- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04275973
Evaluating Mobility Interventions in the Real World
This study is intended to test the comparative biomechanical benefits of different lower-limb prostheses and orthoses using data collected over extended periods of everyday life using wearable sensors. Investigator seek to improve physical health, functional activity level, independence, workforce participation, and mental health in participants with lower limb amputation and other lower-limb impairments. Investigator seek to study the similarities and differences in participants' movement using prostheses and orthoses with different technological features or designs. Study team also seek to develop technologies that enhance the methods for using wearable sensor technology to perform this type of study.
Participants with lower-limb amputation, participants who use lower limb orthoses, participants with drop-foot (including a specific group with Multiple Sclerosis), and healthy control participants will be recruited in this study.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Peter G Adamczyk, Ph.D.
- Phone Number: 608-263-3231
- Email: peter.adamczyk@wisc.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Wisconsin
-
Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53706-1539
- Recruiting
- University of Wisconsin
-
Contact:
- Peter G Adamczyk, PhD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Target Populations:
- Participants with amputation must have used a prosthesis for more than 6 months, and wear it for at least 8 hours per day.
- Participants must be more than 6 months past their most recent surgery (if any).
- Participants must be free of musculoskeletal and cardiovascular conditions that would limit their ability to safely complete testing.
- Participants should consider themselves in good health; be able to wear their prostheses or orthoses all day long; be able to perform all of their activities of daily living (ADL) with their prostheses or orthoses as appropriate; have a comfortably fitting functional prosthesis (if applicable) that does not cause any skin problems; and have a stable residual limb (or impaired limb).
- Participants may use a narrow-base cane (single point, narrow tripod base, etc.) as an ambulatory aid but not a small-base quad cane or walker.
- Participants must be able to walk with their prostheses or orthoses for 30 minutes (total) and stand for 30 minutes (total), in individual bouts of at least 6 minutes, without becoming fatigued, feeling dizzy, having chest pain or shortness of breath, or experiencing claudication symptoms.
- Participants involved in running tests must be able to run for 30 minutes (total) in bouts of at least 6 minutes, without becoming fatigued, feeling dizzy, having chest pain, or experiencing claudication symptoms.
- Participants must have no known psychiatric or developmental disability.
- Participants must be fluent in spoken and written English.
- Running portions of the study will be limited to participants who self-report regular engagement in recreational or competitive running.
Control Participants:
- Participants should consider themselves in good health, and be able to perform typical activities of daily living (ADL).
- Participants may use a narrow-base cane (single point, narrow tripod base, etc.) as an ambulatory aid but not a small-base quad cane, wide-base quad cane or walker
- Participants must be able to walk for 30 minutes (total) and stand for 30 minutes (total), in individual bouts of at least 6 minutes, without becoming fatigued, feeling dizzy, having chest pain or shortness of breath, or experiencing claudication symptoms.
- Participants involved in running tests must be able to run for 30 minutes (total) in bouts of at least 6 minutes, without becoming fatigued, feeling dizzy, having chest pain, or experiencing claudication symptoms.
- Participants must have no known psychiatric or developmental disability.
- Participants must be fluent in spoken and written English.
Multiple Sclerosis group:
- For the specific subgroup targeting Multiple Sclerosis, participants must have a clinical diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis and a clinician must determine they are experiencing foot drop.
- Participants must be able to comfortably wear and ambulate with both study devices with effective management of foot-drop, without significant discomfort
- Participants must be able to perform all of their activities of daily living (ADL) with only minimal use of ambulatory aids. Subjects may use a narrow-base cane (single point, narrow tripod base, etc.) as an ambulatory aid in any amount. Use of more comprehensive ambulatory aids (e.g. a small-base quad cane, wide-base quad cane or walker) must be limited to no more than 20% of their walking time when not at home. Participants who do use an assistive device occasionally should report a threshold for use of greater than 100 feet, i.e., they are unlikely to use their device unless they anticipate ambulating greater than this distance.
Exclusion Criteria:
Target Populations:
- Allergy to electrode gel, surgical tape and metals.
