Frequency and Intensity of Local Reactions in Patients Treated With 4% 5-FU vs 4% 5-FU Associated With an Emollient Cream: a Randomised, Controlled Clinical Trial

September 15, 2022 updated by: Pierre Fabre Medicament

Transient local skin reactions with topical Actinic Keratosis treatments such as 5-FluoroUracil (5-FU) often lead to non-adhesion from patients and thus to treatment failure. In regards to 5-FU treatment, these local reactions are related to the pharmacological action of the molecule. The current therapeutic challenge is to reduce the local reactions induced by 5-FU without interfering with its efficacy, in particular by the use of an emollient cream.

The aim of the present study is to investigate how the use of an emollient, namely Dexeryl, could improve the local skin reactions occurring during 4 weeks of a 4% 5-FU treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

146

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Arras, France
        • Private practice Maire
      • Nantes, France
        • CHU de Nantes hotel-Dieu
      • Pau, France
        • CHU PAU
      • Poitiers, France
        • CHU Poitiers
      • Saint-Étienne, France
        • CHU St Etienne Hôpital Nord
      • Bochum, Germany
        • Kath. Klinikum Bochum St. Josef-Hospital
      • Bonn, Germany
        • MVZ Dermatologisches Zentrum Bonn GmbH
      • Freising, Germany
        • Private Practice Kurzen
      • Hamburg, Germany
        • Dermatologikum Hamburg
      • Mainz-Bretzenheim, Germany
        • Private practice Quist
      • Witten, Germany, 58453
        • Hautarztpraxis
      • Witten, Germany
        • CentroDerm Clinic
      • Brescia, Italy
        • Uni Clinic Brescia
      • Catania, Italy
        • Uni Clinic Catania
      • Coppito, Italy
        • Uni Clinic L'Aquila
      • Genova, Italy
        • Policlinico San Martino
      • Messina, Italy
        • University of Messina
      • Modena, Italy
        • Uni Clinic Modena
      • Napoli, Italy
        • NAPLES VANVITELLI UNIVERSITI (Federico II Hospital)
      • Reggio Emilia, Italy
        • Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS
      • Roma, Italy
        • Catholic University Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli
      • Terracina, Italy
        • Sapienza University of Rome - Polo Pontino
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Centre medic Congres
      • Bilbao, Spain
        • Hospital Alfredo Espinosa
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor
      • Valencia, Spain
        • Instituto Valenciano de Oncología,
      • Villajoyosa, Spain
        • Hospital Marina Baixa

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Participants are eligible only if all of the following criteria apply:

Age

  1. Participant must be more than 18 years old inclusive, at the time of signing the informed consent.

    Type of Participant and Disease Characteristics

  2. Individuals with a clinical diagnosis of actinic keratosis (AK).
  3. Individuals harboring 5 or more clinically recognizable (palpable and/or visible to unaided eye) AK lesions of the face, and/or ears and/or scalp. The AK lesions must be clinically typical non hypertrophic and/or nonhyperkeratotic.
  4. Subject in good general condition and free of any disease state or condition which, in the investigator's opinion, could impair evaluation of actinic keratosis or could expose the subject to an unacceptable risk by study participation.

    Sex

  5. Male or female. A Female participant is eligible to participate if she is not a woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP), defined as postmenopausal (cessation of menses >12 months) or surgically sterile (history of bilateral tubal ligation, bilateral oophorectomy, total hysterectomy).

    Informed Consent

  6. Capable of giving signed informed consent, which includes compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the informed consent form (ICF) and in this protocol.

    Ethical/Legal considerations

  7. Affiliated to a social security system, or is a beneficiary (if applicable in the national regulation).

Exclusion Criteria:

Participants are excluded from the study if any of the following criteria apply:

Medical Conditions

  1. With AK lesions within treatment areas which are hyperkeratotic or which are clinically suspected to be squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).
  2. With pre-existing local skin reactions with a total score ≥ 3.
  3. History of hypersensitivity to the ingredients of Tolak® or Dexeryl®.
  4. With a known allergy to peanut or soya.
  5. Non postmenopausal or non surgically sterile woman considered as WOCBP, pregnant or breastfeeding women.

