Endoscopic Injection of Dextranomer/Hyaluronic Acid Versus Ureteral Reimplantation In Treatment of Vesicoureteral Reflux

March 12, 2021 updated by: Elsayed Salih

Comparison of Subureteral Endoscopic Injection of Dextranomer/Hyaluronic Acid and Lich-Gregoir Ureteral Reimplantation In the Treatment of Pediatric Primary Vesicoureteral Reflux: Prospective Randomized Study

In this study, the investigators aim to compare the outcomes of Dextranomer/hyaluronic acid (Dexell®) and extravesical reimplantation (Lich- Gregoir) procedures for primary vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) grades III and IV in children.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A total of 60 patients with 93 renal unites were prospectively enrolled in a comparative intervention study. Patients were randomly allocated by simple randomization at a 1: 1 ratio into 2 groups, where dextranomer/hyaluronic acid (Dexell) injection was used in Group A (30 patients with 45 renal units) and Lich-Gregoir in Group B (30 patients with 48 renal units).

Children over 1 year with primary VUR grade III & IV based on recent VCUG included in the study.

This study and method of attaining consent were approved by clinical research and ethical committee of our department. Written consents were taken from patients' guardians involved in the study. the investigators offered all of patients with symptomatic VUR entry into a prospective protocol between June 2015 and February 2018 at the Urology Department, Al Hussein University Hospital, Al-Azhar University.

Surgical Technique:

  1. dextranomer/hyaluronic acid injection: The endoscopic procedure was done under general anesthesia, and all patients received antibiotic prophylaxis. the investigators used the subureteral injection technique (STING), as described by O'Donnell and Puri . The volume of dextranomer/hyaluronic acid was injected until ureteral orifice collapse in all patients. The needle was held for 30 s.
  2. ureteral reimplantation (lich-gregoir): The juxtavesical ureter is dissected and a submucosal groove is created extending laterally from the ureteral hiatus along the course of the ureter. The ureter is placed in the groove and the detrusor is closed over the ureter with ureteric stent fixation for 21 days. Urethral catheter for bladder drainage for 3-5 days.

Postoperative Care All children were maintained on prophylaxis until resolution of reflux documented on the VCUG. Patients were assessed by general examination, serial urinalysis and urine C.S. renal ultrasound at 1,3 months and at 1 year after the procedure and a VCUG at 3-6 months. MRU at 1 year. DMSA scintigraphy were done at 6 months after the procedure. the investigators analyzed the outcome in these 2 surgical groups in terms of success rate at short-term follow-up, contralateral reflux, de novo hydronephrosis, urinary tract infections and complications.

The investigators considered that a patient was cured from reflux when there was no VUR on VCUG.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year to 16 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Children over one year with primary Vesico-Ureteral reflux grade III and IV.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Secondary Vesico-Ureteral reflux.
  • Active urinary tract infection
  • Untreated voiding dysfunction.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Subureteral endoscopic injection
The endoscopic procedure was done under general anesthesia, and all patients received antibiotic prophylaxis. We used the subureteral injection technique (STING), as described by O'Donnell and Puri (1984). The volume of Dx/HA was injected until ureteral orifice collapse in all patients. The needle was held for 30 s.
The subureteral endoscopic injection was done under general anesthesia. the investigators used the subureteral injection technique (STING), as described by O'Donnell and Puri. The volume of Dexell was injected until ureteral orifice collapse in all patients. The needle was held for 30 s.
Other Names:
  • Dexell subureteral injection
Active Comparator: open ureteral reimplantation (lich-gregoir)
extravesical ureteral reimplantation (lich-gregoir) by open surgery
The juxtavesical ureter is dissected by open surgery and a submucosal groove is created extending laterally from the ureteral hiatus along the course of the ureter. The ureter is placed in the groove and the detrusor is closed over the ureter with ureteric stent fixation for 21 days. the surgical wound is closed in layers. Urethral catheter for bladder drainage for 3-5 days.
Other Names:
  • extra-vesical (Lich-Gregoir) ureteroneocystostomy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
surgical success
Time Frame: 2 years
The outcomes between both groups were analyzed according to surgical success rate. The child was considered to have been cured when there was no reflux on VCUG.
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
complications
Time Frame: 2 years
contralateral reflux, de novo hydronephrosis, urinary tract infections and other complications.
2 years
median costs
Time Frame: 2 years
median costs in US dollars compared between two groups
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: hussein galal, MD, professor of urology- department of urology- Al-Azhar faculty of medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 4, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 5, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

June 14, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 9, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

March 15, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 15, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

all IPD that underlie results in the publication including the Study Protocol Statistical Analysis Plan, Clinical Study Report, and Analytic Code.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

the data will be available 6 months after publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

the data will be shared with researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal to achieve aims in approved proposal. the mechanism of data availability include directing the approved proposal to (elsayedsalih@azhar.edu.eg) also data will be available at our university's warehouse after publication.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)
  • Analytic Code

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vesico-Ureteral Reflux

Clinical Trials on subureteral endoscopic Injection of Dextranomer/Hyaluronic acid (Dexell)

Subscribe