CMR T1 Mapping for Diagnosis of Cardiac Amyloidosis (CMR for CA)

April 7, 2026 updated by: Daniel Lavall, University of Leipzig

Native T1 Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Diagnosis of Cardiac Amyloidosis

The study aims to test the diagnostic accuracy of T1 mapping for the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis prospectively. The hypothesis is that T1 mapping in older patients with symptomatic heart failure, increased LV wall thickness and elevated cardiac biomarkers is non-inferior to the reference method to diagnose cardiac amyloidosis (CA).

As secondary measure, a web-based ATTR probability estimator for the diagnosis of CA will be evaluated.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is an important differential diagnosis in older patients with symptomatic heart failure with preserved or mid-range ejection fraction and increased left ventricular wall thickness. The prevalence of CA among patients with heart failure and left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy is approximately 13%. However, diagnosis of CA is challenging because specific clinical signs are often lacking.

Amyloid fibrils deposit in the extracellular space of the myocardium increases myocardial T1 values on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). Therefore, T1 imaging provides a promising non-invasive method to identify CA.

A preliminary retrospective analysis of 128 patients with increased LV wall thickness identified an area under the curve of 0.9954 (p<0.0001) for native T1 to detect CA. The optimal cut-off value was 1341ms, with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 97%.

The investigators aim to test the diagnostic accuracy of T1 mapping for the diagnosis of CA compared to the reference method prospectively. Moreover, the web-based ATTR probability estimator for the diagnosis of CA will be evaluated.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

112

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Saxony
      • Leipzig, Saxony, Germany, 04103
        • University of Leipzig

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with symptomatic heart failure (NYHA functional class II to IV, LVEF ≥40%), increased left ventricular wall thickness and elevated cardiac biomarkers

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 60 years
  • Symptomatic heart failure (NYHA II-IV) with LVEF ≥40%
  • Increased LV wall thickness (≥12mm end-diastolic)
  • NT-proBNP ≥1000pg/mL
  • Elevated hs-troponin T ≥14ng/L

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications for CMR
  • Acute myocarditis
  • Acute myocardial infarction <1 month
  • Severe aortic stenosis and RAISE score < 2 points

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
CMR T1 mapping
Diagnostic accuracy of T1 mapping and ATTR probability estimator are tested against the reference methods (99mTc-DPD scintigraphy, laboratory screening for multiple myeloma / AL amyloidosis; or cardiac biopsy, if noninvasive evaluation is inconclusive)
Observed method
Observed method
Reference method
Reference method
If non-invasive tests for CA (99mTc-DPD scintigraphy, biochemistry) are inconclusive

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic accuracy of T1 mapping for diagnosis of CA
Time Frame: up to 7 days
Comparison of CMR T1 mapping to the reference method for diagnosis of CA
up to 7 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic accuracy of ATTR probability estimator to predict CA
Time Frame: up to 7 days
Comparison of a probability score to predict ATTR with the final diagnosis of ATTR
up to 7 days
Association of ATTR probability estimator values with cardiovascular outcome
Time Frame: 1 year
All-cause death, cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalizations
1 year
Association of parametric T1 values with cardiovascular outcome
Time Frame: 1 year
All-cause death, cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalizations
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 20, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 27, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure NYHA Class II

Clinical Trials on Native T1 CMR

Subscribe