- Participants who currently use the Bioness L300 Go or similar neuro-orthoses or use a carbon fiber ankle-foot orthosis at the time of the study will be excluded to avoid biasing results for one device or the other. Participants with past experience not currently using these devices will be eligible.
- Participants enrolled in physical therapy or other rehabilitative care for treatment of gait, balance, or lower extremity strength or coordination at the time of the study will be excluded to avoid confounding effects from therapy and device-based management of their condition.
- For the orthotics study, participants with peripheral neuropathy impacting control of the tibialis anterior muscle via the peroneal nerve will be excluded.
- Participants under treatment for infectious diseases will be excluded from the study.
- Women who are pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the course of the study will be excluded.
- Symptomatic musculoskeletal conditions that prevent unaided walking, such as back pain or knee arthritis.
- Cardiovascular conditions that make moderate exercise unsafe, including (but not limited to) history of angina, peripheral vascular disease, congestive heart failure, history of myocardial infarction, and history of stroke. Potential participants will be excluded if they self-report that a physician has told them to avoid moderate exercise.
- History of chest pain, shortness of breath, or claudication symptoms during ambulation
- History of significant neuropathy with altered balance
- History of serious residual limb pain or phantom limb pain within the past six months.
- History of chronic skin breakdown.
- Inability to perform the tasks involved in the study.
Control participants:
- Allergy to electrode gel, surgical tape and metals.
- Participants under treatment for infectious diseases will be excluded from the study.
- Women who are pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the course of the study will be excluded.
- Symptomatic musculoskeletal conditions that prevent unaided walking, such as back pain or knee arthritis.
- Cardiovascular conditions that make moderate exercise unsafe, including (but not limited to) angina, peripheral vascular disease, congestive heart failure, history of myocardial infarction, and history of stroke. Potential participants will be excluded if they self-report that a physician has told them to avoid moderate exercise.
- Inability to perform the tasks involved in the study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Other: Healthy controls
The Control participants are for methods development and do not constitute a formal study group
|
Different footwear will be used.
|
Experimental: Prosthesis user with transtibial or transfemoral amputation
Experiments will use standard commercially available prostheses for participants with lower-limb amputation.
Specific prostheses will be determined at the time of the study, but they will include prostheses that are fully passive such as energy storage-and-return (ESR) feet, ESR feet with mobilized ankles such as passive hydraulic ankles (PHA), and ESR feet with microprocessor-controlled ankles (MPA).
|
Standard commercially available prostheses for participants with lower-limb amputation. Specific prostheses will be determined at the time of the study, but they will include prostheses that are fully passive such as energy storage-and-return (ESR) feet, ESR feet with mobilized ankles such as passive hydraulic ankles (PHA), and ESR feet with microprocessor-controlled ankles (MPA). |
Experimental: Orthoses user with drop-foot
This arm will consists of participants with drop-foot. A subset of the drop-foot population will be persons with Multiple Sclerosis and currently drop-foot. For participants in this arm, standard commercially-available orthoses or standard-of-care custom orthoses will be used, as well as standard commercially-available electrical stimulation neuro-orthoses. |
Standard commercially-available orthoses or standard-of-care custom orthoses as well as standard commercially-available electrical stimulation neuro-orthoses.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Difference in stride length at identical walking speed
Time Frame: Baseline, 10 days, and 20 days for Orthotic interventions, weekly time points for Prosthetic interventions (baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks), data collected anytime up to 12 weeks on study
|
Difference in stride length at identical walking speed when using different prostheses or orthoses
|
Baseline, 10 days, and 20 days for Orthotic interventions, weekly time points for Prosthetic interventions (baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks), data collected anytime up to 12 weeks on study
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Behavioral gait function as measured from daily stride count
Time Frame: Baseline, 10 days, and 20 days for Orthotic interventions, weekly time points for Prosthetic interventions (baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks), data collected anytime up to 12 weeks on study
|
Behavioral gait function will be measured by daily stride count
|
Baseline, 10 days, and 20 days for Orthotic interventions, weekly time points for Prosthetic interventions (baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks), data collected anytime up to 12 weeks on study
|
Behavioral gait function as measured from preferred stride speed
Time Frame: Baseline, 10 days, and 20 days for Orthotic interventions, weekly time points for Prosthetic interventions (baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks), data collected anytime up to 12 weeks on study
