Pneumatic Retinopexy for Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: To Steamroll or Not

April 11, 2023 updated by: Dr. Kenneth Eng, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
This is a randomized controlled trial comparing displacement of macula and the rapidity of reattachment of macula between two different positioning techniques after pneumatic retinopexy : Direct technique (patient is positioned so that the bubble is immediately placed directly over the retina break) and Steamroller technique (patient is initially positioned face down for 4-6 hours and subsequently changes their head position so that the bubble is then placed directly over the retina break).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Pneumatic retinopexy (PR) is an established treatment for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). In our centre, PR is the most commonly performed procedure for primary RRD repair with a high retinal reattachment success rate. In this procedure, patients are required to position according to the site of pathology following injection of an intravitreal gas bubble. Some practitioners position the patient so that the gas bubble is immediately apposed directly against the retinal break (direct technique). Others favour the steamroller technique whereby the patient is initially positioned face down, then after 4-6 hours, the position is changed sequentially so that the bubble is rolled over the retina towards the break responsible for the detachment (steamroller technique). Variable visual acuity (VA) outcomes and metamorphopsia are common post-procedure complaints despite successful RRD repair with PR. It has been suggested that variability in functional outcomes may be associated with the timing and ease of reattachment of macula. The purpose of this prospective study is to evaluate whether the steamroller technique is superior to the direct technique in faster reattachment of macula with less macula displacement.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4N 3M5
        • Recruiting
        • SunnyBrook Health Sciences Centre
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Kenneth Eng, MD FRCSC
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Peter Kertes, MD FRCSC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Primary RRD
  • Causative breaks over superior 8 clock hours
  • Single break or group of breaks
  • No or min proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) (Grade A or B)
  • Other breaks or lattice in attached retina are allowed

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Retinal break in the inferior 4 clock hours in detached retina
  • PVR Grade C or worse
  • Significant media opacity (Vitreous hemorrhage, dense cataract, cornea scar, etc)
  • Pre-existing ocular pathology [macula hole (MH), epiretinal membrane (ERM), cystoid macula edema (CME), age-related macula degeneration, myopic degeneration, advanced glaucoma, uveitis, amblyopia etc] or previous eye trauma with poor baseline vision
  • Previous pars plana vitrectomy
  • Age ≤18years old
  • Inadequate physical or mental competence to maintain the required postoperative head position

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Steamroller Technique
Following intravitreal gas injection, patient positioned face down for 4-6 hours and subsequently patient changes the position of the head so that the bubble is then placed directly over the retina break.
Following intravitreal gas injection, patient positioned face down for 4-6 hours and subsequently patient changes the position of the head so that the bubble is then placed directly over the retina break.
Active Comparator: Direct Technique
Following intravitreal gas injection, patient is immediately positioned so that the bubble is placed directly over the retina break.
Following intravitreal gas injection, patient is immediately positioned so that the bubble is placed directly over the retina break.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Macular status at Day 1
Time Frame: 24hours post intervention
Assessment of macular status by optical coherence tomography at 24 hours after intervention to see which technique is most effective for reattaching the macula
24hours post intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anatomical displacement of macula and its changes with time.
Time Frame: 1,2, 3 and 6 months post intervention
Measurement of retinal vessel imprinting on fundus autofluorescence
1,2, 3 and 6 months post intervention
Functional displacement of macula and its changes with time.
Time Frame: 1,2, 3 and 6 months post intervention
Measurement of metamorphopsia with M-charts
1,2, 3 and 6 months post intervention
Macular Status
Time Frame: 1hour, 2hours, Day 2, Week 1, Week 2
Looking at macula status via optical coherence tomography after intervention to see which technique is more effective in reattaching the macula early
1hour, 2hours, Day 2, Week 1, Week 2
Visual acuity
Time Frame: 1, 3 and 6 months post intervention
ETDRS
1, 3 and 6 months post intervention
Primary anatomical success
Time Frame: 1, 3 and 6 months post intervention
Complete reattachment of retina via clinical fundus examination and optos fundus photography
1, 3 and 6 months post intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kenneth Eng, MD FRCSC, SunnyBrook Health Sciences Centre

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 7, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 7, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 7, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 19, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 22, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

January 25, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment

Clinical Trials on Steamroller technique

3
Subscribe