Effect of Dynamic Taping on Landing Kinematics and Kinetics in Volleyball Players With Symptoms of Patellar Tendinopathy

October 27, 2022 updated by: Yi-Fen Shih, National Yang Ming University

Patellar tendinopathy (PT) is the common cause of anterior knee pain, particularly in sports required repeated jumping and landing, such as volleyball. PT clinically presents as anterior knee pain and localized tenderness at the patellar tendon. To evaluate the severity of symptoms of PT, the VISA-P questionnaire is a self-administered, well-validated, and widespread assessment tool. In the long term, athletes would land with knee avoidance patterns and transfer the load to the hip joint caused further hip-related injury. Lower extremities eccentric exercise has been proven the most beneficial treatment of PT. However, the course lasts for three to six months. For athletes who are still in season, it's difficult to get the immediate effect. A newly developed biomechanical taping, dynamic tape, considered to be beneficial for load absorption during muscle eccentric contraction during landing and further normalized the lower extremities load contribution by its viscoelasticity property. However, no past research has confirmed this effect.

Therefore, the aims of the study are to translate the English VISA-P questionnaire to the Chinese and to study the reliability and validity of the Chinese version. In the next part, the investigators investigate the different landing biomechanics between individuals with and without patellar tendinopathy and establish the reliability of different landing tasks, and further explore whether the dynamic tape alters landing biomechanics in volleyball players.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Patellar tendinopathy is one of the most common causes of anterior knee pain, particularly common in sports that required repeated jumping and landing, such as volleyball and basketball. Patellar tendinopathy clinically presents as anterior knee pain and localized tenderness at the patellar tendon. To evaluate the severity of symptoms of patellar tendinopathy, the VISA-P (Victorian institution of sports assessment- patellar tendon) questionnaire is an easily self-administered, well-validated assessment tool and commonly used across several countries. In the long term, athletes would land with knee avoidance landing patterns and transfer the load to the hip joint, which caused the further hip-related injury. Lower extremities eccentric contraction exercise has been proven the most beneficial treatment of patellar tendinopathy. However, the course of treatment needs to last for three to six months. For athletes who are still in season, it's difficult to get the immediate effect. A newly developed biomechanical taping, dynamic tape, considered to be beneficial for load absorption during muscle eccentric contraction during landing and further normalized the lower extremities load contribution by its viscoelasticity property. However, no past research has confirmed this effect.

Therefore, the aims of this study are to translate the English VISA-P questionnaire to Chinese and to study the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the VISA-P. In the next part of the study, the investigators investigate the different landing biomechanics between individuals with and without patellar tendinopathy and establish the reliability of different landing tasks, and further explore whether the dynamic tape alters landing biomechanics in volleyball players. Methods: The first part of the study will include 15 subjects with the symptoms of patellar tendinopathy and 15 healthy subjects to fill out the translated questionnaire. In the second part of the study will include 15 volleyball players with the symptoms of patellar tendinopathy and 15 healthy controls. To compare the landing biomechanics between two groups, all subjects will conduct three landing tasks and the kinematics and kinetics of lower extremities、loading rate of vertical ground force and patellar tendon force will be recorded. In the third part of the study, the investigators will recruit 50 volleyball players with the symptoms of patellar tendinopathy and randomly assign to two groups, the dynamic tape, and sham tape. After taping, subjects will conduct three landing tasks, and the landing biomechanics will be recorded. Statistical analysis: Intra-class correlation, Pearson's correlation, and Mann-Whitney test will be used to analyze the test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, and construct validity of the Chinese version VISA-P. Repeated measures MANOVA will be used to analyze the interaction of landing biomechanics in three landing tasks between patellar tendinopathy group and healthy control, and further, analyze the interaction in three landing tasks between the dynamic tape and sham tape group in landing biomechanics parameters. Alpha level= 0.05

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

23

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Taipei, Taiwan, 11221
        • National Yang Ming University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 35 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. at the age of 16 to 35 years old
  2. volleyball players joined the school team or professional level
  3. over 90 minutes of training time per week -

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. unbearable pain occurred at the patellar tendon when conducting landing tasks
  2. there are currently other acute injuries to the lower extremity
  3. lower extremity has undergone surgery or fracture in the past
  4. with a history of rheumatoid arthritis, systematic and neurological diseases -

