Effect of Oxygen Therapy for Patients With Precapillary Pulmonary Hypertension Who Experience an Altitude Related Adverse Health Effect (ARAHE) During 30h Exposure to 2500m

May 10, 2022 updated by: University of Zurich

The Impact of Hypoxia on Patients With Precapillary Pulmonary Hypertension and Treatment of Adverse Effects

To study whether oxygen therapy titrated to maintain oxygenation (SpO2) > 90% at 2500m would resolve altitude-related adverse health effects, symptoms and impaired exercise during 30h exposure to high altitude.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Patients with pulmonary hypertension who reveal an altitude-related adverse health effects at 2500m will be given oxygen therapy by nasal cannula titrated to maintain the oxygen saturation above 90%. The study will investigate, whether this measure will restore altitude-induced impairment to baseline levels at low altitude.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

9

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Zurich, Switzerland, 8091
        • Respiratory Clinic, University Hospital of Zurich

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Informed consent as documented by signature
  • PH class I (PAH) or IV (CTEPH) diagnosed according to guidelines: mean pulmonary artery pressure >20 mmHg, pulmonary vascular resistance ≥3 wood units, pulmonary arterial wedge pressure ≤15 mmHg during baseline measures at the diagnostic right-heart catheterization

Exclusion Criteria:

  • resting partial pressure of oxygen <8 kilopascal at Zurich at 490 m low altitude
  • exposure to an altitude >1000 m for ≥3 nights during the last 2 weeks before the study
  • inability to follow the procedures of the study
  • other clinically significant concomitant end-stage disease (e.g., renal failure, hepatic dysfunction)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Oxygen Therapy
Oxygen Therapy in patients developing an altitude related adverse health effect (ARAHE) during 30h exposure to 2500m of high altitude
Oxygen Therapy in patients developing an altitude related adverse health effect (ARAHE) during 30h exposure to 2500m of high altitude

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recovery from ARAHE
Time Frame: 30 hours
Proportion of patients with precapillary pulmonary hypertension experiencing an ARAHE at 2500 m of high altitude and receiving oxygen therapy titrated to achieve SpO2 ≥ 90% who recover from ARAHE, have improved symptoms and achieve constant work-rate exercise time within a minimal important difference as defined for patients with respiratory disease within 1.75 min of baseline value at 490 m; time frame within 6 h after initiation of oxygen therapy.
30 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Constant work-rate exercise time
Time Frame: 30 hours
Difference with oxygen therapy at high altitude vs. low altitude in constant work-rate exercise time cycle exercise test at 75% Wmax at low altitude
30 hours
Maximum work-rate in incremental ramp cycle exercise tests
Time Frame: 30 hours
Difference with oxygen therapy at high altitude vs. low altitude in maximal exercise capacity during a incremental ramp cycle exercise test
30 hours
Hemodynamics
Time Frame: 30 hours
Difference with oxygen therapy at high altitude vs. low altitude in hemodynamics assessed by echocardiography at rest including pulmonary artery pressure, cardiac output, pulmonary vascular resistance and right heart function assessed as tricuspid plane systolic excursion and fractional area change.
30 hours
Borg dyspnoea scale
Time Frame: 30 hours
Difference with oxygen therapy at high altitude vs. low altitude baseline in post-exercise Borg dyspnoea scale going from 1-10 scores with higher values meaning worse dyspnea
30 hours
Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: 30 hours
Difference with oxygen therapy at high altitude vs. low altitude baseline in symptoms assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale for dyspnoea, a 10cm line from left to right where patients have to add a cross-line with higher values meaning better feeling.
30 hours
Cognitive testing
Time Frame: 30 hours
Difference with oxygen therapy at high altitude vs. low altitude baseline in cognitive function tests
30 hours
sit-to-stand test
Time Frame: 30 hours
Difference with oxygen therapy at high altitude vs. low altitude baseline in sit-to-stand test
30 hours
Sleep disordered breathing
Time Frame: 30 hours
Difference with oxygen therapy at high altitude vs. low altitude in sleep disordered breathing
30 hours
6 minute walk test
Time Frame: 30 hours
Difference with oxygen therapy at high altitude vs. low altitude in 6 minute walk test
30 hours
Acute Mountain Sickness Score
Time Frame: 30 hours
Difference with oxygen therapy at high altitude vs. low altitude baseline in symptoms assessed by the Lake Louise acute mountain sickness score going from 0-12 points with mild AMS as 3-5 points, moderate AMS as 6-9 points, and severe AMS as 10-12 points.
30 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 18, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 15, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

April 15, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 14, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 27, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

November 8, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 11, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Oxygen Therapy

Clinical Trials on Oxygen Therapy

3
Subscribe