Dentofacial Effects Of Two Non-Compliance Appliances In The Treatment Of Growing Skeletal Class III Patients

February 2, 2023 updated by: Bassant Alaa, Alexandria University

Three Dimensional Evaluation Of Dentofacial Effects Of Two Non-Compliance Appliances In The Treatment Of Growing Skeletal Class III Patients (A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)

Early orthodontic treatment of Class III malocclusions with skeletal and dentoalveolar imbalances, represents a continuous dilemma. This difficulty starts from their meticulous diagnosis and treatment planning till reaching satisfactory results and finally stability. Some appliances could be used to correct growing skeletal Class III patients, improving the skeletal and dentoalveolar relationships, creating proper conditions for final orthodontic treatment, more importantly avoiding surgery. These appliances remove patient compliance from the equation.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Aim of the work: Evaluate the skeletal, dentoalveolar and soft tissue effects of two different force application systems which are the pulling force (CS 2000® appliance/ CS appliance) and the pushing force (Reversed Forsus fatigue-resistant device/ RF appliance).

Materials and methods: A randomized controlled clinical trial will be conducted to address the aim of the study. Thirty three growing skeletal Class III patients (9-11 years) will be recruited upon a lateral cephalometric x-ray. Subjects complying with the inclusion criteria will be randomly assigned using a computer-generated list to one of the three groups Group I: Eleven patients treated with CS2000 appliance, Group II: Eleven patients treated with reversed Forsus Fatigue Resistant device and Group III: control group of Eleven untreated patients with a ratio of 1:1:1 allocation. A CBCT will be made before installing the appliances. After gaining a 2 mm positive overjet or a 6 months period, alginate impressions will be poured and dental casts will be made. Photographs and CBCTs will also be performed to record the dentofacial effect of the used appliances.

Keywords: Cone beam computed tomography, growing skeletal Class III, CS 2000® appliance, Reversed Forsus Fatigue resistant device.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

33

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Alexandria, Egypt, 03
        • Alexandria University Faculty of Dentistry

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

8 years to 11 years (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age range from 8 years to 11 years.
  • Cervical vertebrae maturation index (CVMI 2 and 3) identified on the lateral cephalometric radiograph.
  • Angle Class III molar relation.
  • Skeletal class III ANB ranges between (-4) - (0).
  • Wits appraisal ranges between (0) - (-5).
  • Patients with good oral hygiene, and a healthy periodontal condition.
  • Reversed over jet (-1) - (-6).
  • Normal vertical growth pattern (SN/MP angle 28˚-38˚).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A discrepancy between centric relation and maximum intercuspation.
  • Patients who underwent previous orthodontic treatment.
  • Patients currently receiving drug therapy that may affect orthodontic tooth movement.
  • Congenitally missing teeth or extracted teeth.
  • History of systemic disease or craniofacial syndromes or presence of cleft.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: CS 2000 appliance
treating growing skeletal Class III patients
treating growing Skeletal growing Class III patients
Other Names:
  • Reversed Forsus Fatigue resistant appliance
Active Comparator: Reversed Forsus Fatigue resistant appliance
treating growing skeletal Class III patients
treating growing Skeletal growing Class III patients
Other Names:
  • Reversed Forsus Fatigue resistant appliance
No Intervention: Control

A group of untreated skeletally growing class III patients will be recruited to account for the possible effects of growth in the treatment groups.

This group matches the treated groups in malocclusion, stages of skeletal maturation, and mean observation period. Those patients will be treated after the period of the study.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Skeletal readings angles
Time Frame: 6 months
SNA in degrees SNB in degrees ANB in degrees SN-MP in degrees
6 months
Skeletal readings percetanges
Time Frame: 6 months
LAFH in percentage
6 months
Skeletal readings in millimeters
Time Frame: 6 months
Wits appraisal in millimeters
6 months
Dental readings angles
Time Frame: 6 months
U1-PP in degrees U1- NA in degrees L1-MP in degrees L1-NB in degrees
6 months
Dental readings in millimeters
Time Frame: 6 months
U1-NA millimeters L1-NB in millimeters.
6 months
Soft tissue readings in millimeters
Time Frame: 6 months
UL- E plane in millimeters LL- E plane in millimeters
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in airway
Time Frame: 6 months
difference in airway volume in cubic millimeters .
6 months
Changes in TMJ
Time Frame: 6 months
anterior, posterior, superior and medial joint space in cubic milimeters.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bassant A Abbas, PHD resident, Alexandria University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 26, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 30, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 3, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2023

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

TREATMENT OF GROWING SKELETAL CLASS III PATIENTS

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Malocclusion, Angle Class III

Clinical Trials on CS 2000

3
Subscribe