. Data obtained on days with more than 8 hours of wearing time will be used for further analysis.
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of responders
Time Frame: 12 weeks and 52 weeks
Proportion of patients showing an increase of at least 1000 steps. Physical activity will be objectively measured for 1 week using a tri-axial accelerometer validated for use in in chronic respiratory disease. Data obtained on days with more than 8 hours of wearing time will be used for further analysis.
12 weeks and 52 weeks
Daily number of steps at 52 weeks (long term effect)
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Change in daily mean step count 52 weeks post randomization in the intervention group as compared to the control group. Physical activity will be objectively measured for 1 week using a tri-axial accelerometer validated for use in in chronic respiratory disease. Data obtained on days with more than 8 hours of wearing time will be used for further analysis.
52 weeks
Exercise capacity
Time Frame: 12 weeks and 52 weeks
Change in six-minutes walk distance 12 and 52 weeks post randomization in the intervention group as compared to the control group. The six-minute walking test will be performed with standardized encouragement to assess patients' functional exercise capacity. The best of two measurements will be used.
12 weeks and 52 weeks
Quadriceps force
Time Frame: 12 weeks and 52 weeks
Change in isometric quadriceps force 12 and 52 weeks post randomization in the intervention group as compared to the control group. The quadriceps isometric strength will be evaluated by a maximal voluntary contraction using the Biodex, a computerized dynamometer. Patients will be seated with a 90° hip and 60° knee flexion. The best of 3 measurements will be taken into analysis as the maximal force capacity of the lower limb.
12 weeks and 52 weeks
Health related quality of life
Time Frame: 12 weeks and 52 weeks
Change in quality of life 12 and 52 weeks post randomization in the intervention group as compared to the control group. Health related quality of life will be measured by the extensively validated generic HRQoL questionnaire, the SF-36. This questionnaire includes two main scores with a physical component and an emotional component scale and eight subscales.
12 weeks and 52 weeks
Symptoms of anxiety and depression
Time Frame: 12 weeks and 52 weeks
Change in symptoms of anxiety and depression 12 and 52 weeks post randomization in the intervention group as compared to the control group. Symptoms of anxiety and depression will be measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADs). The HADs is a generic screening measure of symptoms of anxiety and depression. The HADS is a 14 item measure comprising 7 anxiety items and 7 depression items from which separate anxiety and depression sub-scale scores are calculated.
12 weeks and 52 weeks
Symptoms of fatigue
Time Frame: 12 weeks and 52 weeks
Change in symptoms of fatigue 12 and 52 weeks post randomization in the intervention group as compared to the control group. Fatigue will assessed using the subscale fatigue of the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS). The subscale consists of 8 items. Each item is scored on a 7-point scale. The total score ranging from 8 to 56 is calculated. Significant fatigue is defined as a score of 35 or higher on the CIS fatigue.
12 weeks and 52 weeks
Time spent in at least moderate intense activity
Time Frame: 12 weeks and 52 weeks
Change in daily time spent in at least moderate intense activity 12 and 52 weeks post randomization in the intervention group as compared to the control group. Physical activity will be objectively measured for 1 week using a tri-axial accelerometer validated for use in in chronic respiratory disease. Data obtained on days with more than 8 hours of wearing time will be used for further analysis.
12 weeks and 52 weeks
Mean walking time per day
Time Frame: 12 weeks and 52 weeks
Change in mean daily walking time 12 and 52 weeks post randomization in the intervention group as compared to the control group. Physical activity will be objectively measured for 1 week using a tri-axial accelerometer validated for use in in chronic respiratory disease. Data obtained on days with more than 8 hours of wearing time will be used for further analysis.
12 weeks and 52 weeks
Metabolic syndrome
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Prevalence of abdominal obesity, hyperlipidemia, hypertension and diabetes (and combined in the metabolic syndrome). Abdominal obesity will be assessed by waist and hip circumference, hypertension will be assessed by 2 tests of blood pressure with at least 5 minutes interval, hyperlipidemia and diabetes will be assessed based on a fasted blood sample.
52 weeks
Lipid profile
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Serum lipid profile (total cholesterol, triglyceride, HDL and LDL) based on a fasted blood sample
52 weeks
blood pressure
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Blood pressure will be assessed twice with at least 5 minutes interval
52 weeks
ankle brachial index
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Peripheral vascular disease will be assessed by the ankle brachial index as the ratio between the blood pressure in the arms and the blood pressure in the lower legs.
52 weeks
Body mass index
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Calculated as the ratio between weight and height (squared)
52 weeks
Body composition
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Fat free and fat mass based on DEXA scan
52 weeks
Waist and hip circumference
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks
HOMA IR
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Calculated based on glucose and insuline levels measured during a fasted blood sample
52 weeks
HbA1c
Time Frame: 52 weeks
HbA1c based on fasted blood sample
52 weeks
bone mineral density
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Bone mineral density measured by DEXA scan
52 weeks
Systemic inflammation
Time Frame: 52 weeks
CRP based on a blood sample.
52 weeks
vitamin D level
Time Frame: 52 weeks
vitamin D levels based on a blood sample.
52 weeks
Cardiopulmonary exercise test (only in patients 6-9 months post transplantation)
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Maximal exercise capacity will be assessed by a maximal incremental cycling test (Ergometrics 900, Ergoline, Bitz, Germany). After a 2-min resting period and 3 minutes of unloaded cycling, the patients will start at 20 W and cycle until symptom limitation at an incremental workload of 10 W/min. Oxygen consumption, carbon dioxide output and ventilation will be measured breath by breath (Vmax series, SensorMedics, Anaheim, CA). Heart rate and oxygen saturation will be registered continuously.
52 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Heleen Demeyer, Dr, KU Leuven
  • Principal Investigator: Robin Vos, Prof, KU Leuven
  • Principal Investigator: Daniel Langer, Prof, KU Leuven
  • Principal Investigator: Geert Verleden, Prof, KU Leuven
  • Principal Investigator: Wim Janssens, Prof, KU Leuven
  • Principal Investigator: Thierry Troosters, Prof, KU Leuven

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 6, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 7, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

September 7, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 16, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 9, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

October 10, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 13, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • S62426

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Transplantation

Clinical Trials on Multi-component physical activity tele coaching intervention

3
Subscribe