- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04170127
Photobiomodulation of Orthodontic Mini-implants by a 635nm Diode Laser
November 17, 2019 updated by: Jacek Matys, Wroclaw Medical University
Photobiomodulation of Orthodontic Mini-implants by a 635nm Diode Laser: Primary and Secondary Stability. A Randomized Clinical Split-Mouth Trial.
The study aimed to estimate clinically an influence of 635nm diode laser on the primary and secondary stability of orthodontic mini-implants placed in a maxilla, to assess mini-implants failure rate (mini-implant loss) and to evaluate a pain level after the treatment.
The randomized clinical split-mouth trial included 15 subjects, 30 implants (Dual Top Anchor System, Seoul, Korea) with a diameter 1.4mm and length of 10mm.
Mini-implants were placed in the area of the attached gingiva between the second premolar and first molar teeth 2 mm below the mucogingival junction of both sides of the maxilla in 15 patients.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
15
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Wschowa, Poland
- Private Dental Healtcare
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients with class II malocclusion defect requiring lateral maxillary teeth distillation based on the use of orthodontic mini-implant;
- the patients were treated first time using fixed orthodontic appliance;
- no systemic diseases;
- were not using anti-inflammatory drugs;
Exclusion Criteria:
- had used antibiotics in the previous 24 months;
- smokers;
- had history of radiotherapy,
- taking bisphosphonate medication
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Right side of the maxilla
the right side of the maxilla
|
Irradiation of implants with 635nm laser
|
No Intervention: Left side of the maxilla
left side of the maxilla
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
stability of orthodontic mini-implants
Time Frame: 60 days
|
The mini-implants stability was estimated employing a Periotest device (Medzintechnik Gulden e K, Modautal, Germany).
The Periotest measurement system includes the sound formed from contact between an object and a metallic tapping bar in a handpiece, which is electromagnetically driven and electronically verified.
The Periotest response detection is analyzed through a fast Fourier transform (FFT) algorithm.
Simply put, the Periotest answer to tapping is estimated by an accelerometer and then analyzed.
The signal generated by tapping is then transformed to a value called the Periotest value (PTV), which depends on the damping characteristics of the peri-implant tissue.
[27] The Periotest Test values (PTVs) are based on a numerical scale ranging from -8 to +50, defined by mathematical computation.
The lower Periotest values indicate higher implant stability and thereupon the higher absorption effect of the target objects.
|
60 days
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Pain level
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
Immediately after the mini-implants placement, each patient received a questionnaire for individual pain assessment (the numeric rating scale, NRS-11, grade level 0-10).
The maximum pain level was measured at both sides of the maxilla during the first day after the treatment.
The NRS-11 scale consists of a conscious, subjective assessment of the pain experienced; therefore, it is used in the case of patients over ten years old.
A rating of 0 signifies no pain, 1-3 represents mild pain, 4-6 moderate pain, and 7-10 severe pain.
|
24 hours
|
mini-implants loss
Time Frame: 60 days
|
60 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
February 2, 2019
Primary Completion (Actual)
May 12, 2019
Study Completion (Actual)
August 2, 2019
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
November 14, 2019
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 17, 2019
First Posted (Actual)
November 20, 2019
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
November 20, 2019
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 17, 2019
Last Verified
November 1, 2019
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- WroclawMU6354J
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Malocclusion, Angle Class II
-
AL YousefKing Abdullah International Medical Research CenterUnknownMalocclusion, Angle Class I | Malocclusion; Angle Class II Division 1Saudi Arabia
-
Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences RohtakUnknownAngle Class II, Division 1 MalocclusionIndia
-
State University of New York at BuffaloCompletedDental Malocclusion | Crowding, Tooth | Angle Class II | Angle Class IUnited States
-
mahmoud abdelhameed mohamedCompleted
-
Al-Azhar UniversityCompleted3D Evaluation of Powerscope Appliance in Treatment of Skeletal Class 2 Malocclusion (Powerscope app)Class II Malocclusion, Division 1Egypt
-
Al-Azhar UniversityCompletedClass II Malocclusion, Division 1Egypt
-
Al-Azhar UniversityCompletedBimaxillary Protrusion | Angle Class II, Division 1 | Dental MalocclusionsEgypt
-
Al-Azhar UniversityRecruitingOrthodontic Appliance Complication, Angle Class II Patients, DistalizationEgypt
-
FCI SystemTerminatedMalocclusion, Angle Class II, Division 1France
-
Damascus UniversityCompletedAngle Class IISyrian Arab Republic
Clinical Trials on Irradiation of implants with 635nm laser
-
Wroclaw Medical UniversityCompletedMalocclusion, Angle Class IIPoland
-
Wroclaw Medical UniversityCompletedMalocclusion, Angle Class IIPoland
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedAlzheimer Disease | Cognitive Impairment, MildEgypt
-
Tri-Service General HospitalMinistry of Science and Technology, TaiwanCompleted
-
University of Sao PauloFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloCompletedAcute Pain | PulpitisBrazil
-
Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.RecruitingUnrecognized ConditionTaiwan
-
Taipei Hospital, Ministry of Health and WelfareRecruiting
-
Tri-Service General HospitalRecruiting
-
University of Nove de JulhoNot yet recruiting
-
Tri-Service General HospitalUnknownLow-Level Laser Therapy