Multicentric Prospective Study to Screen Inborn Errors of Metabolism in Non-immune Hydrops (NIH) Fetalis by Massively Parallel Sequencing (ANAMETAB-PRO)

April 16, 2024 updated by: Hospices Civils de Lyon

Multicentric Prospective Study to Screen Inborn Errors of Metabolism in Non-immune Hydrops Fetalis by Massively Parallel Sequencing

A fetal hydrops, also called a fetal anasarca, is the buildup of fluid in the serosa and / or fetal subcutaneous tissue. The diagnosis is made by ultrasound, possibly from the first trimester of pregnancy.

The etiologies of hydrops can be immune or non-immune. The historically classic immune causes are linked to fetal-maternal alloimmunizations in erythrocyte blood groups. The implementation of systematic prevention of these anti rhesus immunizations since the 1970s has significantly reduced the incidence of immune hydrops Non-immune hydrops (NIH) now represent 90% of fetal hydrops. Known causes of NIH can be classified in several ways depending on the mechanism or organ involved.

The prognosis for NIH is closely linked to the cause. Fetal anemia due to maternal-fetal infections can heal spontaneously or give rise to in utero transfusions. Cardiac rhythm abnormalities are accessible to medical treatment. Chylothorax compressions may benefit from in utero drainage, but chromosomal or metabolic causes cannot benefit from antenatal care. The term of pregnancy in which the hydrops is discovered also has an impact on survival, which however remains poor.

In France, certain pathologies can be considered as particularly serious without the possibility of treatment and give rise to a request for medical termination of pregnancy. This possibility is subject to acceptance by two practitioners who are members of a multidisciplinary prenatal diagnostic center (CPDPN). This preliminary multidisciplinary reflection participates in the development of prenatal counseling with the greatest precision in diagnostic hypotheses. This prenatal advice is essential for a couple on the decision to make a pregnancy in progress but also for future pregnancies, given the 25% risk of recurrence due to the autosomal recessive mode of transmission.

Thus the current screening strategy for inherited metabolic diseases on amniotic fluid is fragmented. The resulting subdiagnosis explains the objective of the study of using the new high throughput sequencing techniques (NGS) in this indication. This approach should make it possible to reduce the number of cases classified as idiopathic, to allow the parents concerned to receive suitable genetic counseling with a view to new pregnancies, and to refine the knowledge of the prenatal epidemiology of these pathologies.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Besançon, France, 25000 Besancon
        • Recruiting
        • CHU Besançon
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • MOTTET Nicolas, MD,PhD
      • Bordeaux, France, 33076
        • Recruiting
        • CHU Pellegrin
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • BOUCHGHOUL Hanane, MD,PhD
      • Bron, France, 69500
        • Recruiting
        • Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • MASSARDIER Jérôme, MD, PhD
      • Clermont-Ferrand, France, 63003
        • Recruiting
        • Hopital D'Estaing
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • GALLOT Denis, PU,PH
      • Dijon, France, 21079
        • Recruiting
        • Hôpital Le Bocage
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • ROUSSEAU Thierry, MD,PhD
      • La Tronche, France, 38700
        • Recruiting
        • CHU Grenoble
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Devillard Françoise, MD,PhD
      • Limoges, France, 87042
        • Recruiting
        • Chu Limoges
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • COSTE-MAZAUD Perrine, MD,PhD
      • Lyon, France, 69004
        • Recruiting
        • Hopital Croix Rousse
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • FICHEZ Axel, MD, PhD
      • Marseille, France, 13000
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Hopital Nord
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • CHAU Cécile, MD,PhD
      • Marseille, France, 13005
        • Not yet recruiting
        • CHU Marseille Timone
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • SIGAUDY Sabine, MD,PhD
      • Montpellier, France, 34295
        • Recruiting
        • CHU Montpellier
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • FUCHS Florent, PU,PH
      • Nice, France, 06200
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Hôpital Archet 2
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • ROUZIER Cécile, MD,PhD
      • Paris, France, 75012
        • Recruiting
        • APHP Trousseau
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • JOUANNIC Jean-Marie, PU,PH
      • Pierre-Bénite, France, 69310
        • Recruiting
        • Hopital Lyon Sud
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • THONNON Cyrielle, MD, PhD
      • Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France, 42270
        • Recruiting
        • CHU Saint Etienne
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • PRIEUR Fabienne, MD,PhD
      • Toulouse, France, 31059
        • Recruiting
        • Hôpital Paule de Viguier;
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • DUBUCS Charlotte, MD,PhD
      • Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France, 54511
        • Recruiting
        • CHU de Nancy Brabois,
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • PERDRIOLLE Estelle, MD,PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patient> 18 years old
  • Single Pregnancy
  • Progressive pregnancy greater than 11 weeks: Fetal death in utero in a fetus previously known to be a carrier of non Immun Hydrops (NIH) is not an exclusion criterion.
  • Presence of an ultrasound defined as follows and confirmed by a multidisciplinary prenatal diagnostic center CPDPN:
  • Before 14 weeks: Generalized subcutaneous edema descending to the abdomen, associated or not with peri-visceral effusion
  • After 14 weeks: presence of at least 2 of the following criteria: ascites, pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, subcutaneous edema, placental edema, hydramnios.
  • Persistent hygroma after 14 weeks of amenorrhea
  • Persistent isolated perivisceral effusions without etiologies found
  • Patient having an invasive diagnostic sample (amniocentesis)
  • Social insured in France
  • Patient who signed the informed consent of the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • NIH whose diagnosis is known and confirmed as non-metabolic by a CPDPN
  • Non-progressive pregnancy with Fetal Death in utero with normal previous ultrasound monitoring
  • Refusal of invasive diagnostic sampling
  • Patient under legal protection measure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: pregnant patient whose fetuses have an antenatal NIH
All pregnant patients whose fetuses have an antenatal revelation of NIH from the first trimester ultrasound scan will be included in this study.
Amniotic liquid of each selected patients will be tested by both technic to describe and detect etiological information. Each patient will be tested using the current procedure with a defined panel of genes as well as with the NGS procedure. The results of both procedures will be compared.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of fetuses for which a genetic anomaly responsible for antenatal revelation Non Immun Hydrops by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) analysis
Time Frame: during pregnancy after the 14th week of amenorrhea
Proportion of fetuses for which a genetic anomaly responsible for antenatal revelation Non Immun Hydrops can be detected by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) analysis of the gene panel incriminated in inherited metabolic malformation compared to the proportion of fetuses for which a genetic anomaly has been identified by the technique current standard biochemical.
during pregnancy after the 14th week of amenorrhea