    Prior/Concomitant Therapy

  6. Under systemic 5-fluorouracil or any systemic cancer treatment within eight weeks prior to the study.
  7. Under any other topical AK treatments or therapies (e.g., Cryotherapy or Photodynamic therapy) in the treatment area(s) within eight weeks prior to starting the study.
  8. Treated with systemic steroids, immunosuppressants or immunomodulators within four weeks prior to the study.
  9. Under prescription retinoids or topical steroids in the treatment area(s) within four weeks prior to the study.
  10. With known dihydropyrimidinedehydrogénase (DPD) deficiency or under treatment with brivudine, sorivudine or analogues within 4 weeks prior to starting the study.
  11. Treated with glycolic acid products and alpha-hydroxy products in the treatment area(s) within four weeks prior to starting the study.
  12. Treated with chemical peeling products in the treatment area(s) within eight weeks prior to starting the study.

    Prior/Concurrent Clinical Study Experience

  13. Is participating in another clinical trial
  14. Has participated in another clinical trial within the last 30 days, has received treatment with known remnant effects or undergone investigation liable to interfere with the present clinical trial Other Exclusions
  15. Is a family member of the Investigator or any associate, colleague, and employee assisting in the conduct of the study (secretary, nurse, technician,…)
  16. Is in a position likely to represent a conflict of interest
  17. Has forfeited his / her freedom by administrative or legal award or is under guardianship

