The Impact of High Fidelity Simulation on Stress Level in Medical Students.

May 5, 2020 updated by: Piotr Palaczyński, Medical University of Silesia

High fidelity simulation (HFS) is an established method of training in various fields of medicine, especially emergency medicine, anesthesiology and intensive therapy. One of the benefits of HFS as an educational tool is the protective environment, where the risk of error do not bring harm to the patients.

It is proven that HFS is successful in acquisition of new knowledge and skills and may facilitate positive behavioral change in medical students. However, this education method may cause elevated stress levels as well as other physiological reactions. Other than sympathetic nervous system reactions such as heart rate and blood pressure, there are a few laboratory stress level markers such as cortisol, alpha-amylase, testosterone and secretory immunoglobulin A. Our aim was to evaluate the change of stress level induced by high-fidelity simulation in medical students.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

55

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Silesia
      • Zabrze, Silesia, Poland, 41-800
        • Samodzielny Publiczny Szpital Kliniczny nr 1

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Medical faculty students (fifth and sixth year) scheduled to undergo high fidelity medical simulation as a part of standard scholastic program.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • willingness to take part in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy,
  • active infections
  • diseases of immune system
  • metabolic or endocrine disturbances
  • current use of any medication (except for oral contraceptives)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
High fidelity simulation training
Group consisting of medical students scheduled to undergo high fidelity medical simulation as a part of standard scholastic program.
At the beginning of scheduled classes in the simulation center, students were placed sitting at rest for 30 min. In each team a leader was chosen. Other team members were also assigned detailed functions. Before starting the scenario, participants were oriented for 10 -15 minutes by a physician instructor about the simulation room setup and manikin features. The simulated scenarios were performed using a high fidelity computer-based manikin simulator, with the possibility of remote control of vital signs. All medications and equipment required during the clinical scenarios were available. The scenario used was prepared and validated by experienced simulation instructors. All student groups were given the same standardized scenario.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Α-amylase activity in saliva [U/ml]
Time Frame: 120 minutes
Saliva was collected using a disposable Salivette tube (Sarstedt AG & Co, Germany) by placing a sterile tampon under the tongue or chewing for 30-45 seconds. Next the tube was centrifuged (1000 x g for 10 min.) to obtain a ready to test saliva supernatant. Samples were frozen after centrifugation at - 85°C until performing laboratory tests. Α-amylase activity assay was performed by a static method with AMYLAZA kit (Aqua-Med Łodz, Poland). The samples were diluted 100 times using 0,9% chloride solution. 2-chloro-4-nitrofenylo-maltotrioside is a substrate in this method. The reaction was performed in pH 6,0 MES buffer at 37 ° C rendering a colored reaction product. The product was then analyzed via spectrophotometry at 405 nm.
120 minutes
Secretory immunoglobulin class A concentration in saliva [ug/ml]
Time Frame: 120 minutes
Saliva was collected using a disposable Salivette tube (Sarstedt AG & Co, Germany) by placing a sterile tampon under the tongue or chewing for 30-45 seconds. Next the tube was centrifuged (1000 x g for 10 min.) to obtain a ready to test saliva supernatant. Samples were frozen after centrifugation at - 85°C until performing laboratory tests. Determination of secretory immunoglobulin class A (sIgA) concentration was established using an ELISA (Immunodiagnostic AG, Germany). The analytical procedure was carried out in accordance to the instructions provided by the manufacturer in the user manual. Absorbance readings were taken using a μQuant reader (BioTek, USA), the results were processed using the KCJunior program (BioTek, USA).
120 minutes
Cortisol concentration in saliva [ng/ml]
Time Frame: 120 minutes

Saliva was collected using a disposable Salivette tube (Sarstedt AG & Co, Germany) by placing a sterile tampon under the tongue or chewing for 30-45 seconds. Next the tube was centrifuged (1000 x g for 10 min.) to obtain a ready to test saliva supernatant. Samples were frozen after centrifugation at - 85°C until performing laboratory tests.

The commercial ELISA (Diapra, Italy) were used to determine the concentration of cortisol in saliva. The analytical procedure was carried out with accordance to the manufacturer's instructions in the technical manual supplied with the kit. Absorbance readings were taken using a μQuant reader (Biotek, USA), while results were processed using KCJunior (Biotek, USA).

120 minutes
Testosterone concentration in saliva [pg/ml]
Time Frame: 120 minutes

Saliva was collected using a disposable Salivette tube (Sarstedt AG & Co, Germany) by placing a sterile tampon under the tongue or chewing for 30-45 seconds. Next the tube was centrifuged (1000 x g for 10 min.) to obtain a ready to test saliva supernatant. Samples were frozen after centrifugation at - 85°C until performing laboratory tests.

The commercial ELISA (Diapra, Italy) was used to determine the concentration of testosterone in saliva. The analytical procedure was carried out with accordance to the manufacturer's instructions in the technical manual supplied with the kit. Absorbance readings were taken using a μQuant reader (Biotek, USA), while results were processed using KCJunior (Biotek, USA).

120 minutes
Total protein concentration [mg/ml]
Time Frame: 120 minutes
Saliva was collected using a disposable Salivette tube (Sarstedt AG & Co, Germany) by placing a sterile tampon under the tongue or chewing for 30-45 seconds. Next the tube was centrifuged (1000 x g for 10 min.) to obtain a ready to test saliva supernatant. Samples were frozen after centrifugation at - 85°C until performing laboratory tests. To determine the total protein concentration the Lowry method was used. This method base on the reactions between peptide bonds, tyrosine and Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. The absorbance of the resulting color was read at a wavelength of 650-750 nm, 30 minutes after the addition of the reagent. Bovine serum albumin water solution (BSA - Sigma Aldrich, Germany) at slightly basic pH was used as standard.
120 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Heart rate [bpm]
Time Frame: 120 minutes
Heart rate was measured using a cardiomonitor (Infinity Delta, Dräger; Germany).
120 minutes
Blood pressure [mmHg]
Time Frame: 120 minutes
Blood pressure was measured using a cardiomonitor (Infinity Delta, Dräger; Germany).
120 minutes
Saturation [%]
Time Frame: 120 minutes
Saturation level was measured using a cardiomonitor (Infinity Delta, Dräger; Germany).
120 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 2, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

May 11, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 11, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SSS-01

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stress, Physiological

Clinical Trials on High fidelity simulation training

Subscribe