|
Behavioral gait function will be measured by average stride speed
|
Baseline, 10 days, and 20 days for Orthotic interventions, weekly time points for Prosthetic interventions (baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks), data collected anytime up to 12 weeks on study
|
Change in Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility score
Time Frame: up to 12 weeks
|
The Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M) is a 12 item questionnaire. It is a self-report instrument for measuring mobility of adults with lower limb amputation. PLUS-M instruments measure prosthetic users' mobility (i.e., the ability to move intentionally and independently from one place to another). PLUS-M questions assess respondents' perceived ability to carry out actions that require use of both lower limbs, ranging from household ambulation to outdoor recreational activities. The described activities relate to two primary forms of movement, locomotion (i.e., movement in a continuous, repeatable pattern) and/or postural transitions (i.e., movement from one position to another or one type of activity to another). PLUS-M instruments provide a T-score that ranges from 17.5 to 76.6. A higher PLUS-M T-score corresponds to greater mobility. |
up to 12 weeks
|
Change in movement quality as determined by stride width
Time Frame: Baseline, 10 days, and 20 days for Orthotic interventions, weekly time points for Prosthetic interventions (baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks), data collected anytime up to 12 weeks on study
|
Change in movement quality will be determined by stride width
|
Baseline, 10 days, and 20 days for Orthotic interventions, weekly time points for Prosthetic interventions (baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks), data collected anytime up to 12 weeks on study
|
Change in gait performance as determined by stride clearance
Time Frame: Baseline, 10 days, and 20 days for Orthotic interventions, weekly time points for Prosthetic interventions (baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks), data collected anytime up to 12 weeks on study
|
Change in gait performance as determined by stride clearance
|
Baseline, 10 days, and 20 days for Orthotic interventions, weekly time points for Prosthetic interventions (baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks), data collected anytime up to 12 weeks on study
|
Change in gait performance as determined by speed
Time Frame: Baseline, 10 days, and 20 days for Orthotic interventions, weekly time points for Prosthetic interventions (baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks), data collected anytime up to 12 weeks on study
|
Change in gait performance as determined by speed of the participant
|
Baseline, 10 days, and 20 days for Orthotic interventions, weekly time points for Prosthetic interventions (baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks), data collected anytime up to 12 weeks on study
|
Change in gait performance as determined by stride frequency
Time Frame: Baseline, 10 days, and 20 days for Orthotic interventions, weekly time points for Prosthetic interventions (baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks), data collected anytime up to 12 weeks on study
|
Change in gait performance as determined by stride frequency
|
Baseline, 10 days, and 20 days for Orthotic interventions, weekly time points for Prosthetic interventions (baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks), data collected anytime up to 12 weeks on study
|
Change in gait performance as determined by ground reaction forces
Time Frame: Baseline, 10 days, and 20 days for Orthotic interventions, weekly time points for Prosthetic interventions (baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks), data collected anytime up to 12 weeks on study
|
Ground reaction force is force applied by the body to the ground.
Peak forces and shape of the force vs. time trajectory are commonly used to assess gait quality.
Forces closer to "normal" are usually considered better, but this goal does not apply in participants with amputation.
|
Baseline, 10 days, and 20 days for Orthotic interventions, weekly time points for Prosthetic interventions (baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks), data collected anytime up to 12 weeks on study
|
Change in gait performance as determined by socket torques
Time Frame: Baseline, 10 days, and 20 days for Orthotic interventions, weekly time points for Prosthetic interventions (baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks), data collected anytime up to 12 weeks on study
|
Socket torque (also termed "socket moment") is the amount of twisting or bending torque applied to the prosthetic socket.
Peak socket torque and cumulative socket torque are measures commonly used to assess gait quality in persons with lower limb amputation.
|
Baseline, 10 days, and 20 days for Orthotic interventions, weekly time points for Prosthetic interventions (baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks), data collected anytime up to 12 weeks on study
|
Change in Functional Gait Assessment Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 10 days, and 20 days for Orthotic interventions, weekly time points for Prosthetic interventions (baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks), data collected anytime up to 12 weeks on study
|
The Functional Gait Assessment Score will be measured for the sub-population of participants with Multiple Sclerosis (MS).
