- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01227382
Accuracy of Spybite Forceps When Compared to Conventional Sampling Methods
July 29, 2015 updated by: University of Florida
Prospective Evaluation of the Accuracy of Spybite Biopsy Forceps for the Tissue Diagnosis of Lesion of the Pancreatobiliary System. ( Part of the "The Clinical Utility of Cholangioscopy and Pancreatoscopy in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pancreaticobiliary Disorders" Study)
The investigators are evaluating the use of a SpyBite biopsy forceps for tissue diagnosis when compared to standard biopsy techniques.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The participants will undergo an Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with cholangiopancreatoscopy and evaluation of a bile duct or pancreatic duct stricture with three different types of techniques for biopsy: SpyBite biopsy forceps, cytology brush and RJ3biopsy forceps.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
26
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Florida
-
Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32610
- Shands at UF Ensopcopy
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subjects is 18 years or older
- Scheduled to undergo Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) wiht cholangioscopy and/or pancreatoscopy at the University of Florida Gainesville Florida as medically indicated.
- Lesion of the pancreatobiliary system that requires tissue sampling as medically indicated
- Subject myst be able to give informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any contraindication to Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)
- The subject is unable to give informed consent
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Other: ERCP with Cholangiopancreatoscopy
The subjects who have been scheduled for an Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with Cholangiopancreatoscopy for evaluation of a bile duct or pancreatic duct stricture sampling.
|
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)with cholangiopancreatoscopy and sampling of stricture with SpyBite biopsy forceps, cytology brush and RJ3biopsy forceps
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Percentage of Participants With Accurate Diagnoses of Cancer
Time Frame: up to 7 days after the procedure
|
The diagnostic accuracy of the Spybite Biopsy forceps was compared to both the cytology brush and the RJ3 biopsy forceps sampling of any stricture or biliary lesions found on Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
All three methods were used at baseline to obtain a sample for the determination of cancer vs. no cancer.
|
up to 7 days after the procedure
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Procedure Technical Success
Time Frame: day 1
|
The procedure technical success was defined when all of the following criteria were met: Successful advancement of the cholangioscope to the desired target, adequate cholangioscopic visualization of the area of interest, and successful applications of of all sampling maneuvers with visible tissue seen macroscopically when obtaining mini forceps and standard forceps biopsy samples.
|
day 1
|
Total Procedure Time
Time Frame: 120 minutes
|
The total time to perform ERCP
|
120 minutes
|
Total Cholangioscopy Time
Time Frame: 60 minutes
|
This is the total time it takes for the dye to be performed during the ERCP.
|
60 minutes
|
Cholangioscopy Visualization Time
Time Frame: 30 minutes
|
The portion of the total ERCP time spent on Cholangioscopy visualization.
|
30 minutes
|
Sampling Times for Each Device
Time Frame: 15 minutes
|
The sampling time of the Spybite Biopsy forceps was compared to both the cytology brush and the RJ3 biopsy forceps of any stricture or biliary lesions found on Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
|
15 minutes
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
Adverse events were prospectively evaluated at the end of the procedure, at discharge from the endoscopy unit, and by telephone call 24 hours post procedure.
Adverse events were defined and graded using the 2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy consensus criteria.
|
24 hours
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Peter Draganov, MD, University of Flordia
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
November 1, 2006
Primary Completion (Actual)
May 1, 2015
Study Completion (Actual)
May 1, 2015
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
October 18, 2010
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 21, 2010
First Posted (Estimate)
October 25, 2010
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
August 3, 2015
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 29, 2015
Last Verified
July 1, 2015
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- SpyBite
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Bile Duct Stricture
-
Cairo UniversityTheodor Bilharz Research Institute; National Hepatology & Tropical Medicine...UnknownCholangitis | Biliary Stricture | Bile Duct Injury | Bile Duct Stricture | Benign Biliary StrictureEgypt
-
Sohag UniversityRecruitingIndeterminate Common Bile Duct StrictureEgypt
-
Medical University of South CarolinaNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK); Boston...CompletedIndeterminate Bile Duct StrictureUnited States
-
Medical University of South CarolinaNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK); American...CompletedCommon Bile Duct StrictureUnited States, United Kingdom
-
Corporacion Parc TauliUniversitat Autonoma de BarcelonaCompletedBiliary Tract Diseases | Biliary Stricture | Obstructive Jaundice | Stents | Bile Duct Injury | Bile Duct StrictureSpain
-
AdventHealthUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamCompletedBile Duct StrictureUnited States
-
Soonchunhyang University HospitalCompletedCholedocholithiasis | Bile Duct StrictureKorea, Republic of
-
Inonu UniversityCompletedBile Leak | Biliary Stricture | Bile Duct Injury | Bile Duct StenosiTurkey
-
QualiMed Innovative Medizinprodukte GmbHRecruitingBile Duct Diseases | Biliary Obstruction | Bile Duct StrictureHong Kong, India, Malaysia
-
Northwestern UniversityUniversity of Colorado, Denver; University of California, Los Angeles; University... and other collaboratorsWithdrawnCommon Bile Duct Stones | Bile Duct StricturesUnited States
Clinical Trials on ERCP with cholangiopancreatoscopy
-
University of FloridaCompletedBiliary Tract DiseaseUnited States
-
University of FloridaWithdrawnDisorders of the Pancreatobiliary System
-
Kwang Hyuck LeeWithdrawnHepatocellular Carcinoma | Cholangiocarcinoma | Gall Bladder Cancer | Obstruction of Biliary Tree | Malignant Lymphadenopathy
-
Minia UniversityCompletedGallstones Complicated by CBD StonesEgypt
-
University of CalgaryMcGill University; University of Ottawa; Queen's University; Halton Health (Oakville) and other collaboratorsRecruiting
-
Medical University of South CarolinaNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)CompletedSphincter of Oddi DysfunctionUnited States
-
Azienda Ospedaliera San PaoloCompletedComplications of Surgical and Medical Care: General Terms
-
Northwestern UniversityUniversity of Colorado, Denver; University of California, Los Angeles; University... and other collaboratorsWithdrawnCommon Bile Duct Stones | Bile Duct StricturesUnited States
-
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustCompleted
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityRecruitingCholelithiasis | Choledocholithiasis | Biliary Stricture | Cholangiocarcinoma, Intrahepatic | Biliary StonesUnited States