Bright Ideas - CIN Feasibility Study

January 12, 2024 updated by: Lee Dupuis, The Hospital for Sick Children

Improving Chemotherapy-induced Nausea Control Through Bright Ideas®-CIN Training: a Feasibility Study in Children Receiving Oral Chemotherapy

In this study investigators will determine the feasibility of a future trial comparing chemotherapy-induced nausea control in children with ALL receiving oral 6-mercaptopurine who do and do not receive problem-solving skill training. This is a novel approach to controlling an important and common treatment-related symptom.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

This study will evaluate a novel approach to controlling a treatment-related symptom that detracts significantly from the quality of life of many patients. It will preserve and enhance the patient's and family's autonomy with respect to self-care. If found to be effective, this approach may be generalizable to pediatric patients receiving chemotherapy other than 6-mercaptopurine and thus has the potential to improve the quality of life of many children receiving cancer therapy.

This study will evaluate the efficacy of Bright IDEAS-CIN, adapted from the validated Bright IDEAS framework to improve CIN control in children with ALL who experience nausea while receiving 6-mercaptopurine. Bright IDEAS is an 8-session face-to-face intervention with a caregiver. In this first session, the caregiver is taught the problem-solving framework and begins working on their first self-selected problem. Sessions 2-7 involve working through relevant problems, with most caregivers working through 3-4 different problems. The final session summarizes the skills and discusses how to continue to use these new skills for new problems instead of lapsing into old ineffective strategies. Investigators adapted Bright IDEAS to meet the specific problem of CINV by adapting it to 3 sessions focused specifically on CINV, including the child in the conversation when developmentally appropriate and allowing the latter sessions to be conducted by phone or video-chat.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

75

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 1X8
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital for Sick Children
        • Contact:
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90027
    • New Jersey
      • New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States, 08901
    • Virginia
      • Falls Church, Virginia, United States, 22042

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

4 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age: ≥ 4 years (PeNAT validated in patients 4 to 18 yrs)
  • newly diagnosed or recurrent disease: first diagnosis of ALL (i.e. non-relapsed) in maintenance therapy
  • English, French or Spanish-speaking with an English, French or Spanish-speaking guardian (PeNAT available in these languages)
  • without physical or cognitive impairments that preclude use of the PeNAT
  • planned to receive PO 6-mercaptopurine
  • not planned to receive IV, IM, SC or IT chemotherapy or oral or IV corticosteroids during the 7-day study period

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Bright Ideas- CIN Training

The PSST will be delivered by a "trainer" in a minimum of three 30-minute to 1-hour sessions with a parent and patient (if developmentally appropriate).

During the first session, the study team member will build rapport by understanding relevant personal background and medical information; introduce PSST and the Bright IDEAS paradigm; review the patients experience with nausea as reported in Phase 1 and at other times during treatment; promote problem-solving strategies and skills; and develop an anti-nausea action plan. During the second session, the trainer will discuss how well the prior action plan worked and reinforce successful outcomes or, if unsuccessful, return to the problem-solving steps to generate a new action plan. The third session will review progress on CINV control, assist in problem-solving as needed, and discuss how to continue to use the Bright IDEAS framework to resolve future issues with CINV or symptom management more broadly.

Bright IDEAS is a validated problem-solving skill training intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent of eligible patients who consent/assent to participate and completion of study procedures by 20 patients within 24 months
Time Frame: 24 months from study activation

A future trial will be feasible if

  • 50% of patients deemed to be eligible to participate in Phase 1 consent/assent to participate
  • the recruitment into Phase 2 of 20 evaluable patients across all participating centers within 24 months of study activation of whom 80% return a completed CINV diary for at least 5 days of each 7-day data collection period. A completed CINV diary contains at least one PeNAT score and a record of the time of each vomiting episode or noting the presence/absence of vomiting daily. Evaluable patients are defined as those who have completed at least one cycle of PSST.
24 months from study activation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
CIN and CIV incidence
Time Frame: 24 months from study activation
Proportion of children who report CIN and chemotherapy-induced vomiting (CIV) in Phase 1 and Phase 2
24 months from study activation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lee Dupuis, PhD, SickKids Research Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 8, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 16, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)

Clinical Trials on Bright Ideas - CIN Training

3
Subscribe