Text Messages for Liver Transplant Recipients

August 17, 2021 updated by: Caitlin Sayegh, Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Text Messages for Adolescent and Young Adult Liver Transplant Recipients

Although medical advancements have enabled children experiencing liver transplants to live longer, medical management post-transplant is ongoing and complex. Many findings underscore adolescents as being a particularly vulnerable population, with rates of nonadherence being four times higher than in adults. This pilot study aims to explore the feasibility and impact of a brief text-messaging intervention in a randomized controlled trials (N = 50). We have three primary aims: 1) Study patient satisfaction with and utilization of this intervention in order to better understand feasibility and acceptability; 2) Investigate the effects of this intervention on medication adherence, healthcare utilization, and health status; and 3) Examine potential effects of the intervention on the physician-patient relationship, motivation for adherence, and other variables.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The proposed randomized control pilot study will be based at the Liver Transplant Clinic at CHLA. Approximately 25 participants will be randomly assigned to the intervention arm, whereas 25 participants will be assigned to treatment as usual (TAU), for a total sample size of N = 50. As there are approximately 90 patients who meet inclusion criteria currently in care, recruiting 50 for this study is feasible. The intervention will last for six months. During this time, participants in the intervention arm will receive a brief text-message on their cell-phones whenever laboratory blood tests indicate that immunosuppressant medications are within the expected range. This will primarily be measured via trough levels of calcineurin inhibitors, but will also take into account complete blood count, comprehensive metabolic panel, and magnesium level results, as reviewed by the transplant physician. The purpose of these text messages is to alert participants that physicians are indeed checking participant liver levels and recognizing when participants are putting in the work to keep themselves healthy. Multiple standardized text messages will be created so that participants do not receive identical ones each time. An example text message may include "Your liver levels have been checked and look good. The effort you are putting into taking your meds shows!" Participants in the TAU arm will not receive any text messages.If trough levels or any other study measure indicates possible nonadherence, nonadherence will still be addressed by their physicians, social work, or whatever is indicated per clinic standard of care. Furthermore, additional psychosocial or medical support will not be withheld from patients whose labs indicate nonadherence for either the intervention or TAU arms.

All participants will complete questionnaires at four points: Baseline, mid-way through the intervention period (three-months), immediately after the conclusion of the intervention (six-months), and three months post-intervention. Participants will complete self-report measures assessing medication adherence (Visual Analogue Scale), participants' sense of trust in their medical providers (Trust in Physician Scale) and motivation for medication adherence (Rollnick's Readiness Ruler). In addition, participants will complete self-reported measures of anxiety (General Anxiety Disorder-7), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), and socioeconomic status (Family Affluence Scale II). Several variables will also be abstracted from the electronic medical record, from one year prior to study enrollment to one year post study enrollment. At the end of the intervention, participants will complete an exit survey assessing its feasibility and acceptability. They will be asked to discuss which components of the intervention were most helpful, so this information can be used for possible dismantling study approaches in the future. Twenty-five participants will also be randomly selected and asked to participate in a 30-60 minute telephone interview in order to assess feasibility and acceptability of the study, as well as gain their insight regarding potentially helpful future interventions. Medical or psychosocial support will not be withheld from patients who drop out of the study or do not complete study measures. All data will be collected via Redcap, a HIPAA-compliant on-line platform that will allow participants to complete measures securely on-line at home.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

35

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90027
        • Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

13 years to 21 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • having a liver transplant
  • receiving care at Children's Hospital Los Angeles
  • having access to a working cellphone
  • speaking English.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • insufficient cognitive capacity to understand or engage in the procedures of the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Praise Text Messages
The text message praise intervention lasted for 6 months. Each week, transplant coordinators, masked from who enrolled in the study or to which condition participants were randomized, prepared a list of all patients in the study age group whose laboratory blood tests indicated that immunosuppressant medications were within the expected range. A researcher reviewed the list to identify whether any of patients were currently assigned to the intervention, and if so, sent text message praise via REDCap's text message function. We rotated through 14 standardized text messages each week. Examples of messages included: "Your labs look very good. Super job taking your meds!" and "Your labs look great! Thanks for putting in the effort to take care of your health!."
Texting messages with praise content, to positive reinforce medication adherence
No Intervention: Usual Care
Participants in the usual care arm did not receive any praise text messages. All participants continued to receive usual care from the multidisciplinary liver transplant team, including phone calls and follow-up care when laboratory blood tests indicated that immunosuppressant medications were outside of the expected range.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-Reported Medication Adherence
Time Frame: 9 months
Visual Analogue Scale (0-100% range, with higher scores indicating better values)
9 months
Medication Variability Observed in Immunosuppressant Labs
Time Frame: 12 months
medication level variability index (calculated as standard deviation of at least 3 lab values, with lower scores indicating better values)
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Motivation for Adherence
Time Frame: 9 months
Rollnick's Readiness Ruler (0-10 range, with higher scores indicating better values)
9 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 26, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 26, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 30, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 30, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 9, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 23, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CHLA-19-00189

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Medication Adherence

Clinical Trials on Praise Text Messages

3
Subscribe