Comparative Results After DSAEK, UT-DSAEK and DMEK for Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystophy (DEMOGRAFT)

Comparative Long-term Results After DSAEK, UT-DSAEK and DMEK for Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystophy and Moderated Pseudophakic Bullous Keratopathy

Purpose of the research is to describe and compare the evolution of BSCVA after DMEK, DSAEK and UT-DSAEK for Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy (FECD) and Moderate Pseudophakic Bullous Keratopathy (PBK). To secondarily research the correlates criterions with best spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) 12 months postoperatively.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The purpose of the research is to Describe and compare the evolution of BSCVA after DMEK, DSAEK and UT-DSAEK for Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy (FECD) and Moderate Pseudophakic Bullous Keratopathy (PBK). To secondarily research the correlates criterions with best spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) 12 months postoperatively.

In a retrospective, single-center, observational study, 218 eyes treated with DMEK (n=110), UT-DSAEK (n=58) and DSAEK (n=50) surgeries were studied. Patients requiring posterior lamellar transplantation for FECD or moderate PBK, with preoperative BSCVA of less than 0.3 logmar, were selected. Patients with pathologies that may seriously affect VA postoperatively were excluded. Graft thickness for DSAEK was measured during the surgery and in vivo at D8, D15, M1, M6, M12 and M24. The primary endpoint was best spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) in logMAR at 6, 12 and 24 months. We deliberately differentiated our postoperative visual results by comparing DMEK with DSAEK or UT-DSAEK with central graft thickness (CGT) measurements carried out either pre-operatively (less than or greater than 130 µm) or post-operatively at 6 months (less than or greater than 100µm). Type of endothelial graft, Donor and recipient's ages, Graft's endothelial cell density (ECD), Rebubbling rate, preoperative VA, graft's indications and surgical time were also tested to explain BSCVA at 12 months.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

218

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Metz, France, 57085
        • CHR Metz Thionville

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

This retrospective study included patients who had undergone posterior lamellar keratoplasty for FECD or moderate PBK indications with a minimum follow-up period of 24 months. The surgical procedures were either DMEK, DSAEK or UT-DSAEK and were performed by the same experienced surgeon (JMP).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients requiring posterior lamellar transplantation for FECD or moderate PBK, with preoperative BSCVA of less than 0.3 logmar,

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with pathologies that may seriously affect VA postoperatively

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
visual acuity
Time Frame: 6 months
The primary endpoint was best spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) in logMAR at 6 months
6 months
visual acuity
Time Frame: 12 months
The primary endpoint was best spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) in logMAR at 12 months
12 months
visual acuity
Time Frame: 24 months
The primary endpoint was best spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) in logMAR at 24 months
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
central graft thickness measurements
Time Frame: 6 months
central graft thickness (CGT) measurements carried out either pre-operatively (less than or greater than 130 µm) or post-operatively at 6 months (less than or greater than 100µm)
6 months
Type of endothelial graft
Time Frame: days 1
Type of endothelial graft
days 1
Donor's ages
Time Frame: days 1
Donor's ages
days 1
recipient's ages
Time Frame: day 1
recipient's ages
day 1
Graft's endothelial cell density
Time Frame: day 1
Graft's endothelial cell density was evaluated via no-contact specular microscopy (NIDEK CEM-530 NIDEK CO. LTD).
day 1
Rebubbling rate
Time Frame: day 1
Rebubbling rate
day 1
Preoperative visual acuity
Time Frame: day 1
Preoperative visual acuity was scored with reference to the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (LogMAR).
day 1
graft's indications
Time Frame: day 1
The indications of the grafts are different between the DMEK groups and the DSAEK and or UT-DSAEK groups: Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophies (FECD) and moderated pseudophakic bullous keratopathies (PBK)
day 1
surgical time
Time Frame: day 1
surgical time
day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 3, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 5, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

June 11, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

June 11, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 5, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Corneal Dystrophy

3
Subscribe