Neuromodulation of Social Skills in Childhood Ataxia

March 3, 2020 updated by: IRCCS Eugenio Medea

Neuromodulation Technique for the Rehabilitation of Social Skills in Childhood Ataxia

The present study aims to define a protocol of electrical stimulation of the cerebellum via transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with a virtual reality protocol to assist the rehabilitation of social skills in adolescents and young adults with childhood ataxia.

Taking into account the high neuronal density of the cerebellum, its strong connection with the cerebral cortex, and its involvement in motor, cognitive and affective processes, as well its involvement in social prediction abilities, the investigators hypothesized that excitatory stimulation of the cerebellum might improve social prediction abilities in adolescents and young adults with childhood ataxia. Moreover, as suggested by previous studies investigating the effect of tDCS in paediatric population, the investigators expected that tDCS will be safe and well tolerated. Such a result would encourage the use of non-invasive brain stimulation in the rehabilitation of social skills in childhood ataxia.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

The investigators planned a single centre, randomized stratified, double-blind, sham- controlled design.

Adolescents and young adults with childhood ataxia will be recruited and randomly assigned to two different groups: the active-tDCS group and the sham-tDCS group. Each group will undergo a multi-sessions (8 sessions) intervention during which tDCS will be delivered over the cerebellum. The stimulation will be paired with a virtual reality VR training. The Virtual Reality (VR) training will exploit a design based on probabilistic learning of social events in child-friendly environments. During the training, participants will be asked to conquer some goal/objects by predicting the behaviour of some competing virtual avatars whose actions should be probabilistically learned. Based on the same structures, two different child-friendly scenarios will be created and they will be respectively used in the pre- and in the post-training evaluation sessions (scenario A) or in association with the tDCS protocol throughout the 8 sessions of intervention (scenario B).

Participants' abilities of social prediction (primary outcome) will be tested through a validated computer based Action prediction task assessing participants' abilities in predicting others' actions based on previous experience. This experimental paradigm comprises a probabilistic learning (familiarization) phase and a testing phase. In the familiarization phase participants are asked to observe an actor performing two different types of grasping actions (such as grasping movement of an apple for eating the apple or for offering the apple to another partner) in different colour-cued contexts. They are asked to recognise actor's intention.

Crucially, the probability of co-occurrence between one action and the colour-cued context is implicitly biased with pre-established probability of association. In the testing phase, the same videos are presented but their length is dramatically shortened via temporal occlusion before the action is completed. In this way, since the movement kinematics is ambiguous, an observer would use the previously learned association with context to predict the fate of the action, and responses should be biased toward the contextual priors. A control non-social prediction task with a similar structure will be also used. A standard neuropsychological assessment (NEPSY-II) before and after the training will allow assessing the generalizability of the effects to general social perception abilities, in particular Theory of Mind and affect recognition (Secondary Outcomes). In the post-training and in the follow-up evaluation session (one month after the end of the intervention) the training acceptability and the quality of life assessments will be performed.

The protocol will allow testing the efficiency of the combined tDCS+ VR training in:

  • enhancing social prediction abilities in childhood ataxia;
  • enhancing implicit learning abilities, even in non social contexts;
  • improving theory of mind abilities;
  • improving patients' quality of life;
  • further investigating the safety and tolerability of tDCS.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

11 years to 25 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Adolescents and young adults who aged 11-25 years
  • Childhood ataxia
  • Intelligence Quotient > 80

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of contraindication to tDCS (history of epilepsy, migraine, severe brain trauma; presence of metal in the brain/skull or implanted neurostimulator, cardiac pacemaker; state of pregnancy)
  • Intake of or withdrawal from some drugs potentially changing the seizure threshold
  • Presence of comorbidity with an important medical conditions
  • Severe sensorial, motor and/or behavioural problems that could interfere with the use of GRAIL/VR technology

