Efficacy of an Arabic Articulatory Error Remediation Software Program in Patients With Velopharyngeal Valve Dysfunction:

May 18, 2020 updated by: Alaa Mamdouh

Formulatin and Application of a Remediation Software Porgram for Correction of Articulatory Errors in Patients With Velopfaryngeal Dysfunction

To develop a remediation software program that is specific for correcting speech errors in patients with velopharyngeal dysfunction in the Arabic language and test its efficacy, on one group comparing pre and post results

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study was carried on 40 patients having articulation errors in cases of velopharyngeal valve dysfunction attending the unit of phoniatrics, otorhinolaryngology department, Alexandria University.

The patients met the specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. The patient underwent pre intervention evaluation and 3 parameters were chosen to compare efficacy of the program before and after therapy.

these include auditory perceptual assessment of speech, nasometer test and articulation test.

The patient underwent the remediation software program as individual sessions. then after finishing the therapy, the patients underwent post therapeutic evaluation with the 3 specified criteria

Statistical analysis Was carried out using SPSS statistics software version 23. Quantitative data were tested for normality using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The variables which were normally distributed were described by Mean± SD. The variables which were not normally distributed, were described by median (Min-Max). Qualitative data were expressed by numbers and percentages. The results were calculated at a level of significance of 5% or less.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Alexandria, Egypt, 21500
        • Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria universtiy

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

5 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • clinically presented by articulation errors due to velopharyngeal dysfunction
  • Age of 5 years and above with
  • must have normal hearing and vision.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unrepaired cleft palate.
  • Large palatal fistula.
  • Brain damage and intellectual disability.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: the participating group in the intervention
patient complaining of seppch rerrors due t ovelopharyngeal insufficiency and underwent the intervention
A speech therapy computerized intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in Arabic articulation test
Time Frame: base line( pre -intervention)
a qualitative test that define presence or absence of articulation errors
base line( pre -intervention)
change in Arabic articulation test
Time Frame: immediately after intervention
a qualitative test that define presence or absence of articulation errors
immediately after intervention
change in naso meter values
Time Frame: pre intervention
a device that measure nasalance score as a ratio expressed in percentage between nasal sound energy to nasal plus oral sound in patients pre and post intervention for quantitaive assesment of nasal air emission and nasal tone where the lower values mean beteer results
pre intervention
change in naso meter values
Time Frame: immediately after intervention
a device that measure nasalance score as a ratio expressed in percentage between nasal sound energy to nasal plus oral sound in patients pre and post intervention for quantitaive assesment of nasal air emission and nasal tone where the lower values mean beteer results
immediately after intervention
change in Auditory perceptual assessment of speech
Time Frame: pre intervention
A qualitative scale of patient speech : 5 grade from 0( not present) to 4 (sever)
pre intervention
change in Auditory perceptual assessment of speech
Time Frame: immediately after intervention
A qualitative scale of patient speech : 5 grade from 0( not present) to 4 (sever)
immediately after intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
effect of the age factor on nasometer values after intervention
Time Frame: immediately after intervention
statistical tests for correlation
immediately after intervention
effect of the age factor on auditory perceptual assessment after intervention
Time Frame: immediately after intervention
statistical tests for correlation
immediately after intervention
effect of the surgical repair on the nasometer values after intervention
Time Frame: immediately after intervention
comparison between two groups
immediately after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Reham M Elmaghraby, PhD, Otorhinolaryngology department,Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 2, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 23, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

February 9, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 11, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

May 19, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 20, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

It is not yet known if there will be a palne to make IPD available

IPD Sharing Time Frame

for 6 months after puplishing

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Through the Email Address A_abdelhamed14@alexmed,edu,eg

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Articulation Disorders

3
Subscribe