Effects of an Online Training Program for Physiotherapists About Weight Management for People With Osteoarthritis

A randomized controlled trial for which the primary objective is to evaluate the effects of an online training program on physiotherapist's self-reported confidence in knowledge about weight management for people with osteoarthritis. 80 physiotherapists will be recruited into the study and randomized to one of two arms a) online training program (access to training program for 6 weeks) or b) control group (no access to online training program during the study). Questionnaires will be completed by all participants at baseline, and again at the end of the 6 week intervention period. A biostatistician will analyse blinded, de-identified data.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Osteoarthritis; Overweight and Obesity
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: Online training program in weight management for osteoarthritis

Detailed Description

The Centre for Health Exercise and Sports Medicine at the University of Melbourne have developed a 6-module online training program designed to up-skill physiotherapists in weight management for osteoarthritis patients. This is a randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of the training program on physiotherapist's confidence in weight management for osteoarthritis patients. After providing informed consent and baseline data, physiotherapists will be randomized to either a) an online training program or b) control group. Those randomized to the online training group will be provided access to the a 6-module weight management training program and have six weeks to complete all the modules. Those randomized to the control group will receive no intervention. At baseline and six weeks, primary and secondary outcome measures will be completed in both groups.

The research question is: What are the effects of an online training program designed to up-skill physiotherapists in weight management for people with osteoarthritis? The primary objective is to evaluate the effects of an online training program on physiotherapist's self-reported confidence in knowledge about weight management for people with osteoarthritis.

80 participants will be recruited and randomization into the two study groups. To detect an effect size of 0.8 with 80% power and two sided significance level of 5%, 26 participants are required per group. Assuming a 35% loss to follow up, this will increase the same size to 40 per group (80 in total). The study will be conducted through The University of Melbourne. Participants will be able to access the training remotely in their own time and access all outcome measures online.

A biostatistician will analyse blinded, de-identified data. Analyses will be conducted with participants in assigned groups, with multiple imputation to account for missing data if required. Changes in self-reported confidence scores (primary outcome) will be compared between groups at 6 weeks using linear regression (with group as a factor) adjusting for baseline scores and the stratifying variables. Similar analyses will be conducted for secondary outcomes measured at baseline and 6 weeks. Process measures will be described in terms of mean (SD)/median (IQ range) or number (frequency). Standard diagnostic plots will be used to verify model assumptions.

If an imbalance is noted between groups for relevant baseline characteristics, sensitivity analyses will be conducted including these characteristics as covariates in the models assessing treatment effects.

The biostatistician will also conduct planned exploratory analyses to investigate potential moderators that could influence the effect of the training at 6 weeks. Pre-identified potential moderators include practice location (predominantly private vs predominantly public), baseline self rated confidence in weight management and years of clinical experience. To assess the moderation of the effect of randomised treatment group by the binary potential moderator (practice location), an interaction term between randomised group and the potential moderator, as well as terms for the randomised group and the potential moderator, will be included in the outcome regression model. To assess the moderation of the effect of randomised treatment group by continuous potential moderators (self rated confidence in weight management and years of clinical experience), the multivariable fractional polynomial interaction approach will be applied. This approach allows for nonlinear functional forms of the continuous potential moderator to be included in the regression model for outcomes, with the potential for separate nonlinear functional forms in each treatment group.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 80
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Australia
  • Victoria
    • Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3010
      • University of Melbourne

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Currently registered with the Australian Health Practitioner Registry
• Have access to a computer with internet connection
• Willing to commit to completion of an 8-10 hour online training module if randomized to the intervention group
• Willing to refrain from participating in any weight management professional development activity external to the study for six weeks of intervention
• Able to give informed consent and to commit and participate fully in the assessment and evaluation procedures over the six week period.

