SRT Versus SRT+ADT in Prostate Cancer (SPA)

April 13, 2023 updated by: Marco Lorenzo Bonu

Stereotactic Prostate Radiotherapy With or Without Androgen Deprivation Therapy, a Phase III, Multi-institutional Randomized-controlled Trial. The SPA Trial.

To clarify the role of short-term Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in the context of intermediate unfavorable and a subclass of high-risk patients treated with prostate Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT).

In intermediate unfavorable risk group, when choosing standard external beam radiotherapy, short term ADT is superior in terms of biochemical disease free survival (bDFS) to EBRT alone. In high risk disease, results of the combination therapy are even more clear. Prostate SRT has been endorsed as option for primary radical treatment for prostate cancer. In such patients, the benefit of ADT is still unknown and the decision is left to clinical judgement.

For these reasons, it seems to be relevant to propose a randomized, open label, phase III clinical trial of prostate SBRT + 6 months ADT versus prostate SBRT alone in intermediate unfavorable and a subgroup of high risk prostate cancer patients.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

310

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • BS
      • Brescia, BS, Italy, 25123
        • Recruiting
        • ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histological confirmation of prostate acinar adenocarcinoma with a minimum of 10 biopsy cores taken
  • Prostate protocol MRI for local staging
  • Patients belonging to intermediate unfavorable group according to the D'Amico/NCCN risk group classification:

    • -Grade group 3 or/and
    • -2-3 risk factors for intermediate category (PSA 10-20 ng/ml/ Grade group 2-3/ cT2b cT2c) or/and
    • -biopsy cores positive ≥50%
  • Patients belonging to a subclass of high risk group according to the D'Amico/NCCN risk group classification:

    • -ISUP group 4 (GS 4+4, 3+5, 5+3) or
    • -cT3a stage or
    • PSA>20
  • Eastern Coooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) PS 0-2
  • Ability of the patient to understand and sign a written informed consent document
  • Ability and willingness to comply with patients reported outcome questionnaires schedule during the study time
  • IPSS 0-15
  • Prostate Volume less than 100cc
  • PSA must be dosed maximum 60 days before randomization
  • No pathologic lymph nodes and distant metastasis on PET (fluorocholine) scan or CT scan+bone scan.
  • Contraceptive measures for patients with partners with reproductive potential must be explained

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of Malignant tumors in the previous 2 years excluding non melanoma cancers of the skin. If a patient presents an anamnesis of malignancy (excluding non melanoma skin cancers) it must be free from disease since 24 months at the time of enrollement.
  • Previous prostate surgery other than TURP (at least 6 weeks prior to start of SBRT).
  • Previous pelvic RT
  • Prior androgen deprivation therapy (excluding 5alpha reductase inhibitors)
  • Any prior active treatment for prostate cancer; patients on previous active surveillance are eligible if inclusion criteria are met
  • Active severe inflammatory bowel disease
  • Bilateral hip prothesis or any implant that could seriously interfere with dosimetric calculations
  • Age >80 years.
  • cT4a, cT3b or pelvic lymph node involvement
  • Controindication or hypersensitivity to the use of Triptoreline
  • 5alpha reductase inhibitors not discontinued 4 weeks prior to randomization
  • History of bone fractures and fall
  • Risk factors for abnormal heart rhythms or QT prolongation.
  • Use of concomitant medications that prolong the QT/QTc interval

