Effect of Theta Burst Stimulation on Alcohol Cue Reactivity

The Effect of Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Theta Burst Stimulation on Alcohol Cue Reactivity and Cognitive Control: a Double-blind, Sham Controlled Study of Heavy Alcohol Drinkers With a History of Alcohol Related Injury.

Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) is prevalent, devastating, and difficult to treat. The intransigence of AUD is readily apparent in the Trauma Unit of Wake Forest University Baptist Hospital, wherein 23% of trauma related admissions are associated with alcohol - higher than the national average of 16%. Of these trauma related admissions, over 70% are estimated to have AUD and 41% will be likely be admitted to the trauma unit again within 5 years. While Dr. Veach (Co-Investigator) and her team in the Department of Surgery have demonstrated that a brief counseling intervention on the inpatient trauma unit can decrease morbidity and recidivism, the rates of AUD and relapse to drinking among these individuals remains very high. With a growing knowledge of the neural circuits that contribute to relapse in AUD, there is an emerging interest in developing a novel, neural-circuit specific therapeutic tool to enhance AUD treatment outcomes.

This will be achieved through a double-blind, sham-controlled cohort study in heavy alcohol drinkers with a history of alcohol-related injury. The brain reactivity to alcohol cues (Incentive Salience) and cognitive performance in the presence of an alcoholic beverage cue (Cognitive Control) will be measured immediately before and after participants receive real or sham intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS- a potentiating form of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)) to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC iTBS). The goals of this pilot study are to quantify the acute effect of a single session of real or sham dlPFC iTBS on brain response to alcohol cues (Aim 1) and cognitive flexibility in the presence of an alcohol cue (Aim 2) among risky drinkers (target engagement ).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) is prevalent, devastating, and difficult to treat. The intransigence of AUD is readily apparent in the Trauma Unit of Wake Forest University Baptist Hospital, wherein 23% of trauma related admissions are associated with alcohol - higher than the national average of 16%. Of these trauma related admissions, over 70% are estimated to have AUD and 41% will be likely be admitted to the trauma unit again within 5 years. While Dr. Veach (Co-Investigator) and her team in the Department of Surgery have demonstrated that a brief counseling intervention on the inpatient trauma unit can decrease morbidity and recidivism, the rates of AUD and relapse to drinking among these individuals remains very high. With a growing knowledge of the neural circuits that contribute to relapse in AUD, there is an emerging interest in developing a novel, neural-circuit specific therapeutic tool to enhance AUD treatment outcomes. The long term goal of the multidisciplinary research team (Hanlon & Veach) is to develop an evidence-based brain stimulation treatment which can ultimately be prescribed to individuals that present to the Trauma Unit with AUD - decreasing their drinking and hospital recidivism.

The competing neurobehavioral decision systems (CNDS) theory posits that in addiction, choice results from a regulatory imbalance between two decision-making systems (impulsive and executive). These behavioral systems are functionally linked to two functional connectivity networks which regulate the incentive salience of the alcohol cue (Salience Network) and cognitive flexibility required for a vulnerable individual to shift attention away from the alcohol cue (Central Executive Network). Modulating these competing neural circuits (e.g. either dampening the incentive salience associated with alcohol cues (Strategy 1) or amplifying cognitive control in the presence of a cue (Strategy 2) may render alcohol users less vulnerable to relapse. Over the past 7 years, Dr. Hanlon's human brain stimulation research group has been focused on focused on Strategy 1 - dampening alcohol craving and brain reactivity to alcohol cues among heavy alcohol drinkers at risk for AUD or relapse to alcohol use. These studies led to a formal double-blind sham-controlled clinical trial of medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) in treatment-seeking alcohol users. Unfortunately, however, this approach is associated with more pain at the stimulation site (forehead) which undermines its promise as a tool to be readily scaled to a larger population, and it is not clear that this improves the attentional bias towards alcohol cues among these individuals.

