Social Cognition and Executive Functions in Alcohol Use Disorders - Transverse Study (COSEFEX-T)

January 19, 2026 updated by: CHU de Reims

Investigation of Social Cognition and Executive Functions as Cognitive Vulnerability Markers for the Development and Maintenance of Alcohol Use Disorders - a Transverse Study Design

Over the past few years, researchers and clinicians have stressed the major role of executive and social cognition impairments in the development and the maintenance of Alcohol Use Disorders (AUD).

Executive functions are defined as functions for behavioral control that help us to adjust the investigator's behavior in a flexible way in non-familiar, non-routine situations. Executive functions encompass different cognitive processes, such as inhibition, mental flexibility, updating, planification, abstraction, rule deduction or organization. Studies comparing AUD patients to healthy controls have shown that AUD usually is associated with a large range of deficits. More recently studies have also emphasized a weakness of executive functioning among healthy participants with a positive family history of AUD.

Social cognition refers to all cognitive processes that enable us to communicate and to interact with social environment in an appropriate manner. Among the most common social cognition sub-components are theory of mind (defined as the capacity to understand other people's mental states as for instance beliefs and desires), empathy, and emotion recognition. Emotional and interpersonal difficulties have a high prevalence in AUD and chronic alcohol consumption is often linked to social conflicts, misunderstandings, a lack of social support and isolation. Indeed, AUD patients have difficulties in understanding their own mental states and emotions as well as those of their social environment.

Few studies have investigated the interdependency between these cognitive impairments in AUD while a better understanding of the link between executive functions and social cognition seems crucial in order to better characterize the nature of AUD patients' deficits and thus their caring.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The aim of the study is to describe cognitive processes (theory of mind, empathy, and emotion recognition) and executive functions (inhibition, mental flexibility) in patients with AUD and first degree relatives of patients with an AUD.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

216

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Reims, France
        • Damien JOLLY

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

  1. AUD patients

    Inclusion criteria:

    • Patients between 18 and 60 years old, men or women, following AUD treatment
    • Having a diagnosis of alcohol use disorder according to DSM-5 criteria
    • Patients withdrawn of alcohol for at least 15 days
    • Patients being a native French speaker
    • Patients enrolled in the national healthcare insurance program
    • Patients consenting to participate to the study

    exclusion criteria:

    • A diagnosis of schizophrenia, of any other chronic psychotic state, or of bipolar disorder according to DSM-5 criteria
    • The presence of a current depressive episode as defined by DSM-5 criteria
    • The presence of another substance use disorder during the six months preceding the study, except for tobacco dependence.
    • The presence of any intellectual disability, of pervasive developmental disorders or learning difficulties (especially of dysphasia and dyspraxia)
    • The presence of any neurological disorder or any other disorder affecting the central nervous system including Korsakoff syndrome or Wernicke's encephalopathy
    • Having any uncorrected auditory or visual deficits
  2. First-degree relatives of AUD patients

    Inclusion criteria:

    • Participants between 18 and 60 years old, men or women
    • Current and past absence of any alcohol use disorder or any other substance use disorder as defined by DSM-5 diagnostic criteria
    • Participants having at least one first-degree relative presenting an alcohol use disorder (father or sibling)
    • Participants being a native French speaker
    • Participants enrolled in the national healthcare insurance program
    • Participants consenting to participate to the study

    exclusion criteria:

    • The presence of any alcohol use disorder or any other substance use disorder as defined by DSM-5 diagnostic criteria, except for tobacco dependence
    • A diagnosis of schizophrenia, of any other chronic psychotic state, or of bipolar disorder according to DSM-5 criteria
    • The presence of a current depressive episode as defined by DSM-5 criteria
    • The presence of any alcohol use disorder in the participant's biological mother in order to exclude fetal alcohol spectrum disorders due to prenatal alcohol intoxication
    • The presence of any intellectual disability, of pervasive developmental disorders or learning difficulties (especially of dysphasia and dyspraxia)
    • The presence of any neurological disorder or any other disorder affecting the central nervous system
    • Participants having any uncorrected auditory or visual deficits
  3. Healthy control participants (the inclusion and non-inclusion criteria of investigation groups 2 and 4 are identical):

