Turkish Version of Nijmegen Questionnaire

May 22, 2021 updated by: Aslihan CAKMAK, Hacettepe University

The Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Nijmegen Questionnaire in Evaluating Respiratory Dysfunction in Asthmatic Patients

The study aims to provide Turkish version of Nijmegen Questionnaire for the evaluation of respiratory dysfunction in asthmatic subjects. The incidence of hyperventilation syndrome in asthmatic patients can be determined with the results of the study.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Nijmegen Questionnaire allows to assess and identify respiratory symptoms and dysfunction, and to assess unexplained respiratory symptoms and symptoms of hyperventilation syndrome. Determining whether Turkish version of Nijmegen Questionnaire is a valid and reliable tool in asthmatic individuals will guide researchers for further studies on identifying appropriate treatment approaches for the patient and developing different treatment strategies. Hyperventilation syndrome is a recognized form of respiratory dysfunction associated with biochemical factors. Hyperventilation syndrome is defined as breathing above the body's metabolic requirements. This results in decreased carbon dioxide pressure in the arterial blood, respiratory alkalosis, and increased symptoms. Complex symptoms such as shortness of breath, chest tightness, paresthesia, anxiety, and dizziness may occur. There is no laboratory test which is the gold standard in the diagnosis of hyperventilation syndrome. If it is concluded that the Turkish version of the Nijmegen Questionnaire is a valid and reliable test in individuals with asthma, a new tool will be introduced to the literature for the evaluation of pulmonary dysfunction in asthmatic individuals.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

54

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ankara, Turkey, 06100
        • Aslihan Cakmak

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Asthmatic patients

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Having mild to moderate clinically stable asthmatic patients
  • Being able to cooperate
  • Being 18 years old or older

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having severe orthopedic, neurological, cardiovascular disorders or cognitive problems
  • Unable to cooperte

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dyspnea perception
Time Frame: 1st day
Dyspnea will be evaluated with a modified Borg scale. The modified Borg scale is a category scale that evaluates dyspnea between the scores of 0-10. Patients will be asked to mark the appropriate value on the scale.
1st day
Breathe-holding time
Time Frame: 1st day
Individuals are asked to hold their breaths in the sitting position by closing their nostrils and in functional residual volume (after a normal exhalation). In order to eliminate the learning effect, the measurement is repeated three times and the averages of the times are recorded in seconds.
1st day
End-tidal CO2 measurement
Time Frame: 1st day
A portable capnograph with a nasal cannula will be used for the measurement of mean ETCO2 and resting respiration rate over a ten-minute period. Individuals will be asked to breathe through the nose and not speak during the measurement.
1st day
Asthma control test
Time Frame: 1st day
Test is used to evaluate asthma control. The questionnaire consists of five items. The total test score ranges from 5 (weak control) to 25 (fully controlled) (14). A total score of <20 indicates uncontrollable asthma.
1st day
Nijmegen Questionnaire
Time Frame: 1st day
The Nijmegen Questionnaire has been validated as a screening tool for the detection of hyperventilation syndrome (HVS), consisting 16 items. A score of over 23 out of 64 suggests a positive diagnosis of HVS. It has also been used to detect dysfunctional breathing in patients with asthma.
1st day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of life questionnaire
Time Frame: 1st day
The overall quality of life will be determined by the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP). The NHP consists of 38 substances that the individual can complete without the need for a person. The questionnaire has six sub scales: energy (3 items), pain (8 items), emotional reactions (9 items), sleep (5 items), social isolation (5 items) and physical mobility (8 items). For each subsection there is a possible range of points ranging from 0-100 points. Higher scores indicate more limitations in quality of life.
1st day
Disease-specific quality of life
Time Frame: 1st day
Disease-specific quality of life will be determined by the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ). The Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire was found to be valid and reliable in Turkish. The quality of life questionnaire in individuals with asthma is a 32-item disease-specific questionnaire in four health domains, including activity limitation (11 items), symptoms (12 items), emotional function (5 items), and environmental stimuli (4 items). Scores range 1-7, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
1st day
Assessment of anxiety and depression
Time Frame: 1st day
The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) measures physical, emotional, cognitive, and motivational symptoms of depression. The aim of the scale is to determine the level of depression symptoms and the change in severity. BDI is a scale that includes 21 self-assessment sentences and there are four options in each symptom category. Each item is scored between 0-3 points and the total score varies between 0 and 63. The validity and reliability study of the scale was conducted in Turkish. The cut-off value of the Turkish form was determined to be 17.
1st day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Deniz Inal-Ince, Prof, Hacettepe University
  • Principal Investigator: Gul Karakaya, Prof, Hacettepe University
  • Principal Investigator: Aslihan Cakmak, MSc, Hacettepe University
  • Principal Investigator: Senem Simsek, MSc, Hacettepe University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 15, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 21, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

February 21, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 15, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 25, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • GO 20/199

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hyperventilation Syndrome

3
Subscribe