The total score ranges from 0-30 with higher scores indicating increased impairment in gait.
|
Baseline, 10 days, and 20 days for Orthotic interventions, weekly time points for Prosthetic interventions (baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks), data collected anytime up to 12 weeks on study
|
Change in 6 minute Walking Test Distance
Time Frame: Baseline, 10 days, and 20 days for Orthotic interventions, weekly time points for Prosthetic interventions (baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks), data collected anytime up to 12 weeks on study
|
The sub-population of participants with MS will undergo a 6 minute walking test for distance.
|
Baseline, 10 days, and 20 days for Orthotic interventions, weekly time points for Prosthetic interventions (baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks), data collected anytime up to 12 weeks on study
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Peter G Adamczyk, Ph.D., University of Wisconsin, Madison
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2019-0844
- A196200 (Other Identifier: UW Madison)
- ENGR/MECHANICAL ENGR/MECH ENGR (Other Identifier: UW Madison)
- BA180043 (Other Grant/Funding Number: US Department of Defense)
- Protocol Version 7/30/2022 (Other Identifier: UW Madison)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Lower Limb Amputation
-
Otto Bock Healthcare Products GmbHHanger Clinic: Prosthetics & OrthoticsActive, not recruitingLower Limb Amputation Above Knee (Injury) | Lower Limb Amputation Knee | Congenital Amputation of Lower LimbUnited States
-
Tezel Yıldırım ŞahanCompletedValidity and Reliability of The 3-Meter Backward Walk Test in Individuals With Lower Limb AmputationLower Limb Amputation Below Knee (Injury) | Lower Limb Amputation KneeTurkey
-
Sint MaartenskliniekCompletedLower Limb Amputation Above Knee (Injury) | Lower Limb Amputation KneeNetherlands
-
University of British ColumbiaCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)Not yet recruitingLower Limb Amputation Below Knee (Injury) | Lower Limb Amputation Above Knee (Injury) | Amputation | Behavior | Lower Limb Amputation Knee
-
Otto Bock Healthcare Products GmbHCompletedLower Limb Amputation Below Knee (Injury) | Lower Limb Amputation Above Knee (Injury) | Lower Limb Amputation KneeUnited States
-
Sint MaartenskliniekCompletedAmputation | Lower Limb AmputationNetherlands
-
Liberating Technologies, Inc.Vivonics, Inc.CompletedLower Limb Amputation Below Knee (Injury) | Amputation | Prosthesis User | Amputation; Traumatic, Leg, Lower | Limb; Absence, Congenital, Lower | Amputation StumpUnited States
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire DijonRecruiting
-
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusCampus Bio-Medico UniversityCompleted
-
Northwestern UniversityMinneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center; University of Washington; INAIL...CompletedLower Limb AmputationUnited States, Italy
Clinical Trials on Footwear
-
Staffordshire UniversityIndia Diabetes Research Foundation & Dr. A. Ramachandran's Diabetes HospitalsCompletedDiabetes Complications | Diabetic NeuropathiesIndia
-
High Point UniversityAdidas International, Inc.CompletedFoot | FootwearUnited States
-
Universidad Complutense de MadridCompletedDiabetic Foot | Diabetic Foot UlcerSpain
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentUniversity of Nebraska; Results Group LLCRecruiting
-
University of AarhusAarhus University HospitalCompleted
-
Universidade do AlgarveUniversity of Huelva; OKM Química Ortopédica S.L.; Lola - J. Andrade Ferreira... and other collaboratorsCompletedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2 | Diabetic Peripheral NeuropathyPortugal
-
Palacky UniversityCompleted
-
Tuba MadenCompletedAging | Aging Problems | Aging Disorder
-
University of Massachusetts, AmherstRecruitingArthralgia | Joint Stiffness | Gait MechanicsUnited States
-
University of SalfordCompletedOsteoarthritis, Knee | Meniscus Injury | FootwearUnited Kingdom