Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Performance of the enVista® One-Piece Hydrophobic Acrylic Trifocal Intraocular Lens in Subjects Undergoing Cataract Extraction

March 22, 2024 updated by: Bausch & Lomb Incorporated

A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Masked, Controlled Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Performance of the enVista® One-Piece Hydrophobic Acrylic Trifocal Intraocular Lens in Subjects Undergoing Cataract Extraction

The objective of the study is to evaluate the safety and performance of the enVista trifocal intraocular lens when implanted in the capsular bag.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

165

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada
        • Bausch Site 106
    • Ontario
      • Concord, Ontario, Canada, L4K 2Z5
        • Bausch Site 102
      • Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, L6H 0J8
        • Bausch Site 103
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada
        • Bausch Site 105
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada
        • Bausch Site 107
      • Vaughan, Ontario, Canada
        • Bausch Site 108
    • Quebec
      • Boisbriand, Quebec, Canada, J7H 0E8
        • Bausch Site 101
      • Longueuil, Quebec, Canada
        • Bausch Site 113
      • Montréal, Quebec, Canada
        • Bausch Site 104

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects must be 18 years of age or older on the date the Informed Consent Form (ICF) is signed.
  • Subjects must have the capability to understand and provide written informed consent on the Institutional Review Board (IRB)/Independent Ethics Committee (IEC) approved Informed Consent Form (ICF) and authorization as appropriate for local privacy regulations.
  • Subjects must have a Best-corrected Distance Visual Acuity (CDVA) equal to or worse than 20/40 in at least one eye, with or without a glare source, due to a clinically significant cataract (cortical, nuclear, subcapsular, or combination) that is considered amenable to treatment with standard phacoemulsification cataract extraction and capsular IOL implantation.
  • Subjects must have a Best-corrected Distance Visual Acuity (CDVA) projected to be equal to or better than 20/32 after IOL implantation in each eye, as determined by the medical judgment of the Investigator or measured by potential acuity meter (PAM) testing, if necessary.
  • Subjects must have clear intraocular media other than the cataract in both eyes.
  • Subjects must have discontinued use of contact lenses for at least 2 weeks (for hard lenses) or 3 days (for soft lenses) prior to the pre-operative examination and must be willing to refrain from use of contact lenses throughout the clinical study.
  • Contact lens wearers must demonstrate a stable refraction (within ±0.50 D for both sphere and cylinder) in both eyes, as determined by distance manifest refraction on two consecutive examination dates after discontinuation of contact lens wear.
  • Subjects must require an IOL power from +16.0 diopter (D) to +27.0 D in both eyes.
  • Subjects must be willing and able to comply with all treatment and follow-up study visits and procedures, and to undergo second eye surgery within 7-30 days of the first eye surgery.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who have participated in an investigational drug or device clinical investigation within 30 days prior to entry into this study and/or will participate in another investigation during the period of study participation.
  • Subjects who have any corneal pathology (e.g., significant scarring, guttata, inflammation, edema, dystrophy, etc.) in either eye. . '
  • Subjects who have significant anterior segment pathology that might increase intraoperative risk or compromise IOL stability (e.g., pseudoexfoliation syndrome, synechiae, iris atrophy, traumatic cataract, lens subluxation, traumatic zonulolysis, zonular dialysis, evident zonular weakness or dehiscence, hypermature or brunescent cataract, etc.) in either eye.
  • Subjects who have uncontrolled glaucoma in either eye.
  • Subjects who have previous retinal detachment or clinically significant retinal pathology involving the macula in either eye.
  • Subjects who have proliferative or non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy in either eye.
  • Subjects who have a congenital ocular anomaly (e.g., aniridia, congenital cataract) in either eye.
  • Subjects with instability of keratometry or biometry measurements.
  • Subjects using any systemic or topical drug known to interfere with visual performance, pupil dilation, or iris structure within 30 days of enrollment or during the study.
  • Subjects who have current or previous usage of an alpha-I-selective adrenoceptor blocking agent or an antagonist of alpha IA adrenoceptor (e.g., Flomax® (tamsulosin HCI), Terazosin, or Cardura).
  • Subjects who have a history of chronic or recurrent inflammatory eye disease (e.g., iritis, scleritis, iridocyclitis, or rubeosis iridis) in either eye.
  • Subjects who have a visual disorder, other than cataracts, that could potentially cause future acuity losses to a level of 20/ I 00 or worse in either eye.
  • Subjects who have had previous intraocular or corneal surgery in either eye, with the exception of laser trabeculoplasty.
  • Subjects with any preoperative infectious conjunctivitis, keratitis, or uveitis in either eye.
  • Subjects who have a preoperative corneal astigmatism> 1.0 D in either eye as measured by corneal topography, irregular astigmatism, or skewed radial axis (note: corneal incisions intended specifically to reduce astigmatism are not allowed during the study).
  • Subjects who cannot achieve a minimum pharmacologic pupil dilation of 5.0 mm in both eyes.
  • Subjects who may be expected to require a combined or other secondary surgical procedure in either eye.
  • Females of childbearing potential (those who are not surgically sterilized or at least 12 months postmenopausal) are excluded from enrollment in the study if they are nursing, lactating, currently pregnant or plan to become pregnant during the study. Females of childbearing potential must be willing to practice effective contraception for the duration of the study.
  • Subjects with any other serious ocular pathology or underlying systemic medical condition (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes) or circumstance that, based on the Investigator's judgment, poses a concern for the subjects' safety or could confound the results of the study.
  • Subjects with abnormal pupillary dilation dynamics (as determined by the medical judgment of the investigator) or eccentric or ectopic pupils in either eye.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: enVista MX60EFH trifocal intraocular lens (IOL)
enVista MX60EFH trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) implanted bilaterally
Active Comparator: enVista MX60E monofocal intraocular lens (IOL)
enVista MX60E monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) implanted bilaterally