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of percentage of etiology detected between the NGS technique and the biochemical technique.
Time Frame: during pregnancy after the 14th week of amenorrhea
The percentage of the following etiology of interest (Cardiovascular abnormalities, Chromosomal abnormalities, Haematological abnormalities, infections, Thoracic anomalies, Twin-to-twin transfusion syndromes, Uro-Nephrological Anomalies, Abdominal anomalies, Lymphatic dysplasia, Fetal or placental tumors, osteochondrodysplasias. syndromic, Hereditary Metabolism Diseases) will be assessed and compared between the 2 methods.
during pregnancy after the 14th week of amenorrhea
time to return the results in days of NGS techniques
Time Frame: during pregnancy after the 14th week of amenorrhea
The delay of answer will be defined by the time to return the results by analysis of the panel of genes tested compared to the current standard biochemical technique, measured between the date of completion of the prenatal diagnosis procedure and the date of communication of the results to the parents.
during pregnancy after the 14th week of amenorrhea
number of technical failure of these new tools of NGS techniques
Time Frame: during pregnancy after the 14th week of amenorrhea
Number of technical failures: unable to extract DNA, too little DNA, failed sequencing), and analysis of these failures will be measured and compared to the current standard biochemical technique.
during pregnancy after the 14th week of amenorrhea
Number of cases where the interpretation of the genetic variants did not lead to a conclusion
Time Frame: during pregnancy after the 14th week of amenorrhea
by the number of cases where the interpretation of the genetic variants highlighted did not allow concluding on the imputability for the clinical picture will be assessed of these new tools of NGS techniques
during pregnancy after the 14th week of amenorrhea
number of week of amenorrhea of gestation
Time Frame: immediately after the child birth
number of week of amenorrhea of gestation will be measured
immediately after the child birth
issue of the pregnancy
Time Frame: immediately after the child birth
The percentage of death in utero, the percentage of medical termination of pregnancy, the percentage of neonatal survival and the percentage of pregnancy continued until the end will be calculated
immediately after the child birth

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 12, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 12, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 12, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 28, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 16, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 17, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Non-Immune Hydrops Fetalis

Clinical Trials on NON-IMMUNE HYDROPS FETALIS diagnosis

3
Subscribe