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active-tDCS group
8 sessions (in two weeks) of active tDCS combined with a virtual reality training
Active anodal-tDCS will be delivered over the cerebellum for 8 sessions in two weeks. tDCS will be delivered via a battery driven direct current stimulator. Saline-soaked sponges electrodes will be placed on the cerebellar vermis (anodal electrode) and over the right buccinator muscle (reference electrode). Stimulation intensity will be set at 1.5 mA. The intensity of the stimulation will be gradually increase in order to reach the 1.5 mA with a ramping-up phase of 15 sec. Similarly, a ramping-down phase of 15 sec will gradually decrease the intensity before the end of the stimulation. The duration of the 1.5mA stimulation will be 20 minutes. Soon after the end of the stimulation, the virtual reality training will be performed. The virtual reality training will took place in a child-friendly scenario. It will comprise a total of 80 trials, during which participants will be asked to compete with some avatars in order to activate and to win some objects.
Sham Comparator: Sham-tDCS group
8 sessions (in two weeks) of sham tDCS combined with a virtual reality training
Sham -tDCS will be delivered over the cerebellum for 8 sessions in two weeks. tDCS will be delivered via a battery driven direct current stimulator. Saline-soaked sponges electrodes will be placed on the cerebellar vermis (anodal electrode) and over the right buccinator muscle (reference electrode). Stimulation intensity will be set at 1.5 mA but the current will be applied for 30 sec. The intensity of the stimulation will be gradually increase in order to reach the 1.5 mA with a ramping-up phase of 15 sec. Similarly, a ramping-down phase of 15 sec will gradually decrease the intensity before the end of the stimulation. The duration of the 0mA stimulation will be 20 minutes. Soon after the end of the stimulation, the virtual reality training will be performed. The virtual reality training will took place in a child-friendly scenario. It will comprise a total of 80 trials, during which participants will be asked to compete with some avatars in order to activate and to win some objects.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Social Prediction abilities in the Action Prediction task
Time Frame: Time 1- at the end the last training session vs Time 0- before starting the first training session
-Performance in the testing phase of the action prediction task, consisting in the accuracy in discriminating between two alternatives in order to predict the unfolding of an individual or interpersonal action as a function of different probability of co-occurence between the same action and a contextual cues, as previously learned during a familiarization phase.
Time 1- at the end the last training session vs Time 0- before starting the first training session
Change in Social Prediction abilities in the Virtual Reality scenario
Time Frame: Time 1- at the end the last training session vs Time 0- before starting the first training session
-Performance in the evaluation session in the Virtual Reality scenario, consisting in the percentage difference in the objects activated by the participants with respect to the objects activated by the avatars.
Time 1- at the end the last training session vs Time 0- before starting the first training session

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Non-social Prediction task abilities
Time Frame: Time 1- at the end the last training session vs Time 0- before starting the first training session
Performance in the testing phase of the shape prediction task, consisting in the accuracy in discriminating between two alternatives in order to predict the shape of a moving object as a function of different probability of co-occurence between the same shape and a contextual cues, as previously learned during a familiarization phase.
Time 1- at the end the last training session vs Time 0- before starting the first training session
Change in Social Cognition
Time Frame: Time 2- up to one month after the end of the intervention vs Time 0- before starting the first training session
Theory of Mind Parts A and B and Emotion Recognition of the NEPSY-II testing battery (Scaled scores ranging 1 to 19, mean=10, standard deviation=3, with higher scores meaning better performance).
Time 2- up to one month after the end of the intervention vs Time 0- before starting the first training session
Change in Quality of life assessment: TNO-AZL Questionnaires for Children's Health-Related Quality of Life (TACQOL) questionnaire
Time Frame: Time 2- up to one month after the end of the intervention vs Time 0- before starting the first training session

Overall functioning and quality of life assessed using the TNO-AZL Questionnaires for Children's Health-Related Quality of Life (TACQOL), presented in two forms: the self-compiled one and the parent compiled one. The questionnaire comprises 8 different subscales referring to problems/limitations in general physical functioning (Body subscale);.in motor functioning (Motor subscales); in independent daily functioning (Auto subscale); in cognitive functioning and school performance (cognit subscale); in social contacts with parents and peers (Social scale); to the occurrence of positive moods (Empos subscale) or negative moods (Emoneg scale). The sum scores may range from 0 to 32 for Body, Motor, Cognit, Auto and Social scales. For Empos and Emoneg the scores vary between 0 and 16.

The calculated scale scores are all in the same direction: a low score indicates a lower Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL); a high score indicates a higher HRQoL.

Time 2- up to one month after the end of the intervention vs Time 0- before starting the first training session
training feasibility assessment: Evaluation of the number of dropouts
Time Frame: Time 1- at the end the last training session
Evaluation of the number of dropouts: number of patient who renounce to complete the whole training Evaluation of the number of sessions completed per patient: total number of sessions performed in front of the total number proposed of eight sessions
Time 1- at the end the last training session
training acceptability assessment: Ad-hoc questionnaire
Time Frame: Time 1- at the end the last training session
Ad-hoc questionnaire completed by participants and by their parents to assess subjective evaluation of training accessibility and efficacy (10 cm Visual Analogue scales with higher values corresponding to greater agreement).
Time 1- at the end the last training session

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

April 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 15, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 24, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 5, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 5, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ataxia, Cerebellar

Clinical Trials on Active-tDCS group

3
Subscribe