Inclusion criteria:

  • Participants between 18 and 60 years old, men or women
  • Current and past absence of any alcohol use disorder or any other substance use disorder as defined by DSM-5 diagnostic criteria
  • Participants being a native French speaker
  • Participants enrolled in the national healthcare insurance program
  • Participants consenting to participate to the study

exclusion criteria:

  • The presence of any alcohol use disorder or any other substance use disorder as defined by DSM-5 diagnostic criteria, except for tobacco dependence
  • A diagnosis of schizophrenia, of any other chronic psychotic state, or of bipolar disorder according to DSM-5 criteria
  • The presence of a current depressive episode as defined by DSM-5 criteria
  • Having any first-degree relative with alcohol use disorder (parents, siblings, children) according to DSM-5 diagnostic criteria
  • The presence of any intellectual disability, of pervasive developmental disorders or learning difficulties (especially of dysphasia and dyspraxia)
  • The presence of any neurological disorder or any other disorder affecting the central nervous system
  • Participants having any uncorrected auditory or visual deficits

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: AUD patients
Alcohol Use Disorder patients

Investigation of executive and social cognition processes using a comprehensive, neuropsychological assessment, An Eye tracking investigation and Task-based MRI exams.

  • Evaluation of addictive, psychiatric and neurological comorbidities.
  • Neuropsychological assessment establishing the participants' cognitive profiles of executive functions and of social cognition
  • An Eye tracking investigation aiming at a better understanding of participants' emotional processing
  • Task-based MRI exams identifying participants' neuroanatomical and neurofunctional correlates of executive functions and of social cognition processes
Experimental: AUD controls
Healthy control participants matched to group 1

Investigation of executive and social cognition processes using a comprehensive, neuropsychological assessment, An Eye tracking investigation and Task-based MRI exams.

  • Evaluation of addictive, psychiatric and neurological comorbidities.
  • Neuropsychological assessment establishing the participants' cognitive profiles of executive functions and of social cognition
  • An Eye tracking investigation aiming at a better understanding of participants' emotional processing
  • Task-based MRI exams identifying participants' neuroanatomical and neurofunctional correlates of executive functions and of social cognition processes
Experimental: First-degree relatives
Healthy first-degree relatives of AUD patients

Investigation of executive and social cognition processes using a comprehensive, neuropsychological assessment, An Eye tracking investigation and Task-based MRI exams.

  • Evaluation of addictive, psychiatric and neurological comorbidities.
  • Neuropsychological assessment establishing the participants' cognitive profiles of executive functions and of social cognition
  • An Eye tracking investigation aiming at a better understanding of participants' emotional processing
  • Task-based MRI exams identifying participants' neuroanatomical and neurofunctional correlates of executive functions and of social cognition processes
Experimental: First-degree controls
Healthy control participants matched to group 3

Investigation of executive and social cognition processes using a comprehensive, neuropsychological assessment, An Eye tracking investigation and Task-based MRI exams.

  • Evaluation of addictive, psychiatric and neurological comorbidities.
  • Neuropsychological assessment establishing the participants' cognitive profiles of executive functions and of social cognition
  • An Eye tracking investigation aiming at a better understanding of participants' emotional processing
  • Task-based MRI exams identifying participants' neuroanatomical and neurofunctional correlates of executive functions and of social cognition processes

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Executive functions: mental flexibility performances and processing speed
Time Frame: Day 0

Evaluated through the Trail Making Test (TMT parts A and B). In part A the participant must connect as quick as possible all the numbers on a sheet of paper in ascending order (1-25). In part B the participant is asked to connect all the numbers in ascending order (1-13) and all the letters according to their alphabetical order (A-L) whilst alternating between numbers and letters and without lifting the pencil. For both parts is reported the time necessary for task completion in seconds.

(Reitan RM, Wolfson D (1985) The Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery. Neuropsychology Press, Tucson, AZ.)

