Open Versus Closed Wedge Distal Femoral Varus Osteotomy for the Valgus Knee. Indications, Clinical and Radiological Outcome (Var_DFO)

March 14, 2022 updated by: University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Var_DFO:Open Versus Closed Wedge Distal Femoral Varus Osteotomy for the Valgus Knee. Indications, Clinical and Radiological Outcome

This study is to analyze the indications of the two most popular techniques of distal femoral osteotomy (DFO) performed in patients with valgus malalignment and symptomatic degenerative changes in the lateral compartment of the knee and to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcome of a case series of patients who have received this operation at the Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology and the Department of Surgery of the University Hospital Basel.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

22

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Basel Stadt
      • Basel, Basel Stadt, Switzerland, 4031
        • Clinic for Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital basel

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients who received a DFO for valgus knee arthritis at the Clinic of Orthopaedics and Traumatology at the University Hospital Basel between 1.1.2013 and 31.12.2017 will be included in this study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients who received a distal femoral osteotomy (DFO) for valgus knee osteoarthritis between 1.1.2013 and 31.12.2017

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Absence of informed consent
  • Absence of X-Rays documenting the preoperative deformity or postoperative result

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
OWDFO: Open Wedge Distal Femoral Varus osteotomy
Data collection from routine medical records (clinical and radiological data)
CWDFO: Closed Wedge Distal Femoral Varus osteotomy
Data collection from routine medical records (clinical and radiological data)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy of the correction of the deformity
Time Frame: at Baseline
The mechanical axis of the femur and the tibia and hence the mechanical tibiofemoral angle (MFTA) will be measured pre- and postoperatively. (the goal of the operation is a neutral alignment, MFTA angle of 0°)
at Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
incidence of disruptive hardware
Time Frame: at Baseline
Information regarding the incidence of disruptive hardware and of hardware removal operations because of this, time needed until bony union is achieved, complications, delayed and non-union rates and need of conversion to arthroplasty
at Baseline
pain level
Time Frame: at Baseline
Information regarding pain levels measured with visual analog scale score (VAS). The visual analogue scale (VAS) is a scale used to determine the pain intensity experienced by individuals. It consists of a line, approximately 10-15 cm in length, with the left side signifying no pain with a smiling face image and the right side signifying the worst pain.
at Baseline
pain medication intake preoperatively and at the final follow up
Time Frame: at Baseline
pain medication intake preoperatively and at the final follow up
at Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Annegret Muendermann, Prof. Dr. med., Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Basel

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 24, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 6, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

May 11, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 15, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Valgus Malalignment of the Knee

Clinical Trials on Data collection from routine medical records

3
Subscribe