Long-term Comparative Cerebrovascular Outcome After Transplantation vs Standard Care in Sickle Cell Anemia (DREPAGREFFE2)

Long-term Comparative Cerebrovascular Outcome After Transplantation vs Standard Care in Children With Sickle Cell Anemia ( DREPAGREFFE-2)

The purpose of the present observational study is to remotely reevaluate the cohort of 67 sickle cell patients with transcranial Doppler-detected cerebral vasculopathy included in the national "Sickle Cell Transplant" protocol and whose 1- and 3-year results were published in JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association) in 2019 and in BHJ in 2020.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The present observational study has the objective to reevaluate at distance the cohort of 67 children with sickle cell anemia enrolled in the "Drepagreffe"trial because of cerebral vasculopathy detected by transcranial Doppler. Results at 1 and 3 years were reported in JAMA in 2019 in BHJ in 2020. This trial was the first worldwide prospective study comparing transplantation to standard care in sickle cell disease. Velocities were highly significantly more reduced with a higher proportion of patients with normalized velocities and better quality of life after transplantation than on standard care. Despite a trend to a better ischemic lesions outcome at 3 years, the difference was not significant and cognitive performances were not different between both groups. The biologic study only assessed at enrollment and 1-year showed lower levels of Ang-2 and HGF (hepatocyte growth factor) after transplant and a significant and independent association between Doppler normalization probability with low Ang-2 and BDNF (brain-derived neurotrophic factor) levels.The aim of the present study is to reassess at 9-10 years this cohort with grants allowing to reevaluate cognitive functioning and hypoxia/angiogenic factors not realized in the systematic cohort follow-up

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

67

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bordeaux, France, 33000
        • Groupe hospitalier Pellegrin
      • Créteil, France, 94000
        • Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil
      • Créteil, France, 94000
        • Hôpital Henri Monr - APHP
      • La Guadeloupe, France, 97110
        • CHU de la Guadeloupe
      • Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France, 94270
        • Hôpital Bicêtre AP-HP
      • Lyon, France, 69008
        • IHOPe
      • Lyon, France, 69737
        • CHU de Lyon
      • Marseille, France, 13005
        • Hôpital de la Timone
      • Montpellier, France, 34295
        • CHU de Montpellier
      • Paris, France, 75015
        • Hôpital Necker - AP-HP
      • Pau, France, 64000
        • CH de Pau
      • Rennes, France, 35033
        • CHU de Rennes
      • Strasbourg, France, 67200
        • Hôpital Hautepierre
    • IDF
      • Paris, IDF, France, 75019
        • Hôpital Robert Debré AP-HP

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

13 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Population concerned 67 patients included in 2011-2013 in the DREPAGREFFE protocol [NCT 01340404]

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient of legal age or minor who participated in the DREPAGREFFE research protocol [NCT 01340404] between December 2010 and June 2013,
  • Having read and understood the information letter

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal to participate
  • Patient deceased

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients included in Drepagreffe 1 study (NCT01340404)
biological collection
blood collection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Long term evolution (at 9-10 years) of Ischemic lesion on brain magnetic resonance imaging 10-year measurement of ischemic lesion on magnetic resonance imaging
Time Frame: within 6 months of inclusion
The MRI-scores, ranging from 0 (best outcome) to 10 (worst outcome), are obtained by adding up the ischemic lesion scores from the left and right sides, i.e., 3 for territorial or 2 for border zone (cortical and subcortical), 1 for white matter and 1 for basal ganglia infarcts and 0 if absent on each side.
within 6 months of inclusion
Long term evolution (at 9-10 years) of arterial stenosis on cerebral and cervical magnetic resonance angiography
Time Frame: within 6 months of inclusion
The MRA stenosis-scores, ranging from 0 (best outcome) to 32 (worst outcome) are defined as the weighted sums over the 8 assessed cerebral arteries, as 0 if no stenosis, 1 if mild stenosis (25-49%), 2 if moderate stenosis (50-74%), 3 if severe stenosis (75-99%), and 4 if occlusion.
within 6 months of inclusion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Long term evolution (at 9-10 years) of cognitive performance
Time Frame: within 6 months of inclusion
Full Scale Intelligence Quotient (40= worst outcome, 160= best outcome) is measured by Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children -Fourth Edition (WISC-4) for children 7-16 years of age and by WAIS-3 (Weschler Adult Intelligence Scale-3) for patients older than 16 years
within 6 months of inclusion
Long term evolution (at 9-10 years) of quality of life
Time Frame: within 6 months of inclusion
Quality of life assessment is collected using the French version of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Generic Core Scale (PedsQLTM 4.0 generic core scales) (physical, emotional, social, school items) (0= worst outcome, 100= best outcome) via self-report and parent proxy-report
within 6 months of inclusion
Evolution at 9-10 years of factors of hypoxia and oxidative stress
Time Frame: within 6 months of inclusion
Assessment on plasma Phosphatidyl-serine expression VEGF, Angiopoietin-1 (Ang-1) and Angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2),EPO, HIF-1, BDNF, PDGF-AA
within 6 months of inclusion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 7, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 5, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 12, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

September 23, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 15, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 11, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sickle Cell Disease

Clinical Trials on blood collection

Subscribe