Day 0
Executive functions: mental flexibility performances
Time Frame: Day 0

Evaluated through the Plus-Minus test. In this test, the participant is presented with three lists of 30 two-digit numbers. At first, the participant is asked to add three to all the numbers of a first list (+3). He must then subtract three from all the numbers of a second list (-3) and finally he must alternate between addition and subtraction when presented with a third list (+3/-3). Are measured the completion times for the three lists and participant's error rate.

(Miyake A, Friedman NP, Emerson MJ, Witzki AH, Howerter A, Wager TD (2000) The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "Frontal Lobe" tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology 41, 49-100.)

Day 0
Executive functions: prepotent response inhibition
Time Frame: Day 0

Evaluated through the Stroop test. The participant is shown three different slides with 100 items for 45s each. On the first slide are written color words (Color-word congruent condition) that the participant must read as quickly as possible. On the second slide are shown color patches (Color congruent condition) that the participants must name as quickly as possible. Finally, in the third condition, the participant is shown color words written in different colors and must try to name the color of the ink of the word without reading it (Interference condition). Are collected the completion times for the tree slides as well as self-corrected and uncorrected errors.

(Golden C.J (1976) Identification of brain disorders by the Stroop color and word test. Journal of Clinical Psychology 32, 654-658)

Day 0
Executive functions: inhibition of an ongoing motor response
Time Frame: Day 0

Evaluated through the Stop signal task. The participant is presented with a series of photographs showing human faces and is instructed to categorize the photographs according to gender (Go trials). From time to time a red circle appears around the face after a variable time interval and the participant must then withhold his response (Stop trials). Are measured the response time on Go trials, the number and type of errors and the Stop Signal Reaction Time (SSRT).

(Verbruggen F., & Logan G.D. (2008) Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm. Trends in cognitive sciences 12, 418-424.)

Day 0
Social cognition: facial emotion recognition
Time Frame: Day 0

Evaluated through a test of facial emotion recognition (TREF). The participant is shown 54 photographs depicting 6 different emotions of variable intensity (joy, anger, sadness, disgust, contempt, fear) for which he must choose the corresponding emotion label. Are measured participant's response times, the number of correct responses (score out of 54) and type of errors.

(Gaudelus, B., Virgile, J., Peyroux, E., b, Leleu, A., c, Baudouin J.Y., Franck N. (2015). Mesure du déficit de reconnaissance des émotions faciales dans la schizophrénie. Étude préliminaire du test de reconnaissance des émotions faciales (TREF). L'encéphale 41(3), 251-259.)

Day 0
Social cognition: cognitive and affective theory of mind
Time Frame: Day 0

Evaluated through The Movie of Assessment for Social Cognition (MASC). The participant is shown a movie of approximately 15 minutes displaying people interacting with each other. From time to time, the movie is stopped, and the participant must answer different questions relating to the thoughts and feelings of the characters. Are measured the number of correct responses out of 45.

(Dziobek I, Fleck S, Kalbe E, Rogers K, Hassenstab J, Brand M, Kessler J, Woike JK, Wolf OT, Convit A.J (2006). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 36(5), 623-36.)

Day 0

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration of ocular fixations
Time Frame: Day 0
The mean duration of fixations will be evaluated using eye tracking. The participant is shown photographs of primary emotions and during the presentation are recorded his eye movements.
Day 0
Number of ocular saccades
Time Frame: Day 0
The number of saccades will be evaluated using eye tracking. The participant is shown photographs of primary emotions and during the presentation are recorded his eye movements.
Day 0
Localization of the first ocular fixation
Time Frame: Day 0
The localization of the first fixation will be evaluated using eye tracking. The participant is shown photographs of primary emotions and during the presentation are recorded his eye movements.
Day 0
fMRI behavioral responses during a cognitive and affective theory of mind task
Time Frame: Day 0
During the task will be recorded the participant's behavioral performance (number of correct responses).
Day 0
fMRI activations during a cognitive and affective theory of mind task
Time Frame: Day 0
Brain regions significantly activated during the task will be recorded as shown by the variations in the BOLD signal (whole brain analysis).
Day 0

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 9, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 5, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 5, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 16, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 26, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

November 30, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 21, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 19, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alcohol Use Disorder

Clinical Trials on Analysis of executive functioning and of social cognition processes

Subscribe