AQUA: Anticholinergic Side Effects QUestionnAire (AQUA)

February 17, 2022 updated by: Gérard Amarenco, Pierre and Marie Curie University

AQUA: A NEW QUESTIONNAIRE ASSESSING ANTICHOLINERGIC SIDE EFFECTS IN NEUROGENIC POPULATION (AQUA: Anticholinergic Side Effects QUestionnAire)

Overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) is very frequent and increase with age. Antimuscarinics allows improvement for OAB symptoms, quality of life and urodynamic parameters. However, antimuscarinics adherence is poor and anticholinergic drugs are often withdrawn few months after their introduction. This low adherence to antimuscarinics can be explained by side effects as dry mouth, blurred vision, constipation or cognitive impairment which are due to systemic anticholinergic effects since specificity and receptor affinity of bladder antimuscarinics are poor with a large distribution of acetylcholine receptors in all the body. Unfortunately, there is no questionnaires which evaluate side effects or constraints. The objective of the study is to develop and validate a new questionnaire to assess side effects of antimuscarinic treatment in a patient with OAB.

The study was conducted in a Neuro-urology Department of a University Hospital. To allow a full psychometric validation of the questionnaire, the study protocol included 3 steps: qualitative interviews, feasibility study and validation study. The inclusion criteria were to be aged > 18 years and to have OAB symptoms according to the ICS definition and secondary to a neurogenic dysfunction.

First step of the study consisted in a review literature on Pubmed to explore the different side effects secondary to antimuscarinic treatment and do determine which tools were available. In addition, we conducted semi-structured interviews on 30 patients suffering from OAB.

For this feasibility study, 30 patients were included. They had to rate each item to evaluate comprehension, acceptation and pertinence with a three-points Likert scale from response "0: not at all or quite" to "2: perfectly".

Validation study: 100 patients Content validity was assessed by the panel of experts. Internal consistency reliability was calculated using the α coefficient of Cronbach. Each response has been transformed in a numeric value to perform this test. Alpha coefficient of Cronbach was considered as very good if > 0.7.

Test-retest reliability was tested using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) which was significant over 0.7.

Objective was to validate this questionnaire with good or very good psychometric properties. Primary outcome was Alpha coefficient of Cronbach and ICC ≥ 0,7.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Lower Urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are widespread in the general population and their prevalence is expected to increase in the coming years as the elderly population increases. Indeed, overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) is very frequent and increase with age. OAB has numerous and various etiologies and can be caused by urologic, metabolic, neurogenic or autonomic dysfunction. Treatments for OAB depends on etiology but first line treatment often corresponds to lifestyle modification and antimuscarinics. Antimuscarinics allows improvement for OAB symptoms, quality of life and urodynamic parameters. However, antimuscarinics adherence is poor and anticholinergic drugs are often withdrawn few months after their introduction. This low adherence to antimuscarinics can be explained by side effects as dry mouth, blurred vision, constipation or cognitive impairment which are due to systemic anticholinergic effects since specificity and receptor affinity of bladder antimuscarinics are poor with a large distribution of acetylcholine receptors in all the body. Unfortunately, there is no or a few questionnaires which evaluate side effects or constraints, except for one published in 2019, but not specific for anticholinergics. This part of evaluation is poorly reported in medical literature, whereas it seems to be clear that side effects should be systematically evaluate and are in part responsible of treatment discontinuation. The objective of the study is to develop and validate a new questionnaire to assess side effects of antimuscarinic treatment in a patient with OAB.

The study was conducted in a Neuro-urology Department of a University Hospital. To allow a full psychometric validation of the questionnaire, the study protocol included 3 steps: qualitative interviews, feasibility study and validation study. The inclusion criteria were to be aged > 18 years and to have OAB symptoms according to the ICS definition and secondary to a neurogenic dysfunction.

First step of the study consisted in a review literature on Pubmed to explore the different side effects secondary to antimuscarinic treatment and do determine which tools were available. In addition, we conducted semi-structured interviews on 30 patients suffering from OAB.

Feasibility Study For this feasibility study, 30 patients were included. They had to rate each item to evaluate comprehension, acceptation and pertinence with a three-points Likert scale from response "0: not at all or quite" to "2: perfectly".

Validation study: 100 patients Content validity was assessed by the panel of experts. Internal consistency reliability was calculated using the α coefficient of Cronbach. Each response has been transformed in a numeric value to perform this test. Alpha coefficient of Cronbach was considered as very good if > 0.7.

Test-retest reliability was tested using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) which was significant over 0.7. The first questionnaire was filled at the end of the first consultation and patients had to answer a second questionnaire (filled at home) 7 days after the first consultation.

Objective was to validate this questionnaire with good or very good psychometric properties. Primary outcome was Alpha coefficient of Cronbach and ICC ≥ 0,7.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 70020
        • department of Neuro-Urology, Hôpital Tenon

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patient suffering from OAB symptoms secondary to neurogenic condition and treated by antimuscarinic treatment.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • OAB symptoms according to ICS definition
  • neurogenic bladder
  • antimuscarinic treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Treatment change between first evaluation and second evaluation (Test retest validity)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
reproductibilty of Anticholinergic side effects QuestionnAire (AQUA)
Time Frame: 1 day
Patients were asked to answer a second time the questionnaire with a second evaluation at 14 days after the first one. The "intra-class correlation coefficient" (ICC) was used to detemrine if this evaluaiton could lead to similar result for each quesiton. An ICC>0.70 was necessary to define reproductibility.
1 day
Acceptatbility of AQUA
Time Frame: 1 day
Each patient was asked to rate acceptatibilty of the questionnaire with a four-point liket scale (A: perfect, B : good, C: Average, D: bad) regarding acceptance of the questions
1 day
Comprehension of AQUA
Time Frame: 1 day
Each patient was asked to rate comprehension of the questionnaire with a four-point liket scale (A: perfect, B : good, C: Average, D: bad) regarding comprehension of the questions
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gérard AMARENCO, MD, PhD, Sorbonne University, GRC 001, GREEN, APHP, Hopital Tenon, France

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 5, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

March 10, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 4, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Overactive Bladder

Clinical Trials on Questionnaire

3
Subscribe