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: SRT+ADT
Patients in ARM A will be treated with SRT on the prostate (consecutive days or at alternate days to a total dose of 36.25 Gy administered in 5 fraction (7.25 Gy/fraction) + LHRH analogue (Triptoreline 22.5 mg). An anti-androgen drug (es. Bicalutamide 50 mg) must be administered daily starting from 7 days before LHRH analogue administration to 10 days after to prevent the flare effect
single administration before SRT starting
1 dose each day, 7 days before LHRH until 10 days after LHRH administration
No Intervention: SRT alone
Patients in ARM B will be treated with SRT on prostate alone at a total dose of 36.25 Gy administered daily or on alternate days in 5 fraction (7.25 Gy/fraction).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
biochemical disease free survival
Time Frame: outcome will be evaluated at the completion of 5 years of follow-up
form the date of the end of radiotherapy to the date of PSA meeting protocol criteria for biochemical relapse or last Follow-up visit. Outcome is mesured in months.
outcome will be evaluated at the completion of 5 years of follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disease free survival
Time Frame: outcome will be evaluated at the completion of 5 years of follow-up
from the date of the end of radiotherapy to the date of relapse (any) or last Follow-up visit.Outcome is mesured in months.
outcome will be evaluated at the completion of 5 years of follow-up
freedom from local recurrence
Time Frame: outcome will be evaluated at the completion of 5 years of follow-up
from the date of the end of radiotherapy to the date of local relapse or last Follow-up visit. Outcome is mesured in months.
outcome will be evaluated at the completion of 5 years of follow-up
freedom from regional recurrence
Time Frame: outcome will be evaluated at the completion of 5 years of follow-up
from the date of the end of radiotherapy to the date of regional relapse or last Follow-up visit. Outcome is mesured in months.
outcome will be evaluated at the completion of 5 years of follow-up
freedom from distant metastasis
Time Frame: outcome will be evaluated at the completion of 5 years of follow-up
from the date of the end of radiotherapy to the date of metastatic relapse or last Follow-up visit. Outcome is mesured in months.
outcome will be evaluated at the completion of 5 years of follow-up
Overall survival
Time Frame: outcome will be evaluated at the completion of 5 years of follow-up
from the date of the end of radiotherapy to the date of death 8any cause) or last Follow-up visit. Outcome is mesured in months.
outcome will be evaluated at the completion of 5 years of follow-up
quality of life, prostate related quality of life in prostate cancer
Time Frame: 12 weeks after SRT, 3, 6 and 12 months after SRT
scored with questionnaire Expandend Prostate cancer Index Composite-26 (EPIC-26), score scale is 0-100 with higher scores representing better health related quality of life
12 weeks after SRT, 3, 6 and 12 months after SRT
quality of life, prostate related quality of life questionnarire
Time Frame: 12 weeks after SRT, 3, 6 and 12 months after SRT
scored with questionnaire European organization for research and treatment of cancer PR 25, (EORTC PR 25), All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high score for the Sexual Activity and Sexual Functioning scales represents a high level of functioning, whereas a high score for the Urinary, Bowel, and Hormonal Treatment Related symptoms scales and Incontinence Aid item represents a high level of symptomatology or problems.
12 weeks after SRT, 3, 6 and 12 months after SRT
patients reported outcome, erectile function assessment,
Time Frame: 12 weeks after SRT, 3, 6 and 12 months after SRT
scored with questionnaire International Index of Erectile Function 5 (IIEF from 25 (best) to 5 (worse))
12 weeks after SRT, 3, 6 and 12 months after SRT
patients reported outcome, prostate related symptoms assessment
Time Frame: 12 weeks after SRT, 3, 6 and 12 months after SRT
scored with questionnaire Internation Prostate syntoms scale (IPSS, from 0 (best) to 35 (worse))
12 weeks after SRT, 3, 6 and 12 months after SRT
Clinician reported Acute Toxicity, assessed with CTCAE 5.0 scales
Time Frame: from the beginning of treatment until 6 months after SRT
Outcome is mesured in 0-5 scale (higher scale worse toxicity)
from the beginning of treatment until 6 months after SRT
Clinician reported Late Toxicity, assessed with CTCAE 5.0 scales
Time Frame: from 6 months after SRT 5 years of follow-up
Outcome is mesured in 0-5 scale (higher scale worse toxicity)
from 6 months after SRT 5 years of follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 30, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 2, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 18, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 25, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 18, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Concurrently with the publication of study results concerning efficacy, we will deliver a completely deidentified data set to an appropriate data archive for sharing purposes.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Concurrently with the publication of study results concerning efficacy, we will deliver a completely deidentified data set to an appropriate data archive for sharing purposes.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

explicit request

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trials on Triptorelin Embonate

Subscribe