Dual Task Training for Cerebellar Ataxia

The Role of Integrated Cognitive and Balance (Dual-task) Training in Balance and Fall Risk in Individuals With Cerebellar Ataxia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Combining cognitive training with physical training to improve balance is a new approach for reducing the risk of falls in patient populations who are at risk for falls. People with brain pathology including cerebellar ataxia (CA) have difficulty in performing dual-tasks. Deficiency in dual-task performance relative to single-task performance referred to as dual-task cost is high in CA. Due to the high demands on cognitive resources, people with CA have higher falls rates during activities that involve dual tasking. Tai-Chi involves both cognition and physical movements making it a dual-tasking activity. However, previous study on the effects of 12-weeks of 8-form Tai-Chi did not demonstrate that it had beneficial effects in reducing falls among CA population. This null finding could potentially be due to (1) the lower levels of cognitive demands of Tai-Chi exercise, (2) the intervention not being intensive enough, or (3) the intervention may not have targeted the specific symptoms of CA. To determine if adding structured cognitive demands to conventional balance and coordination training (i.e., addressing all three possibilities for our previous null findings), the investigaotrs conducted a pilot study (n=5) to evaluate the feasibility, safety and benefits of a Cognitive-coupled Intensive Balance Training (CIBT) program. The more intensive and focused CIBT intervention reduced dual-task cost, improved balance, and reduced the number of falls in a sample of individuals with CA. Important next steps is to (1) evaluate the efficacy of the CIBT in a fully powered clinical trial, (2) understand the mechanisms underlying the benefits of CIBT training, and (3) determine the cost-benefits of this intervention. The hypothesis for the study includes (1) CIBT will improve balance and reduce falls; (2) reduction in dual-task cost of balance and cognitive performance will mediate a reduction in the number of falls in CA and (3) CIBT will be a cost-effective treatment option for improving balance and reduce falls. To test these hypotheses, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with economic evaluation will be conducted over a period of two years to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of dual-task (CIBT) training compared with single-task (conventional balance: active control) training in individuals with CA.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Cerebellar Ataxia
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: Dual-task training

Detailed Description

Frequent falls in people with cerebellar ataxia (CA) is a significant problem because it increases the burden of disease to both the individual and the healthcare system. Therefore, an intervention that could improve balance and reduce the number of falls is of paramount importance from the patients' perspective. Although the incidence of CA in the population is not as high as the other neurological disorders such as stroke and Parkinson's disease, the disability and its negative impact on quality of life are significant for those suffering from CA. Moreover, research that results in more knowledge regarding the factors that contribute to falls and the efficacy of treatments that reduce falls in this population could inform research into fall prevention in other populations of individuals at risk for falls, including otherwise healthy elderly adults. Individuals with CA have poor coordination, balance and postural control; all of these contribute to them having frequent falls. People with CA also present with varying degrees of cognitive impairments making it difficult for them to perform dual-tasks in daily activities. Dual tasking has been found to deteriorate the performance of either or both tasks in people with CA. The deficiency in dual-task performance relative to single-task performance referred to as dual-task cost is high in CA. Falls incidence in people with CA increases during daily activities that involve dual tasking. Tai-Chi is a form of dual-task training. Previous study of the Tai-Chi to improve balance and prevent falls in people with CA found some beneficial effects of Tai-Chi on improving balance, but it did not reduce falls incidence. The investigaotrs speculate the lack of beneficial effects of Tai-Chi on falls incidence was due to the Tai-Chi intervention being inadequately intense, especially with respect to its cognitive demand. Other available interventions to improve balance and reduce falls do not address the dual-task cost of balance performance in this population. However, dual-task training is found to reduce dual-task cost and reduce falls in people other neurological disorders and therefore has the potential to reduce falls in CA. To evaluate this possibility, the investigators developed and piloted the Cognitive-coupled Intensive Balance Training (CIBT) that combines cognitive demand to intensive balance and coordination training for reducing the dual-task cost of balance and cognitive performance, improve balance and consequently reduce the number of falls. The pilot study found that CIBT is safe, feasible and potentially effective in reducing the dual-task cost of balance performance, improving functional balance and reducing falls in people with CA. Evaluating the efficacy of this program in a fully powered clinical trial and understanding the mechanisms underlying the effectiveness of the CIBT on balance and falls are important next steps of our research program. Here the investigators propose a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare the treatment benefits of the dual-task (experimental: CIBT) training against the single-task (active control: conventional balance, coordination and cognition) training for reducing dual-task cost, improving balance and reduce the number of falls in participants with CA, evaluating both the efficacy and the mechanisms of dual-task training. In addition, the investigators propose to conduct an economic evaluation alongside the RCT at a healthcare perspective of Hong Kong to compare the cost-effectiveness of dual-task training against single-task training, in preparation for the development of any future trials. This study finding will have important clinical implications by clarifying if adding a cognitive demand to routine balance and coordination training will result in additional benefits on improving balance and reducing falls in comparison with usual care in people with CA. The findings will also have important implications for increasing the efficacy of falls prevention programs in other populations with neurological deficits who are at risk for falls. Our specific objectives are:

