Motor Control Exercise Program for Pregnant Women With a History of Lumbopelvic Pain

May 8, 2023 updated by: Martin Descarreaux, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières

Effects of a Motor Control Exercise Program on Lumbopelvic Pain Occurrence and Intensity in Pregnant Women With a History of Lumbopelvic Pain: a Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial.

This study protocol was designed to establish the feasibility of conducting a motor control exercise program with pregnant women presenting a history of lumbopelvic pain (LBPP) in order to reduce LBPP occurrence or limit its intensity. This randomized controlled trial also aims to preliminary assess the effectiveness of the program. To do so, 40 pregnant women with a history of LBPP will be recruited and randomly allocated to one of 2 groups: control (20 participants) or intervention (20 participants). The control group will receive standard care, including basic information on what to do when suffering from LBPP. The intervention group will participate in a weekly 40-minute group session and two more 40-minute weekly home exercise sessions. The motor control exercise program will be designed to target strengthening of the lumbo-pelvic-hip core muscles in order to improve stabilization and protection of the spine and pelvis. Participants of this group will also receive standard care. Adequate prevention and treatment of LBPP, experienced by women during pregnancy, should help reduce LBPP occurrence or limit its intensity during pregnancy.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada, G8Z 4M3
        • Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being pregnant of one fetus
  • Being ≤ 20 weeks pregnant
  • Presenting a history of lumbopelvic pain

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inflammatory rheumatic disease
  • Infectious disease
  • Neuromuscular disease
  • Vascular disease
  • Connective tissue disease
  • Severe disabling pain
  • Neurologic signs and symptoms

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Motor control exercise program
Participants will be physically trained during pregnancy and will receive the standard care including basic information on what to do when suffering from lumbopelvic pain.
Structure physical training aimed at strengthening muscles of the lumbo-pelvic-hip core complex in order to improve stabilization and alignment of the spine and pelvis.
No Intervention: Control
Participants will receive the standard care including basic information on what to do when suffering from lumbopelvic pain.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recruitment rate
Time Frame: Baseline (Pre-intervention)
Defined as the ability to recruit 40 eligible women, willing to participate to the study
Baseline (Pre-intervention)
Retention rate
Time Frame: Baseline (Post-intervention)
Defined as the completion of follow-up questionnaire by ≥ 80% of women
Baseline (Post-intervention)
Adherence rate
Time Frame: Baseline (Post-intervention)
Defined as attendance to ≥75% of group sessions and ≥ 75% completion of home sessions
Baseline (Post-intervention)
Safety of the intervention
Time Frame: 16 weeks follow-up
Determined based on the number of adverse events and defined as nature of adverse events
16 weeks follow-up
Safety of the intervention
Time Frame: Week 16 (Post-intervention)
Determined based on the number of adverse events and defined as nature of adverse events
Week 16 (Post-intervention)
Acceptability of the intervention
Time Frame: 16 weeks follow-up
Determined based on how the intervention is perceived by pregnant women (assessed using a 5-point Likert scale : higher score mean a better outcome)
16 weeks follow-up
Acceptability of the intervention
Time Frame: Week 16 (Post-intervention)
Determined based on how the intervention is perceived by pregnant women (assessed using a 5-point Likert scale : higher score mean a better outcome)
Week 16 (Post-intervention)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional disability
Time Frame: Baseline (Pre-intervention) and week 16 (Post-intervention)
Assessed using the Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire (PGQ) (score range from 0 (minimum) to 75 (maximum) : higher score mean a worst outcome)
Baseline (Pre-intervention) and week 16 (Post-intervention)
Fear avoidance behaviors
Time Frame: Baseline (Pre-intervention) and week 16 (Post-intervention)
Assessed using the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) (score range from 17 (minimum) to 68 (maximum) : higher score mean a worst outcome)
Baseline (Pre-intervention) and week 16 (Post-intervention)
Level of anxiety
Time Frame: Baseline (Pre-intervention) and week 16 (Post-intervention)
Assessed using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) (score range from 20 (minimum) to 80 (maximum) : higher score mean a worst outcome)
Baseline (Pre-intervention) and week 16 (Post-intervention)
Depression
Time Frame: Baseline (Pre-intervention) and week 16 (Post-intervention)
Assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) (score range from 0 (minimum) to 63 (maximum) : higher score mean a worst outcome)
Baseline (Pre-intervention) and week 16 (Post-intervention)
Physical activity levels
Time Frame: Baseline (Pre-intervention) and week 16 (Post-intervention)
Assessed using the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ) (weekly energy expenditure (MET-h·week-1), score range from 0 (minimum) to 1631 (maximum) : higher score mean a more active person)
Baseline (Pre-intervention) and week 16 (Post-intervention)
Lumbopelvic pain (incidence and frequency)
Time Frame: Baseline (Pre-intervention)
Defined as a weekly self-reported incidence and frequency of lumbopelvic pain (determined based on the number of episode)
Baseline (Pre-intervention)
Lumbopelvic pain (incidence and frequency)
Time Frame: 16 weeks follow-up
Defined as a weekly self-reported incidence and frequency of lumbopelvic pain (determined based on the number of episode)
16 weeks follow-up
Lumbopelvic pain (incidence and frequency)
Time Frame: Week 16 (Post-intervention)
Defined as a weekly self-reported incidence and frequency of lumbopelvic pain (determined based on the number of episode)
Week 16 (Post-intervention)
Lumbopelvic pain (intensity)
Time Frame: Baseline (Pre-intervention)
Defined as a weekly self-reported intensity of lumbopelvic pain using a 100 millimeters visual analog scale
Baseline (Pre-intervention)
Lumbopelvic pain (intensity)
Time Frame: 16 weeks follow-up
Defined as a weekly self-reported intensity of lumbopelvic pain using a 100 millimeters visual analog scale
16 weeks follow-up
Lumbopelvic pain (intensity)
Time Frame: Week 16 (Post-intervention)
Defined as a weekly self-reported intensity of lumbopelvic pain using a 100 millimeters visual analog scale
Week 16 (Post-intervention)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Martin Descarreaux, DC, PhD, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 2, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 14, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

December 14, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 28, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 9, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • UQTR-2019-LBPP-Intervention

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lumbopelvic Pain

Clinical Trials on Motor control exercise program

3
Subscribe