CUIDA-TE, an APP for the Emotional Management (CUIDA-TE)

January 15, 2024 updated by: University of Valencia

CUIDA-TE, an APP for the Emotional Management of the Healthcare Professionals

The aim of this study is to develop and validate an Ecological Momentary Intervention APP for healthcare workers, in order to face of work-related stresses generated by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a very high emotional impact on healthcare workers. Ecological momentary interventions (EMI) can offer an intervention in real time, when the emotion arises. CUIDA-TE is an EMI APP based on principles of different transdiagnostic cognitive behavioral interventions focused on emotion regulation. The effectiveness of CUIDA-TE will be investigated in the current study. A two-arms randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted. At least 182 healthcare workers will be randomly assigned to a 2-month immediate intervention group (CUIDA-TE APP, n= 91), or a control group (no assessment or intervention, n=91). The CUIDA-TE consists of an app-based EMI that estimates and intervenes based on ecological momentary assessment data of five emotional states: joy, fatigue, sadness, anxiety, anger, as well as sleep quality, sleep quantity, burnout, perceived stress, and self-perception of coping skills. The primary outcome is the PHQ-9. Secondary outcomes include ERQ, DERS, OASIS, BRS, SUS, and ProQOL questionnaires. Primary and secondary outcomes will be obtained at pre- and post-intervention measurements, and at 3-month follow-up measurement.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

340

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Valencia, Spain, 46010
        • University of Valencia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 67 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • to be a healthcare worker in active (from 18 until 67 years)
  • to have a smartphone with Internet access and Android operating system.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • to be in psychological treatment at the time of the recruitment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention group
The group will receive the ecological momentary intervention (CUIDA-TE APP). This intervention will allow the individual to learn and practice adaptive ways to regulate their emotions. The protocol contains the following components: Distraction, acceptation skills, re-appraisal and problem-solving skills.
During 2 months participants will be able to asses their mood and practice in real time their emotional regulation skills with an ecological momentary interventions APP.
Other Names:
  • CUIDA-TE APP
No Intervention: Control group
This condition is a waiting list control group with no intervention. The participants will wait for a period of 3 months. They will be offered the possibility of receiving the intervention APP (CUIDA-TE) after the waiting list period.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assess change in Brief Patient Health Questionnaire Mood Scale (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: Change from baseline(PRE), at 2 months (post intervention)and at 3 months (follow-up)
The PHQ-9 assess depression construct and includes nine items: (1) anhedonia; (2) depressed mood; (3) trouble sleeping; (4) feeling tired; (5) change in appetite; (6) guilt, self-blame, or worthlessness; (7) trouble concentrating; (8) feeling slowed down or restless; and (9) thoughts of being better off dead or hurting oneself. PHQ-9 score can range from 0 to 27, since each of the 9 items can be scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). The PHQ-9 score is divided in the following severity categories: 5-9 (mild depression), 10-14 (modera depression), 15-19 (moderately severe depression) and 20 or greater (severe depression).
Change from baseline(PRE), at 2 months (post intervention)and at 3 months (follow-up)
Assess change in Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ)