Objective 1: To evaluate the effectiveness of the dual-task (CIBT- experimental) training compared with single task (conventional intensive balance, coordination and cognitive- active control) training on functional balance and number of falls.

Hypothesis 1: Both dual-task and single-task training will improve functional balance, however, the dual-task training will be more effective in reducing the number of falls.

Objective 2: To identify the mechanism underlying the effectiveness of the dual-task training on functional balance and the number of falls; that is, to evaluate the extent to which treatment-related changes in the functional balance and dual-task cost of balance and cognitive performance mediate the reduction in the number of falls.

Hypothesis 2: Improvement in functional balance resulting in the reduction of number of falls will be mediated by the reduction in the dual-task cost of balance and cognitive performances.

Objective 3: Compare the cost-effectiveness of the dual-task and single-task training for preventing falls.

Hypothesis 3: Dual-task training will be superior in terms of cost-effectiveness than the single-task from a health-care perspective of Hong Kong

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 36
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Hong Kong
  • Kowloon
    • Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, 00
      • The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Men and women in the age group of 18-60 years;
• Confirmed diagnosis of CA (of any type);
• Able to walk independently with or without walking assistive aids.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Previous history of other neurological diseases (such as Parkinson's disease, stroke, or polyneuropathies) or musculoskeletal problems severely impairing balance, gait or motor performance;
• Able to walk only with handheld support
• Severe visual impairment preventing from exercise participation and
• Severe cognitive impairment with scores <16 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scale

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Single

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dual-task group; Dual-task (CIBT- experimental) group participants will receive 10 minutes of warm up, 40 minutes of CIBT training and 10 minutes of cool down exercises. CIBT program includes performing four types of cognitive tasks during sit to stand, standing with feet apart, one leg, tandem standing, multidirectional reaching, stair climbing and walking (10 metres) tasks. The four cognitive tasks will include: counting backwards by subtracting 4 numbers (for mental tracking ), naming fruits, vegetables, or animals (for working memory), auditory cues for performing activities, example, perform heel raise when you hear the alphabet H (for improving attention and auditory discrimination), short story telling (for verbal fluency). In addition, falls prevention strategies will be taught.	Other: Dual-task training; Dual-task (CIBT- experimental) group participants will receive 10 minutes of warm up, 40 minutes of CIBT training and 10 minutes of cool down exercises. CIBT program includes performing four types of cognitive tasks during sit to stand, standing with feet apart, one leg, tandem standing, multidirectional reaching, stair climbing and walking (10 metres) tasks. The four cognitive tasks will include: counting backwards by subtracting 4 numbers (for mental tracking ), naming fruits, vegetables, or animals (for working memory), auditory cues for performing activities, example, perform heel raise when you hear the alphabet H (for improving attention and auditory discrimination), short story telling (for verbal fluency). In addition, falls prevention strategies will be taught.; Other Names: Physical and cognitive exercises
Active Comparator: Single-task group; Single-task (conventional balance, coordination and cognitive training- active control) group participants will receive 10 minutes of warm-up, 20 minutes of conventional balance and coordination exercises that are in accordance to previously published literature, 20 minutes of cognitive training as single-task (same 4 tasks provided for the CIBT) and 10 minutes of cool down. In addition, falls prevention strategies will also be taught.	Other: Dual-task training; Dual-task (CIBT- experimental) group participants will receive 10 minutes of warm up, 40 minutes of CIBT training and 10 minutes of cool down exercises. CIBT program includes performing four types of cognitive tasks during sit to stand, standing with feet apart, one leg, tandem standing, multidirectional reaching, stair climbing and walking (10 metres) tasks. The four cognitive tasks will include: counting backwards by subtracting 4 numbers (for mental tracking ), naming fruits, vegetables, or animals (for working memory), auditory cues for performing activities, example, perform heel raise when you hear the alphabet H (for improving attention and auditory discrimination), short story telling (for verbal fluency). In addition, falls prevention strategies will be taught.; Other Names: Physical and cognitive exercises