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Serious Adverse Events
Time Frame: Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation
All serious adverse events through Post-Operative Visit 4 (Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation)
Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation
Cumulative Rate of Secondary Surgical Interventions Due to the Optical Properties of the Lens
Time Frame: Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation
The cumulative rate of secondary surgical interventions (SSI) due to the optical properties of the lens, through Post-Operative Visit 4 (Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation). The rate was determined as the number of eyes with an SSI related to the optical properties of the IOL divided by the total number of eyes.
Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation
Photopic Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UDVA) for First Implanted Eyes
Time Frame: Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation
Photopic uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) for first implanted eyes at 4 m at Post.Operative Visit 4 (Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation)
Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation
Photopic Uncorrected Near and Intermediate Visual Acuity (UNVA and UIVA) for First Implanted Eyes at 40 cm and 66 cm, Respectively
Time Frame: Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation
Photopic uncorrected near and intermediate visual acuity (UNVA and UIVA) for first implanted eyes at 40 cm and 66 cm, respectively, at Post-Operative Visit 4 (Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation)
Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation
The Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs), Through Postoperative Visit 4 (Day 120 to Day 180 After Second Eye IOL Implantation), Compared to ISO Safety and Performance Endpoint Rates.
Time Frame: Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation
The incidence of adverse events (AEs), through Postoperative Visit 4 (Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation), compared to ISO Safety and Performance Endpoint rates as defined in ISO 11979-7:2018 and EN ISO 11979-7:2018 Annex E. The observed AE rate was calculated as 100 multiplied by the number of eyes with the specific treatment-emergent event divided by the number of implanted eyes.
Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Severe Visual Disturbance
Time Frame: Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation
The incidence of Patient-Reported Outcomes Set subjects experiencing at least one severe visual disturbance, defined as the highest grade of severity or bothersomeness (separately) reported by subjects using the Quality of Vision (QoV) questionnaire at Post-Operative Visit 4 (Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation). Incidence was calculated as 100 multiplied by Count of Participants experiencing at least one severe visual disturbance divided by Number of Participants Analyzed.
Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation
Photopic Contrast Sensitivity With Glare at Post-Operative Visit 4
Time Frame: Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation

Photopic contrast sensitivity with glare at Post-Operative Visit 4 (Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation).

Binocular photopic (approximately 85 cd/m2) contrast sensitivity with glare was tested at spatial frequencies of 3, 6, 12 and 18 cycles per degree (cpd) and was assessed in log units.

Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation
Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity With Glare at Post-Operative Visit 4
Time Frame: Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation
Mesopic contrast sensitivity with glare at Post-Operative Visit 4 (Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation). Binocular mesopic (2.5 to 3.2 cd/m2) contrast sensitivity with glare was tested at spatial frequencies of 1.5, 3, 6 and 12 cpd and was assessed in log units.
Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation
Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare at Post-Operative Visit 4
Time Frame: Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation
Mesopic contrast sensitivity without glare at Post-Operative Visit 4 (Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation). Binocular mesopic (2.5 to 3.2 cd/m2) contrast sensitivity without glare was tested at spatial frequencies of 1.5, 3, 6 and 12 cpd and was assessed in log units.
Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation
IOL Rotation for All Eyes at Post-Operative Visit 4
Time Frame: Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation
IOL rotation for all eyes at Post-Operative Visit 4 (Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation)
Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation
Change From Baseline ( Preoperative ) in Uncorrected Photopic Near and Intermediate Visual Acuity (UNVA and UIVA) at 40 cm and 66 cm, Respectively, for First Implanted Eyes to Post-Operative Visit 4
Time Frame: Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation
Change from baseline ( preoperative ) in uncorrected photopic near and intermediate visual acuity (UNVA and UIVA) at 40 cm and 66 cm, respectively, for first implanted eyes to Post-Operative Visit 4 (Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation)
Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Anya Loncaric, Bausch & Lomb Incorporated

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 10, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 14, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

June 14, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 8, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

January 13, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 22, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 900

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cataract

Clinical Trials on enVista MX60EFH trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs)

3
Subscribe