Time Frame: Change from baseline(PRE), at 2 months (post intervention)and at 3 months (follow-up)
A 10-item scale designed to measure respondents' tendency to regulate their emotions in two ways: (1) Cognitive Reappraisal and (2) Expressive Suppression. Respondents answer each item on a 7-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). High score indicates more likely to use this kind of emotion regulation strategies (Reappraisal Items: 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 10; Suppression Items: 2, 4, 6, 9).
Change from baseline(PRE), at 2 months (post intervention)and at 3 months (follow-up)
Assess change in Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS)
Time Frame: Change from baseline(PRE), at 2 months (post intervention)and at 3 months (follow-up)
The DERS is a 36-item self-report measure of six facets of emotion regulation. Spanish validated version (Hervás & Jódar, 2008) has 28-items rated on a scale of 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate more difficulty in emotion regulation.
Change from baseline(PRE), at 2 months (post intervention)and at 3 months (follow-up)
Assess change in Brief Resilience Scale (BRS)
Time Frame: Change from baseline(PRE), at 2 months (post intervention)and at 3 months (follow-up)
The BRS is a 6-item self-report measure to assess the ability to bounce back or recover from stress. The items are rated on a 5-point scale (1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree). Range from 6 (low resilience) to 30 (high resilience).
Change from baseline(PRE), at 2 months (post intervention)and at 3 months (follow-up)
Assess change in Burnout
Time Frame: Change from baseline(PRE), at 2 months (post intervention)and at 3 months (follow-up)
Three items for assessing burnout in medical professionals. Higher score indicate more perceived burnout.
Change from baseline(PRE), at 2 months (post intervention)and at 3 months (follow-up)
Assess change in ProQOL-V
Time Frame: Change from baseline(PRE), at 2 months (post intervention)and at 3 months (follow-up)
The ProQOL (Professional Quality of Life Scale) was developed as a measure of both the negative and positive effects of working with those who have experienced traumatic stress. The ProQOL has sub-scales for compassion satisfaction, burnout, and compassion fatigue.The responses are rated on 5-point scale, indicating the frequency of each item in the last 30 days (1 = never, 2 = rarely, 3= Sometimes, 4= Often and 5 = Very Often). Higher scores on the compassion satisfaction scale represent a greater satisfaction related to the ability of the professional to be an effective caregiver in his/her job. Higher scores on the burnout scale mean a higher risk for burnout and higher scores in secondary traumatic stress indicate the professional is higher exposed to traumatic events.
Change from baseline(PRE), at 2 months (post intervention)and at 3 months (follow-up)
Assess in usability with the System Usability Scale
Time Frame: At 2 months (post intervention)
The System Usability Scale (SUS; Brooke, 1996) is a reliable, 10-item questionnaire that assess the usability of a technology application. The items are rated from 1 ("Strongly disagree") to 5 ("Strongly agree"). The scale is corrected with a formula that allows to obtain scores between 0 -100 points. Unacceptable usability (with SUS scores below 50) could indicate that a user had difficulties while using the program and could be interpreted as a barrier for the clinical effect.
At 2 months (post intervention)
Assess change in Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS)
Time Frame: Change from baseline(PRE), at 2 months (post intervention)and at 3 months (follow-up)
The OASIS is a 5-item self-report measure to assess anxiety severity and impairment
Change from baseline(PRE), at 2 months (post intervention)and at 3 months (follow-up)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Joy daily item integrated in the APP mobile
Time Frame: During intervention process up to 2 months

