Assistive Soft Robotic Glove (EsoGLOVE) Intervention for Stroke Patients

August 8, 2022 updated by: National University Hospital, Singapore

Stroke remains the 4th cause of death in Singapore and despite advances in medical care and rehabilitation, 40-50% of stroke survivors are left with permanent disability and reduced quality of life. Hand motor impairment is a very serious complication to every stroke survivor. These impairments include difficulty moving and coordinating the hands and fingers, which inhibits stroke patients from being able to perform daily functional tasks independently, resulting in a reduced quality of life.

More than half of people with upper limb impairment after stroke will still have problems many months to years after their stroke. Therefore, improving hand function is a core element of rehabilitation where the aim is to recover and recruit the damaged neurons in the brain as soon as possible, within 3-6 months of the stroke as it thought to be the golden recovery period.

In the hospital setting, every stroke patient will receive about 30 minutes to 1 hour of occupational therapy (OT) for functional training, including hand functional exercises. However, manpower constraints limited stroke patients to one OT session per day but they are encouraged to continuously practice on their own, which may cause patients to encounter difficulties without guidance and hence less motivated to perform.

This proposed research aims to assess the efficacy and feasibility of the EsoGLOVE with Trigno Biofeedback (EMG sensors) in the inpatient rehabilitation setting through:

  1. Understanding the ability of the EsoGLOVE with Trigno Biofeedback (EMG sensors) in providing CPM exercise and assisting stroke patients with completing hand functional tasks, eventually improves patients' motor function and neural recovery.
  2. To generate evidence on this innovative device and further deploy it in clinical practice. A Health Technology Assessment (HTA) will be generated from this study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the intervention.

The investigators hypothesize that EsoGLOVE with Trigno Biofeedback (EMG sensors) combined with hand rehabilitation will add additional benefits to stroke patients. It might have better hand functional outcomes than hand rehabilitation alone as it can allow the patients to conduct functional task training in both passive and active modes.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Stroke remains the 4th cause of death in Singapore and despite advances in medical care and rehabilitation, 40-50% of stroke survivors are left with permanent disability and reduced quality of life. Given a global aging population and growing manpower constraints, the therapists-to-patients ratio will likely be inadequate. In the local context, Singapore is moving towards an aging population, where the number of elderly is expected to triple to 900,000 by 2030 with a decreasing old-age support ratio and is likely to be associated with increased risk of stroke and related motor disabilities.

Hand motor impairment is a very serious complication to every stroke survivor. These impairments include difficulty moving and coordinating the hands and fingers, which inhibits stroke patients from being able to perform daily functional tasks independently, resulting in a reduced quality of life. More than half of people with upper limb impairment after stroke will still have problems many months to years after their stroke. Therefore, improving hand function is a core element of rehabilitation.

Early rehabilitation is very essential to acute stroke patients. Most of the patients receive early rehabilitation in acute hospital and community hospital after suffering the stroke. The aim is to recover and recruit the damaged neurons in the brain as soon as possible. People believe that patients should start intensive rehabilitation within 3-6 months as the golden recovery period. In the hospital setting, every stroke patient will receive occupational therapy for functional training, including hand functional exercises. One therapy session is about 30 minutes to 1 hour. Due to manpower constraints, stroke patients may receive one session per day only. Patients may rest in the ward or the bed whole day after the therapy session. Bed exercises may be provided by therapists and encouraging patients to continuously practice while resting in the bed, however, patients may feel difficult without guidance and low motivation to perform. Hence this research is important for:

  1. Assessing the efficacy of the EsoGLOVE with Trigno Biofeedback (EMG sensors) for acute and subacute stroke patients in the inpatient rehabilitation setting.
  2. Investigating the efficacy of the EsoGLOVE with Trigno Biofeedback (EMG sensors): To achieve a minimum of 6 FMA scores difference/change between treatments and pre amp; post-intervention (3rd -0th week).
  3. Understanding the ability and clinical outcome of the EsoGLOVE with Trigno Biofeedback (EMG sensors) in providing CPM exercise and assisting stroke patients with completing hand functional tasks, eventually improve patients' motor function and neural recovery.
  4. Generating evidence on this innovative device and further deploy it in clinical practice. A Health Technology Assessment (HTA) will be generated from this study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the intervention.

This proposed research aims to assess the efficacy and feasibility of the EsoGLOVE with Trigno Biofeedback (EMG sensors) in the inpatient rehabilitation setting through:

  1. Understanding the ability of the EsoGLOVE with Trigno Biofeedback (EMG sensors) in providing CPM exercise and assisting stroke patients with completing hand functional tasks, eventually improves patients' motor function and neural recovery.
  2. To generate evidence on this innovative device and further deploy it in clinical practice. A Health Technology Assessment (HTA) will be generated from this study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the intervention.