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 5-fluorouracil 4% (Tolak) + Dexeryl
This group will apply 5-FU once daily for 4 weeks, and Dexeryl once daily for 8 weeks.
Application of Tolak once daily in the evening for 4 weeks
Application of Dexeryl once daily in the morning for 8 weeks
Other: 5-fluorouracil 4% (Tolak)
This group will only apply 5-FU once daily for 4 weeks.
Application of Tolak once daily in the evening for 4 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Local Skin Reaction (LSR) total score
Time Frame: at 4 weeks or Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Investigator-assessed score: 6 objective items scored from 0-4 (erythema, flaking/scaling, crusting, swelling, vesiculation/pustulation, erosion/ulceration) for a minimal score of 0 (best outcome possible), and a maximal score of 24 (worst outcome possible).
at 4 weeks or Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Local Skin Reaction (LSR) total score
Time Frame: at 2 weeks (first follow-up)
Investigator-assessed score: 6 objective items scored from 0-4 (erythema, flaking/scaling, crusting, swelling, vesiculation/pustulation, erosion/ulceration) for a minimal score of 0 (best outcome possible), and a maximal score of 24 (worst outcome possible).
at 2 weeks (first follow-up)
Local Skin Reaction (LSR) total score
Time Frame: at 8 weeks (last follow up)
Investigator-assessed score: 6 objective items scored from 0-4 (erythema, flaking/scaling, crusting, swelling, vesiculation/pustulation, erosion/ulceration) for a minimal score of 0 (best outcome possible), and a maximal score of 24 (worst outcome possible).
at 8 weeks (last follow up)
Local Skin Reaction (LSR) items alone
Time Frame: at 2 weeks (first follow-up)
Presence/absence/intensity of each item of the LSR: 6 objective items scored from 0-4 (erythema, flaking/scaling, crusting, swelling, vesiculation/pustulation, erosion/ulceration). For each item, 0 is the best outcome possible, 4 is the worst
at 2 weeks (first follow-up)
Local Skin Reaction (LSR) items alone
Time Frame: at 4 weeks (second follow up)
Presence/absence/intensity of each item of the LSR: 6 objective items scored from 0-4 (erythema, flaking/scaling, crusting, swelling, vesiculation/pustulation, erosion/ulceration). For each item, 0 is the best outcome possible, 4 is the worst
at 4 weeks (second follow up)
Local Skin Reaction (LSR) items alone
Time Frame: at 8 weeks (last follow up)
Presence/absence/intensity of each item of the LSR: 6 objective items scored from 0-4 (erythema, flaking/scaling, crusting, swelling, vesiculation/pustulation, erosion/ulceration). For each item, 0 is the best outcome possible, 4 is the worst
at 8 weeks (last follow up)
Subjective signs at each visit
Time Frame: at 2 weeks (first follow-up)
Patient questionnaire evaluating prurit (0-3), stinging/burning (0-3), pain (0-4). 0 is the best outcome, 10 is the worst outcome.
at 2 weeks (first follow-up)
Subjective signs at each visit
Time Frame: at 4 weeks (second follow up)
Patient questionnaire evaluating prurit (0-3), stinging/burning (0-3), pain (0-4). 0 is the best outcome, 10 is the worst outcome.
at 4 weeks (second follow up)
Subjective signs at each visit
Time Frame: at 8 weeks (last follow up)
Patient questionnaire evaluating prurit (0-3), stinging/burning (0-3), pain (0-4). 0 is the best outcome, 10 is the worst outcome.
at 8 weeks (last follow up)
Local reactions according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (CTCAE) grade 3 or 4
Time Frame: at 2 weeks (first follow-up)
Intensity grading of adverse events
at 2 weeks (first follow-up)
Local reactions according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (CTCAE) grade 3 or 4
Time Frame: at 4 weeks (second follow up)
Intensity grading of adverse events
at 4 weeks (second follow up)
Local reactions according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (CTCAE) grade 3 or 4
Time Frame: at 8 weeks (last follow up)
Intensity grading of adverse events
at 8 weeks (last follow up)
Adverse Events reported by patients or noticed by investigator
Time Frame: at 2, 4 and 8 weeks (first follow-up)
at 2, 4 and 8 weeks (first follow-up)
Drop outs due to Adverse Events (AE) related to local skin reaction
Time Frame: at 2, 4 and 8 weeks (first follow-up)
discontinuation rate
at 2, 4 and 8 weeks (first follow-up)
Use of rescue treatment
Time Frame: at 2 weeks (first follow-up)
at 2 weeks (first follow-up)
Use of rescue treatment
Time Frame: at 4 weeks (second follow up)
at 4 weeks (second follow up)
Use of rescue treatment
Time Frame: at 8 weeks (last follow up)
at 8 weeks (last follow up)
Treatment satisfaction (acceptability): measured by Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication version 9 (TSQM-9)
Time Frame: at 4 weeks (end of treatment) or at Patient Withdrawal
The TSQM-9 questionnaire includes nine questions that assess patients' satisfaction by providing score on three scales: effectiveness (questions 1 to 3), convenience (questions 4 to 6) and global satisfaction (questions 7 to 9). The scores of each scale range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates a greater satisfaction
at 4 weeks (end of treatment) or at Patient Withdrawal
Treatment adherence
Time Frame: at 4 weeks
assessed by the participant using a self questionnaire
at 4 weeks
Treatment adherence
Time Frame: at optional visit (when applicable), up to 8 weeks
assessed by the participant using a self questionnaire
at optional visit (when applicable), up to 8 weeks
Health-related quality of life measured by actinic keratosis quality of life questionnaire (AKQoL)
Time Frame: at 8 weeks (last follow up)
actinic keratosis quality of life patient questionnaire, for Spain and Germany only. 0 is the best outcome, 27 is the worst outcome
at 8 weeks (last follow up)
Rates of patients with complete and partial clearance rates
Time Frame: at 8 weeks (last follow up)
at 8 weeks (last follow up)
Rates of patients with partial clearance rates
Time Frame: at 8 weeks (last follow up)
at 8 weeks (last follow up)
Percentage change in number of AK lesions
Time Frame: at baseline
at baseline
Percentage change in number of AK lesions
Time Frame: at 2 weeks (first follow-up)
at 2 weeks (first follow-up)
Change in number of AK lesions
Time Frame: at 2 weeks (first follow-up)
at 2 weeks (first follow-up)
Percentage change in number of AK lesions
Time Frame: at 4 weeks (second follow up)
at 4 weeks (second follow up)
Change in number of AK lesions
Time Frame: at 4 weeks (second follow up)
at 4 weeks (second follow up)
Percentage change in number of AK lesions
Time Frame: at 8 weeks (last follow up)
at 8 weeks (last follow up)
Change in number of AK lesions
Time Frame: at 8 weeks (last follow up)
at 8 weeks (last follow up)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Eggert STOCKFLETH, Pr., Kath. Klinikum Bochum St. Josef-Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 16, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 18, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 19, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Actinic Keratoses

Clinical Trials on 5-fluorouracil 4% (Tolak)

3
Subscribe