- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04253717
Motor Control Exercise Program for Pregnant Women With a History of Lumbopelvic Pain
May 8, 2023 updated by: Martin Descarreaux, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Effects of a Motor Control Exercise Program on Lumbopelvic Pain Occurrence and Intensity in Pregnant Women With a History of Lumbopelvic Pain: a Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial.
This study protocol was designed to establish the feasibility of conducting a motor control exercise program with pregnant women presenting a history of lumbopelvic pain (LBPP) in order to reduce LBPP occurrence or limit its intensity.
This randomized controlled trial also aims to preliminary assess the effectiveness of the program.
To do so, 40 pregnant women with a history of LBPP will be recruited and randomly allocated to one of 2 groups: control (20 participants) or intervention (20 participants).
The control group will receive standard care, including basic information on what to do when suffering from LBPP.
The intervention group will participate in a weekly 40-minute group session and two more 40-minute weekly home exercise sessions.
The motor control exercise program will be designed to target strengthening of the lumbo-pelvic-hip core muscles in order to improve stabilization and protection of the spine and pelvis.
Participants of this group will also receive standard care.
Adequate prevention and treatment of LBPP, experienced by women during pregnancy, should help reduce LBPP occurrence or limit its intensity during pregnancy.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
32
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Quebec
-
Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada, G8Z 4M3
- Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 40 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Being pregnant of one fetus
- Being ≤ 20 weeks pregnant
- Presenting a history of lumbopelvic pain
Exclusion Criteria:
- Inflammatory rheumatic disease
- Infectious disease
- Neuromuscular disease
- Vascular disease
- Connective tissue disease
- Severe disabling pain
- Neurologic signs and symptoms
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Motor control exercise program
Participants will be physically trained during pregnancy and will receive the standard care including basic information on what to do when suffering from lumbopelvic pain.
|
Structure physical training aimed at strengthening muscles of the lumbo-pelvic-hip core complex in order to improve stabilization and alignment of the spine and pelvis.
|
No Intervention: Control
Participants will receive the standard care including basic information on what to do when suffering from lumbopelvic pain.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Recruitment rate
Time Frame: Baseline (Pre-intervention)
|
Defined as the ability to recruit 40 eligible women, willing to participate to the study
|
Baseline (Pre-intervention)
|
Retention rate
Time Frame: Baseline (Post-intervention)
|
Defined as the completion of follow-up questionnaire by ≥ 80% of women
|
Baseline (Post-intervention)
|
Adherence rate
Time Frame: Baseline (Post-intervention)
|
Defined as attendance to ≥75% of group sessions and ≥ 75% completion of home sessions
|
Baseline (Post-intervention)
|
Safety of the intervention
Time Frame: 16 weeks follow-up
|
Determined based on the number of adverse events and defined as nature of adverse events
|
16 weeks follow-up
|
Safety of the intervention
Time Frame: Week 16 (Post-intervention)
|
Determined based on the number of adverse events and defined as nature of adverse events
|
Week 16 (Post-intervention)
|
Acceptability of the intervention
Time Frame: 16 weeks follow-up
|
Determined based on how the intervention is perceived by pregnant women (assessed using a 5-point Likert scale : higher score mean a better outcome)
|
16 weeks follow-up
|
Acceptability of the intervention
Time Frame: Week 16 (Post-intervention)
|
Determined based on how the intervention is perceived by pregnant women (assessed using a 5-point Likert scale : higher score mean a better outcome)
|
Week 16 (Post-intervention)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Functional disability
Time Frame: Baseline (Pre-intervention) and week 16 (Post-intervention)
|
Assessed using the Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire (PGQ) (score range from 0 (minimum) to 75 (maximum) : higher score mean a worst outcome)
|
Baseline (Pre-intervention) and week 16 (Post-intervention)
|
Fear avoidance behaviors
Time Frame: Baseline (Pre-intervention) and week 16 (Post-intervention)
|
Assessed using the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) (score range from 17 (minimum) to 68 (maximum) : higher score mean a worst outcome)
|
Baseline (Pre-intervention) and week 16 (Post-intervention)
|
Level of anxiety
Time Frame: Baseline (Pre-intervention) and week 16 (Post-intervention)