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: Sham tape group
in supine, full knee extension position, apply the sham tape from the anterior inferior iliac crest to the middle of the lower leg
The 3M™ Soft Cloth Tape will stick from anterior inferior iliac spine to the middle of the tibia in supine and full knee extension position
Experimental: Dynamic tape group
in supine, full knee extension position, apply the dynamic tape from the anterior inferior iliac crest to the middle of the lower leg
The dynamic tape will stick from anterior inferior iliac spine to the middle of the tibia in supine and full knee extension position

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
lower extremities joint angle
Time Frame: pre-intervention
hip joint flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, internal rotation, external rotation angle, knee joint flexion, extension angle, ankle joint dorsiflexion, plantarflexion, inversion, eversion angle
pre-intervention
lower extremities joint angle
Time Frame: immediately after the intervention
hip joint flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, internal rotation, external rotation angle, knee joint flexion, extension angle, ankle joint dorsiflexion, plantarflexion, inversion, eversion angle
immediately after the intervention
lower extremities joint angular velocity
Time Frame: pre-intervention
hip joint flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, internal rotation, external rotation angle, knee joint flexion, extension angle, ankle joint dorsiflexion, plantarflexion, inversion, eversion angle divided by time
pre-intervention
lower extremities joint angular velocity
Time Frame: immediately after the intervention
hip joint flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, internal rotation, external rotation angle, knee joint flexion, extension angle, ankle joint dorsiflexion, plantarflexion, inversion, eversion angle divided by time
immediately after the intervention
lower extremities joint angular acceleration
Time Frame: pre-intervention
lower extremities joint angular velocity divided by time
pre-intervention
lower extremities joint angular acceleration
Time Frame: immediately after the intervention
lower extremities joint angular velocity divided by time
immediately after the intervention
ground reaction force
Time Frame: pre-intervention
anterior, posterior, medial, lateral, vertical ground reaction force
pre-intervention
ground reaction force
Time Frame: immediately after the intervention
anterior, posterior, medial, lateral, vertical ground reaction force
immediately after the intervention
lower extremities joint force
Time Frame: pre-intervention
calculate the reaction force between segments
pre-intervention
lower extremities joint force
Time Frame: immediately after the intervention
calculate the reaction force between segments
immediately after the intervention
lower extremities joint moment
Time Frame: pre-intervention
calculate the reaction moment between segments
pre-intervention
lower extremities joint moment
Time Frame: immediately after the intervention
calculate the reaction moment between segments
immediately after the intervention
lower extremities joint power
Time Frame: pre-intervention
calculate the reaction moment between segments
pre-intervention
lower extremities joint power
Time Frame: immediately after the intervention
calculate the reaction moment between segments
immediately after the intervention
time to peak ground reaction force
Time Frame: pre-intervention
time period from initial contact to peak vertical ground reaction force
pre-intervention
time to peak ground reaction force
Time Frame: immediately after the intervention
time period from initial contact to peak vertical ground reaction force
immediately after the intervention
loading rate of ground reaction force
Time Frame: pre-intervention
peak vertical ground reaction force divided by time to peak ground reaction force
pre-intervention
loading rate of ground reaction force
Time Frame: immediately after the intervention
peak vertical ground reaction force divided by time to peak ground reaction force
immediately after the intervention
net joint work
Time Frame: pre-intervention
integral of joint power over time
pre-intervention
net joint work
Time Frame: immediately after the intervention
integral of joint power over time
immediately after the intervention
patellar tendon force
Time Frame: pre-intervention
knee joint moment divided by moment arm
pre-intervention
patellar tendon force
Time Frame: immediately after the intervention
knee joint moment divided by moment arm
immediately after the intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
lower extremities joint range of motion
Time Frame: before the landing tasks
hip flexion, extension, internal rotation, external rotation, abduction, adduction, knee flexion, ankle plantar flexion, dorsiflexion, eversion, inversion joint range of motion measured by the physical therapist with a goniometer
before the landing tasks
lower extremities muscle force
Time Frame: before the landing tasks
the hip flexor, extensor, internal rotator, external rotator, abductor, adductor, knee extensor, flexor, ankle plantar flexor, dorsiflexor, evertor, invertor muscle force measured by the physical therapist with a hand-held dynamometer
before the landing tasks
lower extremities muscle length
Time Frame: before the landing tasks
iliopsoas, rectus femoris, hamstring, gastrocnemius and soleus muscle length test measured by the physical therapist
before the landing tasks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Yi-Fen Shih, PhD, Department of Physical Therapy and Assistive Technology, National Yang-Ming University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 20, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 1, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 16, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

July 22, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 28, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 27, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Biomechanical Phenomena

Clinical Trials on Sham tape

3
Subscribe