Theta Burst Brain Stimulation in Diabetic Neuropathy Patients With Neuropathic Pain: Investigating Neural Mechanisms

June 21, 2022 updated by: Virginia Commonwealth University
The purpose of the study is to determine the effects of a newer form of non-invasive brain stimulation (called transcranial magnetic stimulation or TMS) as a treatment in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy to examine its effects on their understanding of their pain experience.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The proposed brain stimulation technique in this study is an investigational procedure that has not been approved by the U.S. FDA for treating pain linked to diabetic neuropathy, but it has been approved to treat depression. The study will use surveys to monitor how participant's body changes as their understanding of their pain experience changes. Participants will be randomized (like the flip of a coin) to receive brain stimulation at one of two brain regions which are involved in the processing and understanding of the pain experience.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

49

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Virginia
      • Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23298
        • Virginia Commonwealth University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with type II Diabetes Mellitus.
  • Age 18-75 years.
  • Diagnosed by a Physician with diabetic neuropathy/ distal symmetric polyneuropathy/ diabetic polyneuropathy.
  • Patients under physician care at Virginia Commonwealth University Health Systems in the Neurology Clinic/ Neurology Department and the Endocrinology Clinic
  • Neuropathic pain for at least 3 months.
  • Neuropathic pain signs and symptoms identified using Pain DETECT questionnaire.
  • Current pain score ≥3 or higher (0='no pain' and 10='worst possible pain').
  • Pain Medication dosage stable for at least 4 weeks

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-neuropathic chronic pain
  • Another concurrent cause of neuropathic pain
  • Any history of epilepsy, drug-resistant migraine, and/or any presence of ferromagnetic implant, cardiac pacemakers, implanted insulin pumps, neurostimulators, cochlear implants and surgical clips or medical pumps.
  • Limited English proficiency
  • Pregnant patients

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: BASIC_SCIENCE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Primary motor cortex (M1)
Stimulation of the M1
Non-invasive brain stimulation (transcranial magnetic stimulation or TMS) which consists of a stimulating coil being held over the head. When this coil delivers a painless magnetic pulse, it feels like a quick, light tap on the head. Two different coils will be used to perform TMS. One coil will be used to determine stimulation parameters for the pcTBS protocol. The second coil will be used to implement pcTBS, which is a repetitive non-invasive brain stimulation protocol which feels like many quick, light taps on the head. Participants will receive two procedures during one session, one with active stimulation and one with inactive stimulation.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC)
Stimulation of the DLPFC
Non-invasive brain stimulation (transcranial magnetic stimulation or TMS) which consists of a stimulating coil being held over the head. When this coil delivers a painless magnetic pulse, it feels like a quick, light tap on the head. Two different coils will be used to perform TMS. One coil will be used to determine stimulation parameters for the pcTBS protocol. The second coil will be used to implement pcTBS, which is a repetitive non-invasive brain stimulation protocol which feels like many quick, light taps on the head. Participants will receive two procedures during one session, one with active stimulation and one with inactive stimulation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Norfolk Quality of Life-Diabetic Neuropathy (QOL-DN) score
Time Frame: Baseline to the end of the procedure, about 2.25 hours
The QOL-DN is questionnaire is an instrument to assess quality of life in patients with diabetic polyneuropathy. It is comprised of 35 items and yields a Total QOL score.
Baseline to the end of the procedure, about 2.25 hours
Change in bodily and emotional perception of pain (BEEP) score
Time Frame: Baseline to the end of the procedure, about 2.25 hours
The BEEP questionnaire is a self-report questionnaire measuring the impact of chronic pain on daily life. It has 23 items on a 0-5 Likert scale that assesses three pain dimensions, namely the emotional reaction to pain, the limitations to daily life caused by pain and the interference caused by pain in personal and social functioning. Responses are summed to yield a single BEEP score.
Baseline to the end of the procedure, about 2.25 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in pain threshold - conditioned pain modulation (CPM)
Time Frame: Baseline to the end of the procedure, about 2.25 hours
To measure CPM, brief amounts of slight pressure using a handheld pressure device will be applied to a location either on the forearm or leg where the patient reports a current absence of pain. An average index percent ratio will be calculated from the pressure device in kilopascals at which participants report the pressure was first perceived as painful during a baseline assessment and during an assessment when the participant's contralateral hand was placed in cold water. Change will be measured by subtracting CPM scores before and after the active procedure.
Baseline to the end of the procedure, about 2.25 hours
Change in pain threshold - Temporal Summation of Pain (TSP)
Time Frame: Baseline to the end of the procedure, about 2.25 hours
To measure TSP, the same pressure using a handheld pressure device that was perceived as first painful will be applied to a location either on the forearm or leg where the patient reports a current absence of pain. This pressure will be applied repeatedly applied 10 times and participants will be asked to report their pain on a 0-10 scale where 0 is no pain and 10 is worst pain imaginable. Change will be measured by subtracting TSP scores before and after the active procedure.
Baseline to the end of the procedure, about 2.25 hours
Change in pain threshold - Offset Analgesia (OA)
Time Frame: Baseline to the end of the procedure, about 2.25 hours
A Velcro strap tied to participants forearm connected to a device that transmits heat will be used to measure OA. Three different temperatures of mild heat will be applied. Participants will use a visual analog scale (VAS, no heat 0- extreme heat 10) to rate the intensity of the heat stimulus at each temperature. Minimal VAS ratings at the highest temperature will be subtracted from maximal VAS ratings at the lowest temperature to yield OA value. Change will be measured by subtracting OA values before and after the active procedure.
Baseline to the end of the procedure, about 2.25 hours
Change in cortical inhibition (CI)
Time Frame: Baseline to the end of the procedure, about 2.25 hours
The amplitude the motor evoked potentials (MEPS) from two simultaneous pulses will be used to determine level of cortical inhibition.
Baseline to the end of the procedure, about 2.25 hours
Change in corticospinal excitability (CE)
Time Frame: Baseline to the end of the procedure, about 2.25 hours
The amplitude the motor evoked potentials (MEPS) from a single pulse will be used to determine level of corticomotor excitability
Baseline to the end of the procedure, about 2.25 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

September 3, 2021

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 16, 2022

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 16, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 23, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 23, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

August 3, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

June 22, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 21, 2022

Last Verified

June 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetic Neuropathy, Painful

Clinical Trials on Prolonged continuous theta burst stimulation (pcTBS)

3
Subscribe