|
Assessed using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) (score range from 20 (minimum) to 80 (maximum) : higher score mean a worst outcome)
|
Baseline (Pre-intervention) and week 16 (Post-intervention)
|
Depression
Time Frame: Baseline (Pre-intervention) and week 16 (Post-intervention)
|
Assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) (score range from 0 (minimum) to 63 (maximum) : higher score mean a worst outcome)
|
Baseline (Pre-intervention) and week 16 (Post-intervention)
|
Physical activity levels
Time Frame: Baseline (Pre-intervention) and week 16 (Post-intervention)
|
Assessed using the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ) (weekly energy expenditure (MET-h·week-1), score range from 0 (minimum) to 1631 (maximum) : higher score mean a more active person)
|
Baseline (Pre-intervention) and week 16 (Post-intervention)
|
Lumbopelvic pain (incidence and frequency)
Time Frame: Baseline (Pre-intervention)
|
Defined as a weekly self-reported incidence and frequency of lumbopelvic pain (determined based on the number of episode)
|
Baseline (Pre-intervention)
|
Lumbopelvic pain (incidence and frequency)
Time Frame: 16 weeks follow-up
|
Defined as a weekly self-reported incidence and frequency of lumbopelvic pain (determined based on the number of episode)
|
16 weeks follow-up
|
Lumbopelvic pain (incidence and frequency)
Time Frame: Week 16 (Post-intervention)
|
Defined as a weekly self-reported incidence and frequency of lumbopelvic pain (determined based on the number of episode)
|
Week 16 (Post-intervention)
|
Lumbopelvic pain (intensity)
Time Frame: Baseline (Pre-intervention)
|
Defined as a weekly self-reported intensity of lumbopelvic pain using a 100 millimeters visual analog scale
|
Baseline (Pre-intervention)
|
Lumbopelvic pain (intensity)
Time Frame: 16 weeks follow-up
|
Defined as a weekly self-reported intensity of lumbopelvic pain using a 100 millimeters visual analog scale
|
16 weeks follow-up
|
Lumbopelvic pain (intensity)
Time Frame: Week 16 (Post-intervention)
|
Defined as a weekly self-reported intensity of lumbopelvic pain using a 100 millimeters visual analog scale
|
Week 16 (Post-intervention)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Study Director: Martin Descarreaux, DC, PhD, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
April 2, 2021
Primary Completion (Actual)
December 14, 2022
Study Completion (Actual)
December 14, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
January 28, 2020
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 30, 2020
First Posted (Actual)
February 5, 2020
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
May 9, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 8, 2023
Last Verified
May 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- UQTR-2019-LBPP-Intervention
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Lumbopelvic Pain
-
Muğla Sıtkı Koçman UniversityZeynep Kamil Women's and Children's Diseases Training and Research HospitalCompleted
-
Universidad Europea de MadridCompletedLumbopelvic Postpartum Pain
-
Shalamar Institute of Health SciencesRecruitingPost Partum Lumbopelvic PainPakistan
-
Zahedan University of Medical SciencesCompletedPostpartum Lumbopelvic PainIran, Islamic Republic of
-
University of VirginiaNational Athletic Trainers' Association Research & Education Foundation (NATA...TerminatedKnee Pain | Lumbopelvic Pain | Hip Pain | Ankle PainUnited States
-
Uskudar UniversityCompletedInvestigate the Relationship Between the Psychosocial Factors Affecting Pain Perception and Physical Activity Levels in Pregnant Women With Lumbopelvic PainTurkey
-
University Hospital Schleswig-HolsteinZealand University Hospital; European Regional Development Fund; Design School...CompletedPain, Acute | Pain, Chronic | Pain Measurement | Pain, CancerGermany
-
Flowonix MedicalApproved for marketingBack Pain | Leg Pain | Trunk Pain | Intractable Pain | Arm Pain
-
Dr. Negrin University HospitalCompletedPostoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, ChronicSpain
-
George Washington UniversityRecruitingCervical Fusion | Pain, Back | Pain, Neck | Myofacial PainUnited States
Clinical Trials on Motor control exercise program
-
Universidad Rey Juan CarlosRecruiting
-
Riphah International UniversityCompletedPostural ControlPakistan
-
National Yang Ming UniversityNot yet recruitingShoulder Impingement SyndromeTaiwan
-
Luleå Tekniska UniversitetUmeå University; County Council of Norrbotten, Sweden; NorrlandsklinikenCompleted
-
Pamukkale UniversityRecruitingRotator Cuff TearsTurkey
-
National and Kapodistrian University of AthensCompleted
-
Universidad Rey Juan CarlosCompleted
-
University of MelbourneNational Health and Medical Research Council, AustraliaCompletedKnee Pain | Patellofemoral PainAustralia
-
Hochschule OsnabruckRecruitingNeck Pain | Temporomandibular DisorderGermany
-
Eleni KapreliCompletedMusculoskeletal Abnormalities | Deformity