Markerless Image Guidance Using Intrafraction Kolovoltage X-ray Imaging for Lung Cancer Radiotherapy (VALKIM)

November 14, 2023 updated by: Dasantha Jayamanne, Royal North Shore Hospital

Validation of Markerless Image Guidance Using Intrafraction Kolovoltage X-ray Imaging Using Implanted Fiducials: Phase I Observational Study of Lung Cancer Radiotherapy

In radiotherapy, tumour tracking allows us to ensure the radiation beam is accurately targeting the tumour while it moves in a complex and unpredictable way. Most tumour tracking techniques require the implantation of fiducial markers around the tumour. Markerless Tumour Tracking negates the need for implanted markers, enabling accurate and optimal cancer radiotherapy in a non-invasive way.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

We will perform a phase I observational trial investigating the feasibility of the Markerless Tumour Tracking technology. Markerless Tumour Tracking will be integrated with existing treatment machines to provide real-time monitoring of tumour motion during treatment delivery. Eligible patients are implanted with fiducial markers, which act as the ground truth for evaluating the accuracy of Markerless Tumour Tracking. The patients will undergo the current standard of care radiotherapy, with the exception that kilovoltage x-ray images will be acquired continuously during treatment delivery and used to calculate online Markerless Tumour Tracking. Markerless Tumour Tracking determines the mean tumour position calculated over the most recent 15 seconds and displays shifts exceeding 3 mm.

The trial will be a single-institution study recruiting only at RNSH Radiation Oncology Department.

As this trial investigates feasibility, our focus will be on estimating the proportion of treatment time in which the Markerless Tumour Tracking is within acceptable limits.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

10

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • New South Wales
      • Saint Leonards, New South Wales, Australia, 2065

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Adults >=18 years with NSCLC

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Aged 18 or older.
  2. Has provided written Informed Consent for participation in this trial and is willing to comply with the study.
  3. Patients undergoing external beam radiotherapy.
  4. Histologically proven Stage I NSCLC or oligometastatic lung metastases (3 or less).
  5. Diagnostic CT prior to insertion of fiducial markers.
  6. Patient must be able to have fiducial markers placed in the lung (if on anticoagulants, must be cleared by LMO or cardiologist).
  7. ECOG performance status 0-2.
  8. A maximum of three metastases to the lung from any non-haematological malignancy. Multiple metastases will be treated separately.
  9. 1 cm ≤ Tumour diameter in any dimension ≤ = 5 cm.
  10. The distance between the tumour centroid and the top end of the diaphragm is <=8 cm.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient has low respiratory performance as evaluated by the physicians.
  2. Previous high-dose thoracic radiotherapy.
  3. Less than one fiducial marker implanted in the lung.
  4. Fiducial markers are too far from the tumour centroid (>9 cm).
  5. Cytotoxic chemotherapy within 3 weeks of commencement of treatment, or concurrently with treatment. Hormonal manipulation agents are allowable (e.g. aromatase inhibitors, selective oestrogen receptor modulators, and gonadotropin releasing hormone receptor modulators).
  6. Targeted agents (such as sunitinib, bevacizumab and tarceva) within 7 days of commencement of treatment, concurrently with treatment or 7 days after radiotherapy.
  7. Women who are pregnant or lactating.
  8. Unwilling or unable to give informed consent.
  9. Unwilling or unable to complete quality of life questionnaires.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Markerless
Markerless Tumour Tracking will be used to observe the radiation beam is accurately targeting the tumour.
Intrafraction Kolovoltage X-ray Imaging using Fiducials

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Markerless Tumour Tracking
Time Frame: 6 months after recruitment
to demonstrate the feasibility of Markerless Tumour Tracking for motion-adaptive lung cancer radiotherapy as assessed by agreement between markerless and marker-based tracking within 3 mm for at least 80% of the beam-on time as assessed in off-line analyses.
6 months after recruitment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Markerless Tumour Tracking outcome
Time Frame: 6 months after treatment of last fraction
To identify cohort of patients on which markerless Tumour tracking performs well or poorly
6 months after treatment of last fraction
Accuracy
Time Frame: 6 months after treatment of last fraction
To quantify the accuracy of marker-based tracking by comparison with MV-kV triangulation or visual inspection
6 months after treatment of last fraction
Magnitude
Time Frame: 6 months after treatment of last fraction
To investigate the magnitude of surrogacy of lung tumour motion, ie the difference between tumour motion and implanted marker motion
6 months after treatment of last fraction
Correlation
Time Frame: 6 months after treatment of last fraction
To investigate the correlation between external and internal motion using infrared/optical imaging
6 months after treatment of last fraction
Suitability
Time Frame: 6 months after treatment of last fraction
To investigate the suitability and frequency of correcting for tumour baseline shifts based on a variety of tolerance criteria and with different methods
6 months after treatment of last fraction
Frequency
Time Frame: 6 months after treatment of last fraction
To investigate the frequency of correcting for tumour baseline shifts based on a variety of tolerance criteria and with different methods
6 months after treatment of last fraction
Feasibility of outcomes prediction
Time Frame: 6 months after treatment of last fraction
To investigate the feasibility of predicting treatment outcomes based on patient and imaging information
6 months after treatment of last fraction
Outcomes
Time Frame: 6 months after treatment of last fraction
Participants will be followed for 2 years to determine patient outcomes, including radiation therapy toxicity, local control (whether the tumour has spread) and survival
6 months after treatment of last fraction
Historical
Time Frame: 6 months after treatment of last fraction
2 year outcomes will be compared to historical outcomes reported from our lung Departmental SBRT database
6 months after treatment of last fraction
Ineligibility
Time Frame: 6 months after treatment of last fraction
To record the number of patients ineligible after marker insertion due to positioning of markers, or due to complications with the implantation procedure
6 months after treatment of last fraction
Radiomic Features
Time Frame: 6 months after treatment of last fraction
To investigate the feasibility of extracting radiomic features from CT, CBCT, and kV images to predict tumour volumes, tracking accuracy, treatment response, and patient outcomes.
6 months after treatment of last fraction
X-ray dose
Time Frame: 6 months after treatment of last fraction
To report additional x-ray dose caused by imaging during treatment
6 months after treatment of last fraction

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dasantha Jayamanne, MD, Royal North Shore Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 4, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 12, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 17, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 16, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on Markerless Tumour Tracking

3
Subscribe