High VS Low Flow Nasal O2 for Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure

April 14, 2022 updated by: Belfast Health and Social Care Trust

High Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy for Initial Oxygen Administration in Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure - A Comparison Study of Two Current Standards of Care

Chronic lung conditions such as smoking related lung damage lead to breathing fail. This results in accumulation of gases such as carbon-di-oxide in the body especially during periods of illness known as exacerbation.

Current management of carbon-di-oxide accumulation is administration of oxygen, nebulisers, antibiotics etc and if necessary, provide a tight fitting mask around the face to provide breathing support. If this fails, then a patient is placed on a mechanical ventilator. The tight fitting mask therapy is also called non-invasive ventilation and is used widely but patients acceptability of the therapy is limited.

Providing a high flow of air with some oxygen could potentially provide the same benefit of the non-invasive ventilation and may also be better accepted by patients.

Currently the knowledge and evidence from studies suggest a beneficial role for this high flow therapy but this has not been investigated in well designed studies.

In the proposed study we aim to investigate whether use of the high flow therapy reduces the need for non-invasive ventilation in patients who present with a recent onset accumulation of carbon-di-oxide in their body due to long-term lung disease. If this shows benefit, it will lead to a bigger trial with patient benefiting by reduction in the non-invasive ventilation or indeed a need for an invasive breathing machine.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

82

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Belfast, United Kingdom
        • Recruiting
        • Royal Victoria Hospital
      • Belfast, United Kingdom
        • Recruiting
        • Mater Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adult patients > 18 years of age
  2. Acute Hypercapnic respiratory failure with pH < 7.35 and pCO2 > 6 KPa

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Age < 18 years
  2. Pregnant or Breast-Feeding
  3. Patient cannot read and understand English
  4. Hypercapnia secondary to a drug toxicity or non-pulmonary aetiology
  5. Hypercapnia secondary to exacerbation of asthma
  6. Contraindication to NIV
  7. Contraindication to HFNC
  8. Not for escalation to NIV
  9. pH < 7.15
  10. GCS 8 or less
  11. Shock defined as systolic < 90 mmHg or a reduction by 20mmHg from usual systolic BP despite volume resuscitation
  12. Respiratory or cardio-respiratory arrest
  13. Any other indication that requires immediate invasive/non-invasive mechanical ventilation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: High flow nasal therapy (HFNT)
Characterized by an elevated arterial CO2 (PaCO2) level of > 6kPa due to ventilatory failure. The ventilatory failure relates to the imbalance between the respiratory demand and the capacity of the respiratory system to match the demand.
Controlled oxygen administration using at least 20 L/min of flow rate and titrated up as tolerated. Titration of supplemental oxygen to an arterial saturation between 88 - 92%.
Other Names:
  • High flow nasal insufflation
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Low flow oxygen (LFO)
Characterized by an elevated arterial CO2 (PaCO2) level of > 6kPa due to ventilatory failure. The ventilatory failure relates to the imbalance between the respiratory demand and the capacity of the respiratory system to match the demand.
Controlled oxygen administration using (venturi mask or nasal cannulae) titrated to an arterial saturation between 88 - 92% as the initial oxygen administration method with a flow rate of <20 L/min.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients requiring NIV in each cohort
Time Frame: 6 hours
Proportion of patients who require NIV by 6 hours of intervention.
6 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PaCO2 in Kilopascal
Time Frame: 1 hour, 6 hours and 24 hours.
Blood arterial PCO2 level measured at the pre-specified timepoints or at the nearest timepoint.
1 hour, 6 hours and 24 hours.
PaO2 in Kilopascal
Time Frame: 1 hour, 6 hours and 24 hours.
Blood arterial PaO2 level measured at the pre-specified time-points or at the nearest time-point.
1 hour, 6 hours and 24 hours.
pH
Time Frame: 1 hour, 6 hours and 24 hours.
pH measured for acid-base status.
1 hour, 6 hours and 24 hours.
Respiratory rate (Breath/minute)
Time Frame: At 1 hour, 6 hours and 24 hours.
Rate of breathing per minute as documented in medical notes.
At 1 hour, 6 hours and 24 hours.
Heart rate (Beat/minute)
Time Frame: 1 hour, 6 hours and 24 hours.
Heart rate per minute as documented in medical notes.
1 hour, 6 hours and 24 hours.
Mean arterial pressure in millimeters of mercury
Time Frame: 1 hour, 6 hours and 24 hours.
Mean arterial pressure in millimeters of mercury as documented in medical notes
1 hour, 6 hours and 24 hours.
Intubation rate
Time Frame: 1 hour, 6 hours and 24 hours.
1 hour, 6 hours and 24 hours.
ICU admission
Time Frame: From the date of randomization until the date of first documented admission to ICU, assessed up to 12 weeks.
From the date of randomization until the date of first documented admission to ICU, assessed up to 12 weeks.
In-hospital mortality
Time Frame: From the date of randomization until the date of death or hospital discharge, whichever came first, assessed up to 12 weeks.
From the date of randomization until the date of death or hospital discharge, whichever came first, assessed up to 12 weeks.
ICU length of stay
Time Frame: From the date of ICU admission until the date of last documented ICU discharge or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 12 weeks.
From the date of ICU admission until the date of last documented ICU discharge or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 12 weeks.
Hospital length of stay
Time Frame: From the date of randomization until hospital discharge or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 12 weeks.
From the date of randomization until hospital discharge or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 12 weeks.
Dyspnoea
Time Frame: 1 hour, 6 hours and 24 hours.
Dyspnoea will be assessed assessment using a visual analogue scale (VAS), score range 0-10, higher values represent a better outcome)) if patient has capacity or the Likert scale (score range 1-5; higher values represent a better outcome) to be completed by the clinical team (doctor/nurse/physio) if the patient lacks capacity.
1 hour, 6 hours and 24 hours.
Patient comfort
Time Frame: 1 hour.
Comfort will be assessed assessment using a visual analogue scale (VAS), score range 0-10, higher values represent a better outcome)) if patient has capacity or the Likert scale (score range 1-5; higher values represent a better outcome) to be completed by the clinical team (doctor/nurse/physio) if the patient lacks capacity.
1 hour.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

June 13, 2021

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

March 1, 2023

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

March 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 11, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

November 23, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

April 21, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2022

Last Verified

April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

IPD may be shared on request to the Principal Investigator and will be decided on a case by case basis.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure

Clinical Trials on High flow nasal therapy

3
Subscribe