The MOTIVE-PSP Initiative (Progressive Supranuclear Palsy)

January 27, 2022 updated by: Marina Picillo, University of Salerno

MotOr, cogniTIVe and Imaging charactErization of Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Phenotypes: a Longitudinal Prospective Study Looking for Biomarkers

Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP) is a rapidly progressive neurodegenerative disease characterized by falls and oculomotor disturbances. Several clinical trials are currently evaluating the efficacy of new pharmacological compounds in slowing disease progression. Yet, both early diagnosis and evaluation of disease progression remain challenging.

Study aims include verifying if specific motor, cognitive, language, cerebrospinal fluid and imaging assessments represent reliable biomarkers of PSP diagnosis, phenotypization and progression over 1-year follow up. Motor evaluation will include recordings from wearable sensors.

Expected results include 1) improvement of PSP diagnosis and phenotypization; 2)improvement of evaluation of disease progression in the context of clinical trial; 3)enhancement of strategies to prevent falls and fractures in such patients leading, in turn, to significant cost savings for the National Health System.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

Hyphotesis and Significance:

1)Cross-sectional phase:verify if specific motor, cognitive, language, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and imaging assessments represent reliable biomarkers of diagnosis in PSP in the earliest stages of disease compared to Parkinson's disease (PD) and healthy controls (HC) and are able characterize the different PSP clinical phenotype 2)12-month longitudinal phase:verify if specific motor, cognitive, language, CSF and imaging assessments represent reliable biomarkers of disease progression also according to the clinical phenotype

Preliminary Data:

Cross-sectional data suggest that current motor, cognitive, language and imaging assessments may be useful in supporting the diagnosis of PSP compared to PD and HC, but not in characterizing the PSP clinical phenotypes. No robust data on wearable sensors and CSF biomarkers is available.

Longitudinal data on such biomarkers are lacking. As for cognition, preliminary data suggest that the Repeatable Battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status (RBANS) may evaluate cognitive trajectories in PSP with Richardson's syndrome.

Specific Aim 1:

Determine the feasibility, validity and reliability of application of digital biomarkers in PSP. Specifically if clinic-based wearable sensors and smartphone-based remote assessments can (1) support early clinical diagnosis and phenotyping of PSP patients compared to PD and HC and (2) evaluate disease trajectories in the whole cohort of PSP patients and discrete phenotypes compared to standard rating scales.

For both points the hypothesis is that both clinic-based and smartphone-based wearable sensors outperform standard rating scales.

Specific aim 2:

Verify if cognitive, language and behavioral testing can (1) support early clinical diagnosis and phenotyping of PSP patients compared to PD and HC and (2) evaluate disease trajectories in the whole cohort of PSP patients and discrete phenotypes.

For point (1) the hypothesis is that cognitive, language and behavioral testing support early diagnosis and phenotyping in the earliest stages compared to PD and HC. For point (2) the hypothesis is that cognitive, language and behavioral testing are able to evaluate disease progression in the whole cohort of PSP patients and discrete phenotypes.

Specific aim 3:

Verify if single parameter and multiparameter magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging assessments can (1) support early clinical diagnosis and phenotyping of PSP patients compared to PD and HC and (2) evaluate disease trajectories in the whole cohort of PSP patients and discrete phenotypes.

Experimental design aim 1 includes a cross-sectional phase with enrollment of 3 groups of subjects (PSP, PD and HC).

During the baseline evaluation each enrolled subject will perform:1) a clinic-based standardized protocol for assessment of gait with wearable inertial sensors to specifically monitor quality of gait and balance using a wide range of measures from the upper and lower body (APDM Mobility Lab system) ;2) home-based monitoring with smartphone of inertial measurement (balance and gait task) and voice recorded with microphone for at least 5 days;3) standard clinical rating scales including the PSP rating scale, the Natural History and Neuroprotection in Parkinson Plus Syndromes, Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's disease rating scale part III, Falls diary to be filled during the 5-day home based monitoring. Caregivers will be asked to actively support patients for the home- smartphone-based digital biomarkers measurements.