Hence, the goal of this proposal is to evaluate Strategy 2 of the CNDS theory- increasing activity in executive control circuitry- as an innovative approach to dampening alcohol cue-reactivity (Aim 1) and improving cognitive control in the presence of an alcohol cue (Aim 2). This will be achieved through a double-blind, sham-controlled cohort study in heavy alcohol drinkers with a history of alcohol-related injury. The brain reactivity to alcohol cues (Incentive Salience) and cognitive performance in the presence of an alcoholic beverage cue (Cognitive Control) will be measured immediately before and after participants receive real or sham intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS- a potentiating form of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)) to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC iTBS). iTBS is a high-potency form of brain stimulation wherein two minutes of iTBS (600 pulses) leads to an increase in cortical excitability that lasts for approximately 30 minutes. In 2018 dlPFC iTBS was FDA-cleared as a treatment for major depressive disorder (wherein 30 sessions over 6 weeks lead to a sustained decrease in depressive symptoms for 6 months). In 2019, the first 2 manuscripts were published demonstrating that iTBS decreases cue-reactivity to cocaine. The goals of this pilot study are to quantify the acute effect of a single session of real or sham dlPFC iTBS on brain response to alcohol cues (Aim 1) and cognitive flexibility in the presence of an alcohol cue (Aim 2) among risky drinkers ("target engagement").

Aim 1: Evaluate the effect of dlPFC iTBS on alcohol cue-reactivity. The blood-oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal associated with exposure to alcohol cues will be measured before and after sham and real iTBS using a validated, patient-tailored alcohol/non-alcoholic beverage cue task. Hypothesis: cue-evoked functional connectivity in the mPFC, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), amygdala, and ventral striatum will be attenuated after real but not sham iTBS.

Aim 2: Evaluate the effect of dlPFC iTBS on cognitive performance in the presence of an alcohol cue. Following the alcohol cue reactivity task all individuals will perform the well-known alcohol Stroop task (downloaded from the NIH toolbox) on a Tablet PC while a glass of the participant's preferred alcoholic beverage (beer, wine, liquor) is placed within 5 feet of the participant (but out of arms length). This will occur before and after TBS. The participant will not be allowed to consume the drink. Hypothesis: Stroop accuracy and reaction time will be impaired at baseline, but this difference will be attenuated by real (but not sham) iTBS to the dlPFC (three way mixed model ANOVA, correcting for multiple comparisons).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

11

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • Wake Forest Baptist Health Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Ages 21-65.
  2. Alcohol use disorder identification test score >7
  3. Drink at least 20 standard sized alcohol beverage servings per week

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Current use of prescription or illicit psychoactive drugs (except marijuana or nicotine) known to decrease seizure threshold by self-report in the last 30 days.
  2. Currently meets DSM-V criteria for substance use disorder for a substance other than alcohol, marijuana, or nicotine.
  3. Has current suicidal or homicidal ideation.
  4. Current breath alcohol concentration >0.002
  5. Not currently at risk for withdrawal, as indicated by CIWA-Ar >5.
  6. History of seizures or seizure disorder(s).
  7. Females of childbearing potential who are pregnant (by urine HCG), planning to become pregnant, nursing, or who are not using a reliable form of birth control.
  8. Any other violation of MRI/TMS safety measures.
  9. Unable to read and understand questionnaires, assessments, and the informed consent.
  10. No presence of metal objects in the head/neck.
  11. History of traumatic brain injury resulting in hospitalization, loss of consciousness for more than 10 minutes, and/or having ever been informed he/she has an epidural, subdural, or subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Real TBS to the dlPFC
One session of real intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (TBS) will be delivered to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC)
This will be delivered with the Magventure Magpro system; 600 pulses with the active sham coil (double blinded using the USB key).
Sham Comparator: Sham TBS to the dlPFC
One session of sham Theta Burst Stimulation (TBS) will be delivered to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC)
This will be delivered with the Magventure Magpro system; 600 pulses with the active sham coil (double blinded using the USB key).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Behavioral Outcomes: Change in the k-Value, a Measure of Delay Discounting of Alcohol
Time Frame: Baseline to 1 hour after the intervention
This outcome measure rates the change in k-value, or the delay discounting value of alcohol compared at baseline vs 1 hour after the intervention. Delay discounting is the tendency to place less value on rewards that are delayed in time. K typically falls between 0.0 and 0.5, with smaller values indicating a lack of discounting and a preference for delayed rewards, and higher values indicating stronger discounting and a preference for immediate rewards.
Baseline to 1 hour after the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Colleen Hanlon, PhD, Wake Forest University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 26, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 16, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

April 16, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 7, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

January 10, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 19, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

No individual participant data will be shared. All data is de-identified.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alcohol Drinking

Clinical Trials on Real iTBS to the dlPFC

3
Subscribe