Prediction of Amyloid and Mild Cognitive Impairment in Early Stage Alzheimer's Disease From Remote Speech Phenotyping (EARS)

June 14, 2021 updated by: Novoic Limited

Prediction of Amyloid and Mild Cognitive Impairment in Early Stage Alzheimer's Disease From Remote Speech Phenotyping (EARS)

The S22 study investigates, in a cross-sectional study, the ability of algorithms that analyse acoustic and linguistic patterns of spoken language to predict the presence of amyloid positivity in early stage Alzheimer's disease, specifically in Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and cognitively normal (CN) cohorts; and whether similar algorithms can predict cognitive functioning, in classifying MCI vs CN.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

140

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Head of Clinical Operations
  • Phone Number: 07849522891
  • Email: marton@novoic.com

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

US and UK-based study population.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Amyloid status must be known, based on an amyloid PET scan or CSF amyloid test, no older than 30 months at the time of consent for Arm 2 and Arm 4 participants (amyloid negative Arms).
  • Amyloid status must be known, based on an amyloid PET scan or CSF amyloid test, no older than 60 months at the time of consent for Arm 1 and Arm 3 (amyloid positive Arms).
  • Subjects must be aged 50-85 (inclusive).
  • Subjects must have MMSE scores of 23-30 (inclusive) based on a test not older than 1 month at the time of the visit.
  • Date of diagnosis (if applicable) maximum of five years prior to consent.
  • Subjects' first language must be English.
  • Willing to participate in a study investigating speech and cognitive impairment.
  • Able to provide valid informed consent.
  • Able to use, or has a caregiver who is able to use a smartphone device.
  • Has access to a smartphone device running an operation system of Android 6 or above; or iOS 10 or above.

If taking part in the study through virtual visits, the following inclusion criteria also applies:

  • Able to use, or has a caregiver who is able to use a personal computer, notebook or tablet.
  • Has access to a personal computing device of that is running an operating system of macOS X with macOS 10.9 or later, or Windows 7 or above, or Ubuntu 12.04 or higher; OR has access internet browser software Internet Explorer version 11 or above; or Microsoft Edge version 12 or above, or Firefox version 27 or above, or Google Chrome version 30 or above, or Safari version 7 or above; AND capable of audio and video recording; AND able to connect to the internet.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinically significant unstable psychiatric illness in 6 months.
  • Diagnosis of General Anxiety Disorder.
  • Current, or history within the past 2 years of major depressive disorder diagnosis (according to DSM-5 criteria83); or psychiatric symptoms that, in the opinion of the investigator, could interfere with study procedures.
  • History or presence of stroke within the past 2 years.
  • Documented history of transient ischemic attack or unexplained loss of consciousness within the last 12 months.
  • The participant is using drugs to treat symptoms related to AD, and the doses of these drugs were not stable for at least 8 weeks prior to consent.
  • Participant is, or previously has been enrolled in the Sponsor's NOV-0100 or NOV-0110 studies.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Arm 2: MCI amyloid negative
  • Non-AD Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)
  • Negative amyloid PET or amyloid CSF status.
  • MMSE 23-30 (inclusive)
Arm 3: CN amyloid positive
  • Absence of a diagnosis of cognitive disorder and/or subjectively reported cognitive decline
  • Positive amyloid PET or amyloid CSF status.
  • MMSE 26-30 (inclusive)
Arm 4: CN amyloid negative
  • Absence of a diagnosis of cognitive disorder and/or subjectively reported cognitive decline
  • Negative amyloid PET or amyloid CSF status.
  • MMSE 26-30 (inclusive)
Arm 1: MCI amyloid positive
  • Meet the National Institute of Aging - Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA) core clinical criteria (2011) for MCI due to Alzheimer's
  • Positive amyloid PET or amyloid CSF status.
  • MMSE 23-30 (inclusive)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the binary classifier distinguishing between amyloid positive (Arms 1 and 3) and amyloid negative (Arms 2 and 4) Arms using speech recordings as input.
Time Frame: baseline
baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The sensitivity of the binary classifier distinguishing between amyloid positive (Arms 1 and 3) and amyloid negative (Arms 2 and 4) Arms.
Time Frame: baseline
baseline
The specificity of the binary classifier distinguishing between amyloid positive (Arms 1 and 3) and amyloid negative (Arms 2 and 4) Arms.
Time Frame: baseline
baseline
The Cohen's kappa of the binary classifier distinguishing between amyloid positive (Arms 1 and 3) and amyloid negative (Arms 2 and 4) Arms.
Time Frame: baseline
baseline
The sensitivity of the binary classifier distinguishing between amyloid positive cognitively normal (CN) (Arm 3) and amyloid negative cognitively normal (CN) (Arm 4) Arms.
Time Frame: baseline
baseline
The specificity of the binary classifier distinguishing between amyloid positive cognitively normal (CN) (Arm 3) and amyloid negative cognitively normal (CN) (Arm 4) Arms.
Time Frame: baseline
baseline
The Cohen's kappa of the binary classifier distinguishing between amyloid positive cognitively normal (CN) (Arm 3) and amyloid negative cognitively normal (CN) (Arm 4) Arms.
Time Frame: baseline
baseline
The AUC of the binary classifier distinguishing between amyloid positive cognitively normal (CN) (Arm 3) and amyloid negative cognitively normal (CN) (Arm 4) Arms.
Time Frame: baseline
baseline
The sensitivity of the binary classifier distinguishing between amyloid positive MCI (Arm 1) and amyloid negative MCI (Arm 2) Arms.
Time Frame: baseline
baseline
The specificity of the binary classifier distinguishing between amyloid positive MCI (Arm 1) and amyloid negative MCI (Arm 2) Arms.
Time Frame: baseline
baseline
The Cohen's kappa of the binary classifier distinguishing between amyloid positive MCI (Arm 1) and amyloid negative MCI (Arm 2) Arms.
Time Frame: baseline
baseline
The AUC of the binary classifier distinguishing between amyloid positive MCI (Arm 1) and amyloid negative MCI (Arm 2) Arms.
Time Frame: baseline
baseline
The sensitivity of the binary classifier distinguishing between the MCI (Arms 1 and 2) and the CN (Arms 3 and 4) Arms.
Time Frame: baseline
baseline
The specificity of the binary classifier distinguishing between the MCI (Arms 1 and 2) and the CN (Arms 3 and 4) Arms.
Time Frame: baseline
baseline
The Cohen's kappa of the binary classifier distinguishing between the MCI (Arms 1 and 2) and the CN (Arms 3 and 4) Arms.
Time Frame: baseline
baseline
The AUC of the binary classifier distinguishing between the MCI (Arms 1 and 2) and the CN (Arms 3 and 4) Arms.
Time Frame: baseline
baseline
For each classifier/regressor in outcome 1-16, the correlation between the AUC/CIA and each age group, gender and speech-to-reverberation modulation energy ratio group, as measured by the Kendall rank correlation coefficient.
Time Frame: baseline
baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

June 20, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 15, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 14, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 16, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 16, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alzheimer Disease

3
Subscribe