Furthermore, at baseline only PSP patients will be asked to perform lumbar puncture to collect CSF and measure total-tau, phosphorylated tau, Beta-amyloid 42, neurofilament light and heavy chain. A 12-month longitudinal phase will follow only for PSP patients.

During both cross-sectional and longitudinal phases (every 3 months), only patients enrolled at Unit 1 will also perform a gait analysis assessment with a traditional opto-kinematic, hospital-based gait analysis system (Qualisys®, Sandvälen, Sweden).

Experimental design aim 2 includes a cross-sectional phase with enrollment of 3 groups of subjects (PSP, PD and HC).

During the baseline evaluation each enrolled subject will perform:1) the RBANS; 2)standard cognitive assessment currently used by part of the research team to evaluate cognitive abilities in PSP patients as detailed elsewhere; 3) functional autonomy will be evaluated with the Instrumental Activities of Daily Life, while depression and apathy with the Beck Depression Inventory II and Apathy Evaluation Scale, respectively; 4) other neuropsychiatric symptoms will be explored with the Neuropsychiatric Inventory; 5) language abilities will be explored with the Screening for Aphasia in NeuroDegeneration (SAND) battery.

A 12-month longitudinal phase will follow only for PSP patients.

Experimental design aim 3 includes a cross-sectional phase with enrollment of 3 groups of subjects (PSP, PD and HC).

During the baseline evaluation each enrolled subject will undergo a multimodal 3T MRI. The MRI protocol will include conventional sequences for morphometric measures (ie, the superior cerebellar peduncles, the middle cerebellar peduncles, the MR Parkinsonism index, the midbrain-pons area ratio; a 3D Spoiled Gradient Recalled Echo (SPGR) and a 3D-GRE multi-echo susceptibility weighted (SWAN) images to obtain quantitative susceptibility mapping and ROI based measures in substantia nigra, basal ganglia thalamus, red nucleus and fronto-parietal cortex, a resting state functional MRI and an Arterial Spin Labeling sequence.

A 12-month longitudinal phase will follow only for PSP patients. Both single parameter and multiparameter (morphometric, iron based, functional, and perfusion) MRI approaches will be applied to validate the usefulness of imaging assessments in predicting both early PSP diagnosis and phenotyping as well as disease progression.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

165

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with Progressive Supranuclera palsy. Any phenotype of the disease will be included

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of Progressive Supranuclear Palsy based on current available clinical criteria
  • ability to walk for at least 5 steps

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Comorbidities interfering with study assessments
  • Significant MRI abnormalities as cerebrovascular diseases, tumors.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Group 3
Healthy controls
evaluation of movements with sensors
Group 1
Patients with Progressive Supranuclear Palsy
evaluation of movements with sensors
Group 2
Patients with Parkinson's disease
evaluation of movements with sensors

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progressive Supranuclear Palsy rating scale
Time Frame: 1-year follow up
Progression of disease as assessed with the standard clinical scale rating (scoring 0-100, higher scores indicate worse scores) Progressive Supranuclear Palsy symptoms and signs
1-year follow up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cognitive progression
Time Frame: 1-year follow up
Evaluated with the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) scale score (scoring 0-100, higher scores indicate better scores)
1-year follow up
Behavioral progression
Time Frame: 1-year follow up
Behavioral symptoms as assessed with Neuropsychiatric Inventory scale (scoring 0-144, higher scores indicate worse scores)
1-year follow up
MRI
Time Frame: 1-year follow up
Progression of disease as assessed with MRI specific measures (the superior cerebellar peduncles, the middle cerebellar peduncles, the MR Parkinsonism index, the midbrain-pons area ratio; a 3D Spoiled Gradient Recalled Echo (SPGR) and a 3D-GRE multi-echo susceptibility weighted)
1-year follow up
Gait speed
Time Frame: 1-year follow up
Gait speed as assessed with motion sensors
1-year follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2025

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 28, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 28, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 31, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 11, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 27, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

No IPD will be shared with external researchers

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Progressive Supranuclear Palsy

Clinical Trials on evaluation of movements with sensors

3
Subscribe