Exclusion Criteria:

• n/a

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Single

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: online training program; online training program Participants receive access to online training program consisting of 6 e-learning modules on topics of weight management in osteoarthritis, which they will be instructed to and encourage to complete over the 6 intervention period.	Other: Online training program in weight management for osteoarthritis; An evidence based online education training program for physiotherapists in weight management for osteoarthritis. Training modules cover the following topic areas: Overweight and obesity and osteoarthritis; Overview of weight regulation, overweight and obesity; Examining weight stigma in physiotherapy and personal beliefs about weight; Communication approach for addressing weight management; Interventions for weight management; Health behaviour change support These 6 e-learning modules comprise the online training program, access to which comprises the study intervention.
No Intervention: control group; control group Participants do NOT receive access to the online training program consisting of 6 e-learning modules on topics of weight management in osteoarthritis during the intervention period.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Self-reported confidence in knowledge about weight management for patients with osteoarthritis	Measured using an expert-developed, customized self-reported questionnaire exploring physiotherapists' perceived confidence in knowledge about weight management in osteoarthritis. Total score out of 70 possible points calculated from the responses to 14 Likert Scale (1-5) questions where higher values indicate higher confidence and lower values lower confidence in knowledge	Change from baseline at 6 weeks post randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Self-reported confidence in clinical skills for weight management for patients with osteoarthritis	Measured using an expert-developed, customized self-reported questionnaire exploring physiotherapists' perceived confidence in clinical skills for weight management in osteoarthritis. Total score out of 45 possible points calculated from the responses to 9 Likert Scale (1-5) questions where higher values indicate higher confidence and lower values lower confidence in clinical skills.	Change from baseline at 6 weeks post randomization
Self-perceived competence in nutrition care to patients with chronic disease	Measured using the NUTCOMP Questionnaire, a validated six section questionnaire (four sections scored, two unscored) developed to explore health care professional's perceived competence of the provision of nutrition care. Total score out of 175 possible points calculated from the responses to the Likert Scale (1-5) for each of the 35 questions, where higher values indicate higher confidence and lower values, lower confidence.	Change from baseline at 6 weeks post randomization
Weight stigmatized attitudes	Measured by the Anti-Fat Attitudes questionnaire which comprises 13 statements about beliefs about weight (categorized under Dislike, Fear and Willpower) which respondents answer on a 10 point 0-9 Likert type scale, where 0 = very strongly disagree and 9 = very strongly agree. Total score calculated by response to each statement out of eight. The 3 subscales (dislike, fear and willpower) will also be reported.	Change from baseline at 6 weeks post randomization

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Completion of training modules (process measure)	Data will be collected through the learning management system platform. Completion of module will be categorized by passing end of module quiz with 100%. (Repeat attempts allowed). Number of modules completed reported.	Throughout 6 week intervention period
Usefulness of modules (process measure)	Self-reported using bespoke 4-item questionnaire upon completion of each module. Measured using a 5-point Likert scale from 1= strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree. Items scored individually, higher scores for each item represent positive impressions towards training	Throughout 6 week intervention period
Structure and content of modules (process measure)	Impressions of module length and module content self reported using two custom questions, each assessed as one of 3 multi-choice options. Results for each multichoice option presented as a percentage for the 2 custom questions	Throughout 6 week intervention period
Time to complete each module (process measure)	Self-reported upon completion of each individual module (built into module quiz). Reported in minutes	Throughout 6 week intervention period

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: University of Melbourne
• Collaborators: National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Kim Bennell, PhD, BAppSci, University of Melbourne

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): October 6, 2020
• Primary Completion (Actual): December 15, 2020
• Study Completion (Actual): December 15, 2020

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: September 22, 2020
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: October 1, 2020
• First Posted (Actual): October 5, 2020

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): July 9, 2021
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: July 7, 2021
• Last Verified: July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Body Weight; Joint Diseases; Musculoskeletal Diseases; Rheumatic Diseases; Arthritis; Osteoarthritis; Overweight
• Other Study ID Numbers: UMelbourne

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: No
• IPD Plan Description: No IPD will be shared

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No