The investigators hypothesize that EsoGLOVE with Trigno Biofeedback (EMG sensors) combined with hand rehabilitation will add additional benefits to stroke patients. It might have better hand functional outcomes than hand rehabilitation alone as it can allow the patients to conduct functional task training in both passive and active modes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

130

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 30-90 years regardless of lesion size, race
  • Stroke type: ischemic or haemorrhagic
  • Medically stable conditions
  • Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) of upper extremity impairment of 10-56 out of 66.
  • Able to give own consent, comprehend and follow commands
  • Able to sit upright and maintain sitting balance for at least 30 minutes
  • Able to stay alert and focus on the tasks for at least 30 minutes and more.
  • Unilateral upper limb impairment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Recurrent stroke
  • Unstable medical conditions (e.g. heart attack, unstable blood pressure, infection, and etc.) or anticipated life expectancy of <1 year.
  • Cognitive and communicative impairment (e.g. severe aphasia, inattention, learning difficulty, and etc).
  • History of severe depression or active psychiatric disorder.
  • Severe spasticity (Modified Ashworth scale =2), joint contractures or deformity, poor skin conditions (e.g. irritated skin, open wounds), amputation of fingers, and allergic condition (e.g. patients with allergies to adhesive gel).
  • Poor trunk control or postural hypotension.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: EsoGLOVE with Trigno Biofeedback (EMG sensors) group
The subjects will receive the intervention (EsoGLOVE with Trigno Biofeedback (EMG sensors) treatment with Trigno Biofeedback (EMG sensors) on therapy day (Monday to Friday) for 3 weeks, a minimum of 30 minutes per day, in addition to intensive stroke rehabilitation as per normal, which will be daily physiotherapy and occupational therapy as a part of standard care as per stroke rehabilitation.
The EsoGLOVE + Trigno subjects will receive EsoGLOVE with Trigno Biofeedback (EMG sensors) training on therapy day for 3 weeks (week 1 to week 3, sessions will be done every Monday to Friday), a minimum of 30 minutes per day in additional to the physiotherapy and occupational therapy as standard care for stroke patients.
Active Comparator: GRASP group
Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program (GRASP) following the GRASP protocolwhile wearing a neoprene wrist support) on therapy day (Monday to Friday) for 3 weeks, a minimum of 30 minutes per day, in addition to intensive stroke rehabilitation as per normal, which will be daily physiotherapy and occupational therapy as a part of standard care as per stroke rehabilitation.
The EsoGLOVE + Trigno subjects will receive EsoGLOVE with Trigno Biofeedback (EMG sensors) training on therapy day for 3 weeks (week 1 to week 3, sessions will be done every Monday to Friday), a minimum of 30 minutes per day in additional to the physiotherapy and occupational therapy as standard care for stroke patients.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Scale (FML-UE)
Time Frame: Baseline assessment
The Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity (FMUE) is a 33 item scale used for assessing reflex activity, movement control and muscle strength in the upper extremity of people with post-stroke hemiplegia. Each item is scored from 0 to 2, where 0 = cannot perform, 1 = performs partially and2 = performs fully. Total scores for all items ranges form 0 to 66, where higher scores indicates better functioning of the upper limb and lower scores indicates decreased function in the affected upper limb. The FML-UE scale is administered at different time points to track patients' improvements of the affected upper limb in stroke patients.
Baseline assessment
Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Scale (FML-UE)
Time Frame: Post-intervention assessment at day 15.
The Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity (FMUE) is a 33 item scale used for assessing reflex activity, movement control and muscle strength in the upper extremity of people with post-stroke hemiplegia. Each item is scored from 0 to 2, where 0 = cannot perform, 1 = performs partially and2 = performs fully. Total scores for all items ranges form 0 to 66, where higher scores indicates better functioning of the upper limb and lower scores indicates decreased function in the affected upper limb. The FML-UE scale is administered at different time points to track patients' improvements of the affected upper limb in stroke patients.
Post-intervention assessment at day 15.
Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Scale (FML-UE)
Time Frame: Post-intervention assessment at 3 month follow up visit
The Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity (FMUE) is a 33 item scale used for assessing reflex activity, movement control and muscle strength in the upper extremity of people with post-stroke hemiplegia. Each item is scored from 0 to 2, where 0 = cannot perform, 1 = performs partially and2 = performs fully. Total scores for all items ranges form 0 to 66, where higher scores indicates better functioning of the upper limb and lower scores indicates decreased function in the affected upper limb. The FML-UE scale is administered at different time points to track patients' improvements of the affected upper limb in stroke patients.
Post-intervention assessment at 3 month follow up visit
Stroke Impact Scale (SIS)
Time Frame: Baseline assessment
The Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) is a 59 item, self-reporting questionnaire for assessing disability and health-related quality of life (QoL) after stroke in 8 domains, namely: 1. Strength, 2. Hand function, 3. Activities of daily living (ADL/IADL), 4. Mobility, 5. Communication, 6. Emotion, 7. Memory and thinking, 8. Participation/Role function. The individual items are total scores to give a range of 0 to 100, where higher scores indicates better functioning.