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Dual-task cost of balance performance will be assessed for the TUG	Based on the scores of the standard TUG (single task), d-TUG (dual-task TUG) test and standard counting backwards, the dual-task cost of balance performance will be estimated using the formula: (d-TUG - Standard TUG)/ Standard-TUG) × 100.	0 weeks
Dual-task cost of balance performance will be assessed for the TUG	Based on the scores of the standard TUG (single task), d-TUG (dual-task TUG) test and standard counting backwards, the dual-task cost of balance performance will be estimated using the formula: (d-TUG - Standard TUG)/ Standard-TUG) × 100.	Change score at 10 weeks and 34 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
SOT	Will be assessed using the Bertec ® system. Ability to stand unsupported in conditions challenging the visual, vestibular and somato-sensory inputs will be assessed.50 We will assess (1) equilibrium score using the center of gravity (COG) sway of each condition, (2) composite equilibrium score and (3) sensory analysis ratio.	0 weeks, 6 weeks, 10 weeks and 34 weeks
Limits of stability (LOS)	Will be assessed using the Bertec ® system. The LOS assesses the ability to shift weight in 8 difference directions. We will assess Reaction time (RT) and Maximal Excursion (MxE)	0 weeks, 6 weeks, 10 weeks and 34 weeks
Number of falls	Number of falls will be obtained used digital diary. We operationally define a fall as an event when the person ends up on the ground or other surfaces due to a trip or any other unintentional activity, and a near fall as an unexpected loss of balance that did not result in complete loss of upright standing.	0 weeks, 6 weeks, 10 weeks and 34 weeks
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA),	MoCA estimates memory, executive function, attention, language, abstraction, naming, delayed recall and orientation.45 This brief tool scores cognitive function out of 30, with a higher score equating to better function.	0 weeks, 6 weeks, 10 weeks and 34 weeks
Scale for the Assessment & Rating of Ataxia (SARA)	Is a measure for rating severity of ataxia.52 SARA has eight sub-components with a total score of 40, higher scores indicating greater severity of symptoms due to ataxia. It is reported to have good reliability, validity and responsiveness in CA	0 weeks, 6 weeks, 10 weeks and 34 weeks
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)	Is a measure of dynamic balance scored out of 56, higher scores indicating better balance. The BBS is found reliable and validity in people with CA	0 weeks, 6 weeks, 10 weeks and 34 weeks
EuroQol-5-dimension-5- level (EQ-5D-5L).	Health status will be assessed using the EuroQol-5-dimension-5-level (EQ-5D-5L). It is a standardised measure of health status used for economic appraisal	0 weeks, 6 weeks, 10 weeks and 34 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
• Collaborators: University of Pittsburgh; Chinese University of Hong Kong; National University, Singapore

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): March 1, 2021
• Primary Completion (Actual): April 30, 2022
• Study Completion (Actual): April 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: November 11, 2020
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: November 23, 2020
• First Posted (Actual): December 1, 2020

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): May 11, 2022
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: May 10, 2022
• Last Verified: October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Balance training; Dual-task; Fall prevention; Economic evaluation
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Brain Diseases; Central Nervous System Diseases; Nervous System Diseases; Neurologic Manifestations; Dyskinesias; Cerebellar Diseases; Ataxia; Cerebellar Ataxia
• Other Study ID Numbers: P0030895

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: No

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No