FISH in Diagnosis of Biliary Stricture

May 18, 2020 updated by: Vincent Zoundjiekpon, University Hospital Olomouc

Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization in Diagnosis of Biliary Stricture: A Feasibility Study

The management of biliary strictures depends on their correct pre-operative evaluation which remains challenging. Despite the emerging multitudes of new diagnostic opportunities- modalities we have today, there is still a large number of biliary stenosis misdiagnosed with a profound negative impact on the patients´ outcome. The study aims to proove the feasibility and to evaluate the impact of Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization (FISH) on the tissue diagnostic of biliary strictures.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

The management of biliary strictures depends on their correct pre-operative evaluation which remains challenging. Biliary strictures have various etiologies (traumatic, inflammatory, tumoral, ischemic etc), which are necessarily needed to be known for the correct therapeutic approach. Despite the emerging multitudes of new diagnostic opportunities, there is still a large number of biliary stenosis misdiagnosed with a profound negative impact on the patients´ outcome. The dilemma that exists is how to balance the risk of missing the chance of curative surgery for some malignancy and preventing some patients from unnecessary surgery for benign etiologies and not to waste time. Different conventionnal sampling methods (as Brush-cytology, forceps biopsies during ERCP, endoscopic guided fine needle aspiration-EUS-FNA) have relatively low sensitivity. In such cases, the peroral cholangioscopy proves diagnostic accuracy of 90 %. This method remains expert dependent, costly and may be result in complications of cholangitis in 3-5 % of cases. Techniques or others methods less complicated and improving the preoperative diagnosis of biliary strictures are needed. Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization (FISH) was shown to improve the diagnostic yield of routine cytology.

This study will proove the feasebility and the clinical place of FISH in the diagnostic of biliary strictures and evaluate the impact of FISH on management of patients with biliary strictures.

FISH (Fluorecent In Situ Hybridization) is a molecular cytogenetic method, which enables the detection of fluorescently- labeled DNA/RNA or oligonucleotide probes hybridized to metaphase/ interphase. It uses probes to bind to specific DNA/RNA sequences. This enables the detection of aneuploidy for chromosomes 3, 7, 17 and loss of the 9p21 in patients with suspected malignant biliary strictures.

Different methods were used to take samples from the site of the stenosis. Brush-cytology and endocanal forceps biopsies during ERCP and FNA (fine needle aspiration) during EUS (endosonography). These sampling techniques have relatively low specificity and sensitivity. Reason why we will combine FISH with the sampling methods to maximize our chance to early determine the etiology of stenosis and avoid wasting time and unnecessary cholangioscopy. In this study, the positivity of FISH for Chromosomes 3,7,17 is defined by a presence of polysomy of these chromosomes and the positivity of FISH for Chromosomal region defined by a presence of heterozygous delection or homozygous delection for 9p21. Polysomy is defined by a gain of 2 or more chromosomes in 4 cells. For the chromosomal region, the delection or loss of 9p21 must be observed in 12 cells.

Methods:

  • Tissue specimens obtained via either brush cytology, forceps biopsy or fine needle aspiration during ERCP or endosonography (EUS) were examined by routine cytology or histology (RC) methods.
  • In addition, FISH using fluorescent-based polynucleotide probes targeting chromosomes 3, 7, 17 and locus 9p21 was performed (ZytoVysion®).

Success (positivity) is defined by the presence of polysomy for chromosomes 3, 7, 17 and/or the presence of delection or loss of the chromosomal region 9p21 in patients with suspected malignant biliary strictures.

Gold standard for final diagnosis should be the histology from surgery resection. In patients without surgery, a follow up of 12 months will be considered adequate to exclude or confirm malignant etiology of the stritures.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

96

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Vincent Zoundjiekpon, MD
  • Phone Number: 001 00420608080209
  • Email: vincent04@post.cz

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Ondrej Urban, MD, PhD

Study Locations

      • Olomouc, Czechia, 771 00
        • Recruiting
        • 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital and Palacký University,
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Suspected malignant biliary stricture
  2. Localization: Extrahepatic biliary duct
  3. Patient´s consent with a diagnostic procedure
  4. Age : 18 years or more

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Intrahepatic biliary strictures
  2. Duodenal stenosis (endoscopically)
  3. Age : < 18 years
  4. Coagulopathy : (INR >1,5, Platelets < 100)
  5. Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: conventional samplig

Patients with biliary strictures udergo ERCP or EUS. Tissue specimens obtained via either of brush cytology, forceps biopsy or fine needle aspiration during ERCP or endosonography (EUS) were examined by routine cytology or histology methods.

Gold standard for final diagnosis is the histology from surgical resection. In patients without surgery, a follow up of 12 months will be considered adequate to exclude or confirm malignant etiology.

Patients with biliary strictures undergo ERCP o EUS. Tissue specimens obtained via either of brush cytology, forceps biopsy or fine needle aspiration during ERCP or endosonography (EUS) were examined by routine cytology or histology methods. In addition, FISH inlcuding fluorescence-based polynucleotide probes targeting chromosomes 3, 7, 17 and locus 9p21 was performed. Gold standard for final diagnosis is the histology from surgical resection. In patients without surgery, a follow up of 12 months will be considered adequate to exclude or confirm malignant etiology.
Active Comparator: Fluorescence in situ Hybridization (FISH)
Tissue specimens obtained via either of brush cytology, forceps biopsy or fine needle aspiration during ERCP or endosonography (EUS) were examined by routine cytology or histology methods. In addition, FISH inlcuding fluorescence-based polynucleotide probes targeting chromosomes 3, 7, 17 and locus 9p21 was performed. Gold standard for final diagnosis is the histology from surgical resection. In patients without surgery, a follow up of 12 months will be considered adequate to exclude or confirm malignant etiology.
Patients with biliary strictures undergo ERCP o EUS. Tissue specimens obtained via either of brush cytology, forceps biopsy or fine needle aspiration during ERCP or endosonography (EUS) were examined by routine cytology or histology methods. In addition, FISH inlcuding fluorescence-based polynucleotide probes targeting chromosomes 3, 7, 17 and locus 9p21 was performed. Gold standard for final diagnosis is the histology from surgical resection. In patients without surgery, a follow up of 12 months will be considered adequate to exclude or confirm malignant etiology.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proove the feasebility and the clinical place of FISH in the diagnostic of biliary strictures
Time Frame: 1- 7 days
The the sensitivity (%) and specificity (%) of ERCP/ EUS with conventional tissue sampling - Brushing, forceps biopsy/EUS-FNA and ERCP/EUS with conventional tissue sampling completed with FISH in patients with suspected malignant stricture of the common bile duct are evaluated. Success (positivity) is defined by the presence of benign or malignant cells, adequate to make the final tissue diagnosis. Based on the previous studies and the experiences of our endoscopists and pathologist, we can expect the diagnostic yield with FISH will be increased of 20-30% in the study population (the samples size 96).
1- 7 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
evaluate the impact of FISH on management of patients with biliary stricture.
Time Frame: 3-6 months
The proportion of patients (%) who will miss the chance of curative surgery for some malignancy and the proportion of patients (%) who will not have unnecessary surgery for benign etiologies are evaluated.
3-6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Vincent Zoundjiekpon, MD, 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Olomouc, Czech Republic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 3, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 19, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 10, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 20, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Biliary Stricture

Clinical Trials on ERCP with tissue sampling

3
Subscribe