Baseline assessment
Stroke Impact Scale (SIS)
Time Frame: Post-intervention assessment at 21 days
The Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) is a 59 item, self-reporting questionnaire for assessing disability and health-related quality of life (QoL) after stroke in 8 domains, namely: 1. Strength, 2. Hand function, 3. Activities of daily living (ADL/IADL), 4. Mobility, 5. Communication, 6. Emotion, 7. Memory and thinking, 8. Participation/Role function. The individual items are total scores to give a range of 0 to 100, where higher scores indicates better functioning.
Post-intervention assessment at 21 days
Stroke Impact Scale (SIS)
Time Frame: Post-intervention assessment at 3 months follow-up
The Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) is a 59 item, self-reporting questionnaire for assessing disability and health-related quality of life (QoL) after stroke in 8 domains, namely: 1. Strength, 2. Hand function, 3. Activities of daily living (ADL/IADL), 4. Mobility, 5. Communication, 6. Emotion, 7. Memory and thinking, 8. Participation/Role function. The individual items are total scores to give a range of 0 to 100, where higher scores indicates better functioning and is administered at different time points to track improvements in patients.
Post-intervention assessment at 3 months follow-up
Duruoz Hand Index
Time Frame: Baseline assessment
The Duruoz Hand Index is a 18-item self-reporting questionnaire for evaluating activity limitations of the hand in terms of level of difficulties in carrying out manual tasks independently in 5 domains, namely: 1. in the kitchen, 2. dressing, 3. hygiene, 4. in the, office and 5. Other. Each item is rated on a 6 point Likert scale, where 0 = without difficulty and 5 = impossible. All the responses are totaled score of between 0 to 90 where higher scores represents poorer functioning of the affected hand. The Duroz Hand Index is administered at different time points to track improvements in the patient's level of functioning.
Baseline assessment
Duruoz Hand Index
Time Frame: Post-intervention assessment at 21 days
The Duruoz Hand Index is a 18-item self-reporting questionnaire for evaluating activity limitations of the hand in terms of level of difficulties in carrying out manual tasks independently in 5 domains, namely: 1. in the kitchen, 2. dressing, 3. hygiene, 4. in the, office and 5. Other. Each item is rated on a 6 point Likert scale, where 0 = without difficulty and 5 = impossible. All the responses are totaled score of between 0 to 90 where higher scores represents poorer functioning of the affected hand. The Duroz Hand Index is administered at different time points to track improvements in the patient's level of functioning.
Post-intervention assessment at 21 days
Duruoz Hand Index
Time Frame: Post-intervention assessment 3 months follow up
The Duruoz Hand Index is a 18-item self-reporting questionnaire for evaluating activity limitations of the hand in terms of level of difficulties in carrying out manual tasks independently in 5 domains, namely: 1. in the kitchen, 2. dressing, 3. hygiene, 4. in the, office and 5. Other. Each item is rated on a 6 point Likert scale, where 0 = without difficulty and 5 = impossible. All the responses are totaled score of between 0 to 90 where higher scores represents poorer functioning of the affected hand. The Duroz Hand Index is administered at different time points to track improvements in the patient's level of functioning.
Post-intervention assessment 3 months follow up
Stroke Upper Limb Capacity Scale (SULCS)
Time Frame: Baseline assessment
The SULCS consists of 10 tasks that relate to daily activities.1,3 Each receives a score of 0 (unable to perform) or 1 (able to perform), resulting in a total score of 0-10 where higher scores indicates better functioning of the stroke-affected upper limb. This scale is administered at different time points to assess the improvements in upper limb affected by stroke.
Baseline assessment
Stroke Upper Limb Capacity Scale (SULCS)
Time Frame: Post-intervention assessment at 21 days follow up
The SULCS consists of 10 tasks that relate to daily activities.1,3 Each receives a score of 0 (unable to perform) or 1 (able to perform), resulting in a total score of 0-10 where higher scores indicates better functioning of the stroke-affected upper limb. This scale is administered at different time points to assess the improvements in upper limb affected by stroke.
Post-intervention assessment at 21 days follow up
Stroke Upper Limb Capacity Scale (SULCS)
Time Frame: Post-intervention assessment at 3 months follow up
The SULCS consists of 10 tasks that relate to daily activities.1,3 Each receives a score of 0 (unable to perform) or 1 (able to perform), resulting in a total score of 0-10 where higher scores indicates better functioning of the stroke-affected upper limb. This scale is administered at different time points to assess the improvements in upper limb affected by stroke.
Post-intervention assessment at 3 months follow up
Out-of-Pocket Spending Questionnaire
Time Frame: Post-intervention assessment at 3 month follow up visit only
Out-of-Pocket Spending is defined as direct payments made by individuals to health care providers at the time of service use. The Out-of-Pocket Spending Questionnaire will record out-of-pocket spending the patient has made from Week 3 to 12.
Post-intervention assessment at 3 month follow up visit only

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pui Kit Tam, MD, National University Hospital, Singapore

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

August 15, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 29, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 29, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 8, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

August 10, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 10, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2022

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on EsoGLOVE with Trigno Biofeedback (EMG sensors)

3
Subscribe