Item to assess joy/happiness daily through APP mobile. User will rate the item rating between 0 (No happiness) to 10 (Extremely happiness)

EXAMPLE ITEM:

Please, indicate the intensity of your CURRENT HAPPINESS 0= No happiness-------------------------------10= Extremely happy

Item taken from mobile APP validated in Suso-Ribera C, Castilla D, Zaragozá I, Ribera-Canudas MV, Botella C, García-Palacios A. Validity, reliability, feasibility, and usefulness of pain monitor. Clin J Pain. 2018;34(10):900-8.

During intervention process up to 2 months
Fatigue daily item integrated in the APP mobile
Time Frame: During intervention process up to 2 months

Item to assess Fatigue daily through APP mobile. User will rate the item rating between 0 (No Fatigue) to 10 (Extreme fatigue)

EXAMPLE ITEM:

Please, indicate the intensity of your CURRENT FATIGUE 0= No fatigue--------------------------------10= Extreme fatigue

Item taken from mobile APP validated in Suso-Ribera C, Castilla D, Zaragozá I, Ribera-Canudas MV, Botella C, García-Palacios A. Validity, reliability, feasibility, and usefulness of pain monitor. Clin J Pain. 2018;34(10):900-8.00-8.

During intervention process up to 2 months
Sadness daily item integrated in the APP mobile
Time Frame: During intervention process up to 2 months
Item from mobile APP validated in Suso-Ribera C, Castilla D, Zaragozá I, Ribera-Canudas MV, Botella C, García-Palacios A. Validity, reliability, feasibility, and usefulness of pain monitor. Clin J Pain. 2018;34(10):900-8.
During intervention process up to 2 months
Anxiety daily item integrated in the APP mobile
Time Frame: During intervention process up to 2 months

Item to assess Anxiety daily through APP mobile. User will rate the item rating between 0 (No Anxiety) to 10 (Extremely Anxious)

EXAMPLE ITEM:

Please, indicate the intensity of your CURRENT ANXIETY 0= No anxiety-----------------------------10= Extremely anxious

Item taken from mobile APP validated in Suso-Ribera C, Castilla D, Zaragozá I, Ribera-Canudas MV, Botella C, García-Palacios A. Validity, reliability, feasibility, and usefulness of pain monitor. Clin J Pain. 2018;34(10):900-8.

Item from mobile APP validated in Suso-Ribera C, Castilla D, Zaragozá I, Ribera-Canudas MV, Botella C, García-Palacios A. Validity, reliability, feasibility, and usefulness of pain monitor. Clin J Pain. 2018;34(10):900-8.

During intervention process up to 2 months
anger daily item integrated in the APP mobile
Time Frame: During intervention process up to 2 months

Item to assess Anger daily through APP mobile. User will rate the item rating between 0 (No Anger) to 10 (Extremely Angry)

EXAMPLE ITEM:

Please, indicate the intensity of your CURRENT ANGER 0= No anger-------------------------------10= Extremely angry

Item from mobile APP validated in Suso-Ribera C, Castilla D, Zaragozá I, Ribera-Canudas MV, Botella C, García-Palacios A. Validity, reliability, feasibility, and usefulness of pain monitor. Clin J Pain. 2018;34(10):900-8.

During intervention process up to 2 months
sleep quality daily item integrated in the APP mobile
Time Frame: During intervention process up to 2 months

Item to assess sleep quanlity daily through APP mobile. User will rate if the work have interfered with the quality of sleep rating between 0 (No interference) to 10 (maximum interference)

EXAMPLE ITEM:

Has WORK interfered with the quality of your SLEEP tonight? 0 = No Interference----------------------10 = Maximum Interference

Item elaborated AD HOC for this study

During intervention process up to 2 months
sleep quantity daily item integrated in the APP mobile
Time Frame: During intervention process up to 2 months

Item to assess sleep quantity daily through APP mobile. The user will rate the number of hours of sleep each day.

EXAMPLE ITEM:

How many hours have you slept in the last 24 hours?

Item elaborated AD HOC for this study

During intervention process up to 2 months
burnout daily item integrated in the APP mobile
Time Frame: During intervention process up to 2 months

Item to assess the degree of perceived burnout daily through APP mobile. User will rate the item rating between 0 (Totally disagree) to 10 (Totally agree)

EXAMPLE ITEM:

Please, indicate your degree of agreement with the next statement: "I am burned out from my work" 0= totally disagree----------------------------------------10= totally agree

Item adapted from West CP, Dyrbye LN, Sloan JA, Shanafelt TD. Single item measures of emotional exhaustion and depersonalization are useful for assessing burnout in medical professionals. JGen Intern Med. 2009; 24(12):1318-1321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-1129-z PMID: 19802645

During intervention process up to 2 months
perceived stress daily item integrated in the APP mobile
Time Frame: During intervention process up to 2 months

Item to assess perceived stress daily through APP mobile. User will rate the item rating between 0 (No stress) to 10 (Extremely stressed)

EXAMPLE ITEM:

Please, indicate the intensity of your CURRENT STRESS 0= No stress------------------------------10= Extremely stressed

Item created AD HOC for this study.

During intervention process up to 2 months
self-perception of coping skills daily item integrated in the APP mobile
Time Frame: During intervention process up to 2 months

Item to assess perceived self-perception of coping skills daily through APP mobile.

User will rate the item rating between 0 (No capable) to 10 (Extremely capable)

EXAMPLE ITEM:

To what extent do you feel CAPABLE OF COPING with your problems right now? 0= No capable---------------------------------10= Extremely capable

Item created AD HOC for this study.

During intervention process up to 2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Diana Castilla, PhD, University of Valencia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 14, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 9, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 6, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

July 12, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 17, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • UValencia_RCT_CUIDATE

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Burnout, Professional

Clinical Trials on Experimental: Intervention group

3
Subscribe